Abaddon,
Controlled imagination is a part of any scientific process. You have to make distinction between imagination as in day-dreaming and informed-intuition imagination, there?s your difference.
I personally do not want to be dragged into this discussion as it evokes strong spirits on both sides.
My intention to post on this thread was, and I want to reiterate, to give some helpful pointers about critically approaching any subject and not to promote my cherished belief system (So let?s leave it at that).
Reason being is that evolution just as religion can generate almost religion-like following.
Now I know that this statement is bound to attract some criticism but it is true. Though I agree that evolutionists do use scientific method of investigation with an assumption of everything being explainable through natural processes and any suggestion of any kind of design (even if we are talking about intelligence in any shape and form, intelligent universe, nature, etc) is consider scientific heresy, and anyone daring to explore these alternative is bound to be frowned upon by community of his peers. And this is a hard, cold truth about the matter.
On the other hand many religionists do not engage into rational thinking, hence many of their argument fall short of explaining anything but merely reaffirming evolutionists in belief that all religionists are ?incapable retards?. I know this is hurting comment but lets call things what they are.
I?m not saying again that I do not believe in some parts of evolution theory but just as religion I can not accept it per se or in its entirety if you will.
My opinion is formed solely on what I know and what I?ve heard form other colleagues (some of them also being biologists)
Just a question Abaddon. Since you are such a staunch supporter of evolution may I ask you if you are an expert in the field or are you still a student?
Just a piece of advice to everyone: Do not read too much into whatever you read question everything until you are satisfied. Anything can be explained so that it makes sense. The question is though does it make facts?
There?s your challenge: to find hard, cold truth. Which means first collect data, then from these data collect facts, once you have facts established then you have information, many factual information start forming the truth.
If this help to anyone I?ll be happiest man alive :o)