twich, we had a math/phys teacher in high school that always started to TWICH when confronted with an out-of-the-box - thinking type argument, and at least one of us kids were from Physics - Nobel-Laureat families, just itching to get him twitching
You knew a teacher with a tic and someone who had a famous relative who could actually prove something. This doesn't make you right in this or anything for that matter.
Had you taken a course in critical thinking, you would have learned what you just wrote is a ad hominem, which doesn't help your case and in fact, proves your inability to back up your claims.
It could just be that prologos looked at the tides and said "standing wave" as in lenticular clouds [surfed by sail planes] waves in RAPIDS [surfed by surfers, cayakers]
I'm sure he did and thought he was an expert in such things.
As I requested, please advise on the force in oppostion to gravity that results in a standing wave that causes tides.
another case of WIKI waiting to be amended.
I eagerly await your foray into amending the incorrect info written and it's acceptance by established experts on the subject.
proof? look at the tide coming in: a wave always linked to the Moon, just ~standing there.
I considered what you call proof. Then I consulted widely accepted facts written by those who may have won Nobel prizes in science. I'll go with their explanation, which again, makes no mention of standing waves.
That you cannot provide evidence of your assertions and resort to ad hominem is proof of your misinterpretation and wilful ignorance of established science.
Sad, really