Using Firefox, I can see all of this thread, but using Windows Explorer, I can't. I've had this problem before so knew what to do. Anyway, here's my email to Emma Britton:
Dear Ms. Britton,
Thank you for presenting such a fair-minded and reasonable interview with former Jehovah's Witness, Nathan Phillips, and also the former Witness elder.
I'm writing from the US and live in the State of Tennessee. We were Jehovah's Witnesses. My husband, who held supervisory positions in the religion since he was in his 20s, and I were extremely active Witnesses for nearly five decades and know the religious teachings inside out, especially about the ramification of being disfellowshipped which is complete shunning by family and friends.
We were baptized as teenagers and disfellowshipped in our 60s for "apostasy" and consequently shunned by all the people who were previously in our lives. In fact, we have not seen our son (a JW elder for around 20 years), and his wife and child for 9 years due to the Watch Tower's shunning policy. Recently, a now former Witness, who saw our son in 2006 in Indiana where he lives, called us. During the conversation, we learned that we have another grandchild, a girl, who was born in 2006 but kept secret from us. We cannot even verify if the information is correct because of Watch Tower’s shunning policy.
The reason for my disfellowshipping was because of going to the media accusing the Watch Tower of harboring and protecting pedophiles by not reporting accusations of child sex abuse to the authorities.
My accusations were based on facts because when we were living and working as volunteers for eleven years at the world headquarters of JWs in Brooklyn, NY, I was assigned to the Watch Tower’s Writing Dept. where I was a researcher. In that capacity, I discovered that there was a world-wide problem within the religion of not reporting accusations of sexual child abuse to the authorities and nobody was the wiser. I consequently left the religion in 1998 when I could see that there were not going to be any changes in Watch Tower child abuse policies.
In 2002, just before I appeared on NBC's Dateline TV program discussing the problem, I was disfellowshipped and then shunned, and a few months later, my husband was disfellowshipped and shunned for speaking out too. Were we the sinners that the Bible said not to eat with or say hello to? Yes, if the Eleventh Commandment is, "Thou shalt not go public!" Our son told me before I was disfellowshipped that my concern and aid to child abuse victims was a noble thing, but that I should never have gone public. See http:// www.watchtowerdocuments.com /documents/2000-present.html Scroll down to the third or fourth document in the list. Both are videos of the Dateline program I appeared in.
To put it another way, I was a whistle-blower, not a sinner by the standard set forth in the Bible verse that the Watch Tower partially quoted in their letter to you. But in the eyes of the Watch Tower, because of what I did, I should be viewed as a sinner, and as dead or as if I never existed, by my son and his family and our now former friends, which did literally number in the thousands because of our positions within the religion.
Watch Tower claims in its literature that disfellowshipping is an act of love because shunning will cause “sinners” to realize what was lost and then change their ways and return to the religion. However, that's not true in my case because in 2007, I appeared on NBC once again, this time on NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams. The discussion was centered on the Watch Tower settling out-of-court, nine (9) lawsuits with sixteen (16) victims of child sexual abuse. From secret court documents I obtained, the settlement amount was for over twelve (12) million dollars. Watch Tower leaders did not acknowledge responsibility, but by settling these cases, they acknowledged their liability for not reporting molesters to the police; hence, they certainly were responsible for more children being molested.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=AU&hl=en-GB&v=N9Xjw_sk7tA
In addition, both my husband and I appeared in a documentary produced in Geneva, Switzerland that aired in French, November 11, 2010, discussing the child abuse cover-up. http://www.tsr.ch/emissions/temps-present/2482487-grandir-avec-jehovah.html
Please don't let Watch Tower's persuasive and manipulative words explaining shunning be accorded any favor. The facts are that they spin and tweak their harmful beliefs for the press and expect everyone outside of the Witness religion to think that disfellowshipped folks are all liars when we say we are shunned by our loved ones. In reality, if Jehovah’s Witnesses didn’t shun the disfellowshipped, they would be disfellowshipped and shunned too.
In the past, I actually wrote articles for Jehovah’s Witnesses Awake! magazine. I knew then how to spin the baloney because I was taught by the best, and I recognize Watch Tower's baloney when I hear it now!
Barbara Anderson
http://www.watchtowerdocuments.com