Yeah, for all you str8 boys out there the women were very hot. Long live Slut-A-Rina, godess of all hot whores. LOL.
The men were all grizzled and old.
But then again that's Frank Miller for you.
EvilForce
JoinedPosts by EvilForce
-
7
Sin City.. omg.. SO GOOD
by GetBusyLiving injust wanna let you guys onto this amazing movie i just saw!
i think every ex dub should celebrate their ex dubness by watching this terrific flick!
it has everything you could ever want in a movie - great style, ultra violence, corny terrific dialog, amazing cast.
-
-
EvilForce
-
28
Bible Study Burns Down the House...
by Sparkplug insomeone just mentioned 1978 and it reminded me that a bible study of my mothers burnt our house down while we were gone to the international convention in california.
she robbed us blind and then toasted our house.
do you think jehovah had a plan there and that we were being blessed for sitting something like 8 freaking days out in the sun in california?
-
-
EvilForce
I guess that should have been a tip off....
Provide someone else with chicken get pig's feet in return.
Spend your days going out in service, going to meetings, and donating money and the elders will just kick you in the dick and call it even. -
34
How long is a cotton picking minute?
by Elsewhere in.
sometimes i hear someone say: "hold on just one cotton pick'in minute....".
i'm wondering, is a "cotten picking minute" a "bored" minute that feels like a long time or is it a "busy" minute that seems to fly by?
-
-
EvilForce
Shitting in tall cotton refers to keeping your private business shielded from other's prying eyes.
So when you needed to go to the bathroom you would find tall cotton to squat down in so others wouldn't see you carrying out your private business.
So if you noticed a friend was absent and asked someone who knew where he was.... he would say he was Shitting In Tall Cotton....which could refer to him sleeping with his mistress, at the doctor, etc.... -
47
Comments You Will Not Hear at the 4-10-05 WT Study (Marriage--March 1)
by blondie incomments you will not hear at the 4-10-05 wt study (march 1, 2005 issue)
review comments
will be in black and parentheses ().
-
-
EvilForce
Blondie,
Keep in mind I haven't stepped foot into a KH for over 10 years...so the public talk list has grown... but as you mention it is alot of the same material over and over again. I remember hearing the same talk 3 times by 3 different "brothers" in 18 months. Scheduling issues, etc....
But since the material is so dry and uninteresting it's easy to slip into "Kingdom Hall Coma" as we used to call it. Sit down lull youself into some trance to seem interested in the material and wonder if the KH is in a blackhole since time grinds to a virtual halt.
LOL -
34
How long is a cotton picking minute?
by Elsewhere in.
sometimes i hear someone say: "hold on just one cotton pick'in minute....".
i'm wondering, is a "cotten picking minute" a "bored" minute that feels like a long time or is it a "busy" minute that seems to fly by?
-
-
EvilForce
Not sure if it is a swear word replacement or truly a means of measuring how long a minute should be.
Cotton picking is a long, ardous process, hot process....so not sure.
I do know what "Shitting in tall cotton" means though :) -
28
Bible Study Burns Down the House...
by Sparkplug insomeone just mentioned 1978 and it reminded me that a bible study of my mothers burnt our house down while we were gone to the international convention in california.
she robbed us blind and then toasted our house.
do you think jehovah had a plan there and that we were being blessed for sitting something like 8 freaking days out in the sun in california?
-
-
EvilForce
Apparently you and your family were too materialistic.... you needed this "sheep like" one to burn your house down to show you how little material things are worth in Jo Ho's world.
-
47
Comments You Will Not Hear at the 4-10-05 WT Study (Marriage--March 1)
by blondie incomments you will not hear at the 4-10-05 wt study (march 1, 2005 issue)
review comments
will be in black and parentheses ().
-
-
EvilForce
They are called special talks because they aren't from the same pool of 70 or so public talks regurgitated week after week after week. Enough of an outline to keep the "brother" somewhat on track but enough room to have him insert his own beliefs about what the bible... I mean FDS requires of us as "good Christians".
Or maybe they are called special talks because the spiritual food is so pureed, sliced, and diced into mush a "special" person could digest it. -
47
Comments You Will Not Hear at the 4-10-05 WT Study (Marriage--March 1)
by blondie incomments you will not hear at the 4-10-05 wt study (march 1, 2005 issue)
review comments
will be in black and parentheses ().
-
-
EvilForce
Yes Blondie that is me in my avatar :)
However I am gay so might be more interested in young brothers coming up to me...LOL.
This article makes me laugh. The Dub's think they are sooo enlightened when it comes to marriage. Puleeze! The person who mentioned "no fault" divorce above I think has missed the point. No fault divorce allowed women to get out of bad relationships without the burden of proving infidelity or other gross sin. In most of this country previously and to this day in other countries, a woman had to have witnesses to the adultry act. Obviously this is a hard thing to get. A woman could not be taken at her word since she was obviously a lying, bitter, hag.
Of course this was just barely above the step of woman being treated as property. They are still classified as this in various Muslim countries.
This is in the same vein when I argue with other "conservatives" about gay marriage. They spout off how they believe in "traditional" values, blah, blah. Well my history books show me that for most of human existence woman were property, marriages were arranged, and women/men married to increase the stake of their land holdings, status, or social standing. Not a marriage of free choice, that is a modern day invention only 100 to 150 years old at most. So let's have traditional marriage then for everyone. I think NOT. -
40
Would the W.T. be open for massive lawsuits if they changed blood policy?
by hubert ini was just thinking of this, because of my last post topic.
if the watchtower changed their no blood policy to accepting whole blood, would and could that .
open the flood gates for law suits from jdubs that sacrificed their children for the tower, or would .
-
-
EvilForce
In my medical opinion she died because of the blood policy. During the surgery she lost a fair bit of blood, (not massive amounts), the doctor, knowing he could not use blood at all as an option over expanded her blood system w/ blood replacement items knowing that blood replacement isn't as effective at transporting oxygen and such. This started a cascade of issues which eventually overwhelmed her cardiac and pulmonary systems.
I was in med school at the time and started a debate w/ a "local elder on the hospital committee" on where the biblical proof was in not allowing someone to store a couple of units of blood prior to a surgery. This one the other final belief system flaw I could not accept from the Jo Ho's. The 1914 thing first, then this blood thing.
So it's ok to get an organ transplant? Yes. - I asked the elder how he thought that "jived" with the bible. I asked him to explain how the remaining blood in any organ during transplant figured into this. Do you think they give that organ a hose down w/ bleach or something?
Storing up blood? No, can't do it. - This would be "eating blood" again because you are removing the blood and then putting it back in the body....but what about dialysis I ask? That's removing the blood and then putting it back in. He responded, "no it's different it's just expanding one's circulatory system."
White blood cell transfusion? Yes. - That's actually a tissue, not blood per se.
After a couple of hours, I found his answers to be legalistic and petty without regard to the "INTENT" of the Mosaic law. I of course asked him how we were supposed to know which of the Old Testament rules we were still under law to uphold and which one's we weren't. Apparently it should be apparent. I guess eating blood vs. wearing a shirt made of two threads or eating shell fish is apparent to everyone else other than me.
From here on out my belief in the J'dubs went down the tube. That was in 1989. I think I had quit going completely other than a memorial here and there sometime in 1990 / 1991. -
40
Would the W.T. be open for massive lawsuits if they changed blood policy?
by hubert ini was just thinking of this, because of my last post topic.
if the watchtower changed their no blood policy to accepting whole blood, would and could that .
open the flood gates for law suits from jdubs that sacrificed their children for the tower, or would .
-
-
EvilForce
No lawyer would take the case on a contingency basis is what you meant. A lawyer would persue it if you paid the way. But to get to trial against the WTS would cost you about $ 150,000.... money better spent on writing a book, spreading the word of thier falsehoods, etc...
And besides the WTS has bilked all of us out of too much time, money, and energy no?
My grandmother died in the recovery room after a routine hip replacement because she wouldn't take blood :(