And 2 hours of exposure have produced star trails measuring 30° of arc.
24 hrs exposure time would thus produce 360 degrees of arc
Talk to me about declination and hour angle.
one of the things that i have only done once... but i would love to do again and again until i perfect the technique, is called star trails.. my camera is a canon 60d.
there is a way to "hack" the canon dslr's so that they get some amazing functionalities, such as taking a picture just by clapping (really cool for when you want to take a picture and no one is able to push the button) and taking pictures at certain intervals.. you can read more about this "hacking" on .
http://www.magiclantern.fm/.
And 2 hours of exposure have produced star trails measuring 30° of arc.
24 hrs exposure time would thus produce 360 degrees of arc
Talk to me about declination and hour angle.
A tidal bore is a slowly moving standing wave node where a river current meets an ocean tidal current, the latter overcoming the former by a large margin in certain circumstances. There is only a tidal bore when the tide is coming in, not when it's going out, naturally.
I've been to the Bay of Fundy, St John's Reversing Falls, and a couple other places with similar phenomena.
Magnetic Hill in Moncton was cool but is only an optical illusion, albeit a good one.
one of the things that i have only done once... but i would love to do again and again until i perfect the technique, is called star trails.. my camera is a canon 60d.
there is a way to "hack" the canon dslr's so that they get some amazing functionalities, such as taking a picture just by clapping (really cool for when you want to take a picture and no one is able to push the button) and taking pictures at certain intervals.. you can read more about this "hacking" on .
http://www.magiclantern.fm/.
so if that is the case you live in the southern hemisphere, and are wellcome to visit and see Polaris
It would stand to reason you cannot see Polaris, the North Star from the southern hemisphere more a few latitudes south of the earth's equator.
your pictures did not capture the rotation of the earth at all, but the rotation of your camera?
Since stars do not move (with respect to our timeframe) the photo is proof of the earth's rotation. The camera is static and moves with the earth, the exposures taken over a number of hours.
A very basic astronomical concept actually
it is very difficult to knock a ball into a hole (like golf), throw it into a receiver's hands (american football) intercept it and knock it over the fence (american cricket).
or to put a sattelite at the right time at the right speed in the right direction in the right place to have it orbit another body, so :.
what ingenious natural & process is it, than can get 9+ zillions bodies to get into the right orbit simultaniously or sequentially and have them remain there for billions of years?
prologos
RE density wave theory.
It would seem that one study found no evidence supporting the theory and another is "likely" to salvage it if the team can fix the bugs in their method.
To settle the question, astronomers will need to produce more refined models and explore the regions in greater detail and in more galaxies.
Seems just a theory still and a ways to go before it's confirmed as law.
it is very difficult to knock a ball into a hole (like golf), throw it into a receiver's hands (american football) intercept it and knock it over the fence (american cricket).
or to put a sattelite at the right time at the right speed in the right direction in the right place to have it orbit another body, so :.
what ingenious natural & process is it, than can get 9+ zillions bodies to get into the right orbit simultaniously or sequentially and have them remain there for billions of years?
twich, I have been working FROM the astronomical tables, that were available in libraries, -[no need (or ability)* to post them]- and later from data available on line of asteroid and TNO orbits, all i did was found the hidden patterns, regularities sequences in the distances, the means, the excentricities. all amazingly related, no doubt caused by the the natural laws.
* remember my technical handicap: pushing 90, and pushing a 2 year old daughter in the stroller.
Right, sorry, I forgot.
we already are very familiar with the god delusion, but what to think about the property of being self aware is just another illusion?.
buddhism asserts that and many people does not know that the very materialism (physicalism) asserts that too.. how can an illusion be self aware to be an illusion in itself?
what would change in your life if you accept this?.
Well, this should be interesting...
one of the things that i have only done once... but i would love to do again and again until i perfect the technique, is called star trails.. my camera is a canon 60d.
there is a way to "hack" the canon dslr's so that they get some amazing functionalities, such as taking a picture just by clapping (really cool for when you want to take a picture and no one is able to push the button) and taking pictures at certain intervals.. you can read more about this "hacking" on .
http://www.magiclantern.fm/.
Cool pix
it is very difficult to knock a ball into a hole (like golf), throw it into a receiver's hands (american football) intercept it and knock it over the fence (american cricket).
or to put a sattelite at the right time at the right speed in the right direction in the right place to have it orbit another body, so :.
what ingenious natural & process is it, than can get 9+ zillions bodies to get into the right orbit simultaniously or sequentially and have them remain there for billions of years?
Thank you Ruby456
it is very difficult to knock a ball into a hole (like golf), throw it into a receiver's hands (american football) intercept it and knock it over the fence (american cricket).
or to put a sattelite at the right time at the right speed in the right direction in the right place to have it orbit another body, so :.
what ingenious natural & process is it, than can get 9+ zillions bodies to get into the right orbit simultaniously or sequentially and have them remain there for billions of years?
Theist proof of grand design? perhaps a hidden agenda in the back of my mind? Yes, I would like to elicit enlightened comments on that. my -self: I believe in a creator-worker, for I have struggled all my life with that in various ways. but I conceive the Creator or caring Creatriss as so superior, that any resulting structure, like the 10 planet regularity was a buid-in possibility from the first shove into action-time.
You're entitled to your opinion
Musical notes at certain intervals.? yes, it is the intervals in the planetary spacings that are the clue.
To what exactly?
For an upcoming presentation at the local Astronomy society I am trying to prepare a striking handout. I have made multiple charts, ruler-like of the spacings in real proportion, about 1mm to the bode no.-- 10 mm for earth orbit. sun to pluto fits on a legal sheet.
IF you reverse these strips, it is striking that the lines [overlapp]* no, ALIGN again and again. So these notes are NODES areas where in a chladni plate, matter would congregate for lack of vibrations, and the system is TUNED.
Not vibrations, just classical mechanics doing it's job. Matter that begins in zones between what becomes planets eventually gets cleared out. There are no vibrations, there are no waves. Periodic relationships and distance ratios do not waves make.
Music of the spheres revisited.
I suspected as much. A classical concept and a poetic one but more pseudo than science. I hope you realize this.
just venting.
vent away
it is very difficult to knock a ball into a hole (like golf), throw it into a receiver's hands (american football) intercept it and knock it over the fence (american cricket).
or to put a sattelite at the right time at the right speed in the right direction in the right place to have it orbit another body, so :.
what ingenious natural & process is it, than can get 9+ zillions bodies to get into the right orbit simultaniously or sequentially and have them remain there for billions of years?
twitch, the planetary spacings, that I worked on for twenty years in the most beautiful surroundings [like heisenberg if you know the de-tails] I consider facts, trusting the published data. the b&T explanation or measurement was partial.
Well, feel free to cite the published data you've worked from. We've been waiting.
The corelation between solar resonances are evident, are they DIRECT causes? a hidden domain? consider
If you mean orbital resonances, yes, there is something to it with respect to ratios but please pay attetion to terms; they are important.
As regards these being direct causes (assumed to be theist/deist influenced) that depends on your belief, which is only an opinion and not science, of course.
Hidden domain? Are you some sort of wizard?
the lagrangian points 60 degrees, that is at the RADIUS distance, before and after Jupiter, the Trojan asteroids,( and other bodies) this is compatible with resonance NODES based on the orbit radius, (with its roots in the T&B idea) of course garvity is involved, but it seems to have a wave character.
Again with the waves thing, eh? You have some points that corroborate to certain facts, if in your usual cryptic style but you seem to have fascination with seeing waves where there are none.
Lagrange points and orbital resonances are based on gravity, classical mechanics, periodic relationships and ratios. Though waves are typically periodic in nature, these examples do not induce or are a result of wave propagation even if the latter is periodic. Nodes in physics are points on a standing wave and don't apply here.
If you have published peer reviewed references that say otherwise, please by all means, cite them. Otherwise, your musings are at best speculative, at worst, misleading.