next question,please?
How does one put any value into your "insights" when they are based on unproven hypothesis, speculation and poor communication/use of terms? Especially coming from someone who didn't understand the movement of the earth with respect to the stars and had to have the concept explained, one that is the most basic in astronomy. That you consider yourself suitable to "educate" people in astrophysics is laughable.
Also, using your status as a geriatric father as an excuse for anything is lame and irrelevant with regard to these topics, if it is even true which I doubt.
Lastly, you had mentioned being published in Popular Science. I'd be interested in reading the article, if you'd be so kind as to provide the title, year and volume. (I would be in awe of your editor btw)
Please provide something credible so that you're not regarded as a lunatic, a liar or both