AndersonsInfo
JoinedPosts by AndersonsInfo
-
16
The case from Denmark - setttled in The European Court
by AndersonsInfo inbeninu andersen.
denmark.
i am not aware of how many of you are familiar with the danish case of a jehovah's witness who was hospitalized after a tragic accident where he fell several floors from a scaffolding where he was working.. the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit and was conscious (albeit somewhat confused) for the first three weeks.
-
AndersonsInfo
From:Beninu AndersenDenmarkI am not aware of how many of you are familiar with the Danish case of a Jehovah's Witness who was hospitalized after a tragic accident where he fell several floors from a scaffolding where he was working.The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit and was conscious (albeit somewhat confused) for the first three weeks. But suddenly the situation develops drastically, and the patient loses consciousness and at the same time an urgent need arises for a life-saving blood transfusion.The patient certainly had an older advance directive in his medical record, and it also appeared from old medical records that the patient is a Jehovah's Witness and did not want to receive a blood transfusion.The doctors hold an emergency conference and reach the conclusion that their oath as doctors is more important than an advance directive that may or may not be used as a basis for choosing treatment.The man never regains consciousness and a week later he dies from the injuries he sustained in the work-related accident.The estate of the deceased files a complaint against the hospital and the attending physician before the Danish Agency for Patient Complaints, but the agency acquits the doctor and the hospital. The widow then takes the agency itself to court, and here the widow is initially successful. However, the Agency for Patient Complaints appeals this decision to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court overturns the judgment from the High Court and acquits both the Agency, the doctor and the hospital because it was a special situation where doctors suddenly had to decide whether a patient still maintained his prohibition against the use of blood products in the treatment of his disorder, while the doctors could not get an unequivocal statement about this from the patient due to loss of consciousness.The Supreme Court emphasized that an unequivocal statement about the prohibition of the use of blood prior to a scheduled operation must always be respected, but in borderline cases where doctors cannot get a clear answer from the patient confirming that they stand by their decision, the doctors have the right to draw a personal discretion and assess whether their oath as doctors carries more weight than an advance directive.The estate of the deceased was not satisfied with the decision from the Supreme Court, and therefore appealed the decision to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The ECHR has just upheld the national court's decision and supports Denmark's Supreme Court.This must be considered a significant development in the attitude to whether there are situations where doctors can override an advance directive.Beninu AndersenDenmark -
4
New Zealand: Leaving the ‘cult’ of the Jehovah’s Witnesses behind
by AndersonsInfo inttps://www.thepress.co.nz/nz-news/350446426/leaving-cult-jehovahs-witnesses-behind.
the press.
october 12, 2024 .
-
AndersonsInfo
ttps://www.thepress.co.nz/nz-news/350446426/leaving-cult-jehovahs-witnesses-behind
THE PRESS
OCTOBER 12, 2024
The world was supposed to end in 1975. Shayne Mechen was 7 years old and living in Hawke’s Bay when he waited for it to happen. He remembers a sense of dread, but perhaps there was some expectation too. As Jehovah’s Witnesses, he and his family would be among the saved. Of course Armageddon never happened. We’re all still here.Mechen was born into the faith, and was 4 days old at his first Jehovah’s Witnesses meeting. It was his entire life. He remembers weekends spent on faith activities, with no time for sports, no associating with people outside the faith, not even visits to the homes of school friends who were not also Jehovah’s Witnesses. READ MORE:
https://www.thepress.co.nz/nz-news/350446426/leaving-cult-jehovahs-witnesses-behind
-
Japan: JW's criticize "Q&A" banning religious abuse: 700+ pages of document "restraint" on the country?
by AndersonsInfo inhttps://www.fnn.jp/articles/-/769481?display=full&s=03.
[exclusive] jehovah's witnesses criticize "q&a" banning religious abuse: 700+ pages of document "restraint" on the country?.
mr. matsuoka.
-
AndersonsInfo
https://www.fnn.jp/articles/-/769481?display=full&s=03
[Exclusive] Jehovah's Witnesses criticize "Q&A" banning religious abuse: 700+ pages of document "restraint" on the country?
Tuesday, October 8, 2024 12:05 PMSecond generation religious issues
Blood transfusions were prohibited, corporal punishment was carried out with whipping, and former members were shunned.
The new Christian religion "Jehovah's Witnesses" has been criticized both at home and abroad for violating human rights, with lawyers revealing such acts against second-generation religious members as the results of their investigations. In March 2024, it was discovered that the sect submitted a document to the Agency for Children and Families criticizing the guidelines prohibiting religious abuse.
Documents submitted by Jehovah's Witnesses to the Agency for Children and Families obtained by FNNFNN requested the Child and Family Agency for Public Information and obtained a total of 776 pages of documents prepared by the cult. Experts point out that the cult's actions "may have been aimed at restraining the country."
The emerging issue of second-generation religious
The issue of second-generation religious believers has attracted attention since the shooting of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in July 2022.
Through interviews with second-generation religious believers, the government published a Q&A on how to respond to child abuse related to religious beliefs at the end of the same year. It established guidelines to prohibit abuse in the four types stipulated in the Child Abuse Prevention Law: 1) physical abuse, 2) sexual abuse, 3) neglect, and 4) psychological abuse.
Tetsuya Yamagami, the defendant who shot former Prime Minister Abe, was a second-generation religious believerFurthermore, based on the Q&A, the Agency for Children and Families conducted a survey of child consultation centers nationwide without identifying religious corporations. The results, published in April this year, revealed multiple confirmed cases of "refusing to allow blood transfusions that doctors deemed necessary," "inciting fear through words and images to hinder the child's free decision-making," and "significantly neglecting upbringing by participating in missionary activities."
A 776-page "Submission to the Japanese Government" suddenly arrived
Meanwhile, it was discovered that in March 2024, around the time of the survey, the cult had sent a document to the Agency for Children and Families and other organizations criticizing the Q&A.
Jehovah's Witnesses sent out literature criticizing "Q&A"FNN made a disclosure request to the Agency for Children and Families in June 2024. The documents were made public in September.
The document, titled "Jehovah's Witnesses: People Who Love and Care Deeply for Their Families: A Submission to the Japanese Government," is 776 pages long and about seven centimeters thick.
Most of the documents released were redactedHowever, the contents of the documents that were made public were deemed to be "likely to harm the rights, competitive position, or other legitimate interests of the corporation or other entities" under the Freedom of Information Act, and with the exception of a few pages, almost every page was "blacked out."
Meanwhile, subsequent interviews with those involved revealed how the document was submitted and its gist.
According to a person involved, in March 2024, a person in charge of the cult contacted the Child and Family Agency's Child Abuse Prevention Division, saying that they wanted to meet. When the member of the division replied that they would refrain from meeting, the person in charge later brought the documents without an appointment and sent them by mail.
The church officials visitedThe document denied the existence of religious abuse within the cult, but mentioned the freedom of religion guaranteed by the Constitution, and also criticized the Q&A. It cited flaws in the process of creating the Q&A, including "the composition of the review committee was biased" and "it only took about three weeks to create." It also included written opinions from scholars.
The letter also claimed that "the publication of the Q&A led to a more than seven-fold increase in hate crimes against those associated with the cult," and that "the Q&A serves as a justification for hate crimes," and that the Q&A should be reviewed by experts independent of the government.
Is this a warning to countries requesting a dissolution order?
Professor Nishida Kimiaki (social psychology) of Rissho University, who was involved in compiling the Q&A and is an expert on issues such as second-generation religious leaders, points out that "the background to this is probably concern about the request for a dissolution order to the former Unification Church (Family Federation for World Peace and Unification)."
Professor Kimiaki Nishida (social psychology) of Rissho University, an expert on issues such as second-generation religious leadersRegarding the former Unification Church, the government requested an order to disband the sect at the Tokyo District Court in October last year, and the hearing is still ongoing. "It seems likely that they were concerned that the series of moves such as the formulation of Q&As and fact-finding investigations had made the abuse within Jehovah's Witnesses visible, which could lead to the request for a disbandment order spreading to them as well. They probably wanted to warn the government by saying they would 'fight' against such moves."
The lawyer pointed out that "on the surface they appear to comply, but behind closed doors they criticize the authorities."Attorney Hirotaro Tanaka of the Jehovah's Witnesses Problem Support Lawyers Group mentioned a press release issued by the sect in May 2023. In the press release, the group stated that it would be happy to cooperate with the Agency for Children and Families, including by informing all believers of the Q&A. Attorney Tanaka pointed out that "it is obvious that the sect is showing its willingness to comply on the surface while secretly criticizing the authorities."
Apart from Jehovah's Witnesses...
We asked the Japan branch of Jehovah's Witnesses about this document, but received no response, saying, "We decide which media organizations provide information to us. Therefore, we will refrain from responding to your interview request at this time."
FNN also filed a freedom of information request to find out whether other religious corporations had submitted documents to the Agency for Children and Families similarly criticizing the Q&A, but was unable to find any such examples apart from those of Jehovah's Witnesses.
UN Human Rights Council Special Rapporteur expresses concern over "Q&A"In April 2024, a special rapporteur from the United Nations Human Rights Council sent a notice to the Japanese government expressing concern over Q&A, stating that "Q&A has led to hate crimes." However, the Japanese government responded in June, "Even if Q&A has been used to justify hate crimes, it is extremely regrettable regardless of the policy intention."
The human rights of children, which must be protected, and the freedom of religion guaranteed by the Constitution. The gap between the two is not likely to be easily bridged. However, the second generation of religious believers are still stuck in limbo. The question is how to deal with their suffering.
[Written by: Matsuoka Shinken, reporter in the social affairs department at Fuji Television]Mr. MatsuokaFuji Television News Department Social Affairs Reporter
Born in 1991, raised in Fukuoka Prefecture and Canada. After graduating from Keio University Faculty of Law, joined a national newspaper in 2015. Covers white-collar crimes, anti-social forces, second generation religious issues, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, and the Imperial Household Agency. From autumn 2023, he will -
1
VERDICT: Philadelphia County Man Convicted of Sexual Abuse of a Young Child; Charged after Grand Jury Investigation...
by AndersonsInfo inhttps://www.attorneygeneral.gov/taking-action/verdict-philadelphia-county-man-convicted-of-sexual-abuse-of-a-young-child-charged-after-grand-jury-investigation-of-jehovahs-witnesses-congregation-members/.
verdict: philadelphia county man convicted of sexual abuse of a young child; charged after grand jury investigation of jehovah’s witnesses congregation members.
september 17, 2024 .
-
AndersonsInfo
VERDICT: Philadelphia County Man Convicted of Sexual Abuse of a Young Child; Charged after Grand Jury Investigation of Jehovah’s Witnesses Congregation Members
September 17, 2024HARRISBURG — Attorney General Michelle Henry announced that a Philadelphia County jury has convicted a man of all charges for the sexual abuse of a young child in 1998, when the defendant was a Jehovah’s Witness congregation member who utilized his position in the church to befriend the victim’s family.
David Balosa, 62, of Philadelphia, was convicted Monday of two felony counts of aggravated indecent assault and related misdemeanors, following a weeklong trial. Balosa will be sentenced on Jan. 27.
Balosa was arrested last year after the 49th Statewide Investigating Grand Jury recommended sexual assault-related charges against more than a dozen members of the Jehovah’s Witnesses faith who used the religion as a means to get close to victims.
“This defendant used religion to befriend a family — even moving in with them — before betraying their trust in the most heinous way, by abusing a very young child,” Attorney General Henry said. “We have a sworn obligation to protect our children and I commend the trial jury, as well as the grand jurors, for their time and attention to this case.”
According to testimony, the victim reported the abuse to their parents about 11 years after it happened. The parents confronted Balosa, who initially denied the allegation, but later admitted and asked for forgiveness.
The case was prosecuted by Deputy Attorney General Zachary Wynkoop.
-
11
New Zealand: Supreme Court dismisses Jehovah's Witnesses' final appeal for Abuse in Care exemption
by AndersonsInfo inhttps://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/528110/supreme-court-dismisses-jehovah-s-witnesses-final-appeal-for-abuse-in-care-exemption.
1:10 pm on 16 september 2024 .
anusha bradley, investigative reporter.
-
AndersonsInfo
1:10 pm on 16 September 2024
Anusha Bradley, Investigative Reporter
The Jehovah's Witnesses's final attempt to escape the Abuse in Care inquiry has been dismissed by the Supreme Court.
The Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses has repeatedly sought, and failed, to be exempted from the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care, arguing it did not have children in its care so was out of the inquiry's scope.
The court action was launched after three years of legal wrangling with the inquiry behind the scenes to avoid its scrutiny. The Court of Appeal dismissed the faith's argument in April, prompting it to apply for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court.
In a judgment issued on Friday, the Supreme Court rejected the faith's application, saying it agreed with the Court of Appeal's conclusions.
It also rejected an argument that there had been a "miscarriage of justice".
"Nor does anything raised by the Jehovah's Witnesses give rise to an appearance of a miscarriage of justice in the approach adopted by the Court of Appeal, particularly where the proposed appeal would be academic," the court said.
"The Commission has now released its report. The Jehovah's Witnesses can challenge the report of the Commission, as we understand it has done.".
The Commission's final report, which included a 74-page case study into the Jehovah's Witnesses, concluded the faith did have children or vulnerable people in its care and there was "credible evidence" of abuse.
The Supreme Court also chastised the church for filing a submission that exceeded the 10-page limit and ordered it to pay court costs of $2500 to the Crown.
The Jehovah's Witnesses have already agreed to pay $48,000 in court costs from a string of failed cases related to the inquiry and its final report.
The church has been approached for comment.
Former Jehovah's Witness-turned-advocate Shayne Mechen said the Supreme Court decision was "good news" for survivors of abuse within the church.
"Survivors will feel ecstatic it has finally come to an end and the JWs are no longer trying to escape scrutiny."
-
3
Article-Brazil: JW's ease punishment for pedophiles in manual
by AndersonsInfo inhttps://www.metropoles.com/brasil/testemunhas-de-jeova-punicao-pedofilos.
note: you can easily have google translate this excellent article from portuguese into english.
it's a very long article to read and i'm only posting a small part of it in english.
-
AndersonsInfo
https://www.metropoles.com/brasil/testemunhas-de-jeova-punicao-pedofilos
NOTE: You can easily have Google translate this excellent article from Portuguese into English. It's a very long article to read and I'm only posting a small part of it in English. (BA)
07/15/2024 02:00 ,updated07/15/2024 11:33
Jehovah's Witnesses ease punishment for pedophiles in manual
Jehovah's Witnesses' Doctrine Manual Only Judges Pedophiles in the Church If the Victim Has at Least Two Witnesses
“I went through two abuses in which I was not heard.” This is the story of one of the victims of a pedophilia complaint within the Christian denomination Jehovah’s Witnesses. At the time of the incident, she was only 10 years old and, according to her, she was ignored by the “court” of the doctrine because she did not bring witnesses who could confirm the crime suffered.
https://www.metropoles.com/brasil/testemunhas-de-jeova-punicao-pedofilos
The organization claims to abhor “child abuse” and considers it “a crime.”
However, publications support practices that make punishment more difficult. The magazine “The Watchtower – Announcing Jehovah’s Kingdom,” for example, serves as a handbook for congregation elders. One version states that at least two witnesses are required for a legal hearing to begin within the church against someone accused of child sexual abuse.
“This rule has a clearly discriminatory connotation against women and girls and allows the aggressor to continue committing this type of heinous crime,” explains the Public Prosecutor (MP-SP) and President of the Pró-Vítima Institute, Celeste Leite dos Santos.
According to her, as the crime occurs in secret, there are unlikely to be any witnesses.
“In addition to not protecting and welcoming the victim, it also encourages their revictimization and, often, the victim is punished by being expelled from the community. The problem is known to the leadership of the church based in the United States,” he argues.
Neglected victim
“I was seen as a fool who knew it was wrong but let it happen. In both cases [of abuse] I suffered, it was members of the congregation who committed it. They received no punishment. This makes me believe that the practice continues to be carried out,” says victim Mirela Costa, now 26 years old.
The church handbook relies on biblical interpretations to justify the need for multiple witnesses. A May 2019 issue of The Watchtower magazine states that this requirement is necessary “to maintain a high standard of justice.”
READ MORE: https://www.metropoles.com/brasil/testemunhas-de-jeova-punicao-pedofilos
-
2
The SPINOFF: These are the stories the Jehovah’s Witnesses went to court to stop you reading
by AndersonsInfo inhttps://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/25-07-2024/these-are-the-stories-the-jehovahs-witnesses-went-to-court-to-stop-you-reading?utm_source=spinoff-share-button&utm_medium=spinoff-web-mobile&fbclid=iwzxh0bgnhzw0cmteaar1yg_xczgpiel3at0lbzv5wu_p05ja_oenwvwplv1myb89dstgpfsrdzsw_aem_rjvb95lxmk1cvmzcvzpzjq.
friday, july 26, 2024toby manhire.
these are the stories the jehovah’s witnesses went to court to stop you reading.
-
AndersonsInfo
Friday, July 26, 2024
Toby ManhireThese are the stories the Jehovah’s Witnesses went to court to stop you reading
The inquiry expressed ‘concern about the faith’s overall approach to the safety of children and young people in its care’.
The stories below include accounts of sexual abuse.
It was the early 1980s and Ms SC, then 15, was a member of the New Zealand Jehovah’s Witness community. Elders in the church – a fundamentalist Christian group, which adopts a literal interpretation of its bible and believes Armageddon is imminent – were concerned about her behaviour. She was required to attend an Elder’s home for extra religious study, led by his wife.
“I would often be at their place after school or to go on outings. In addition to one-on-one bible studies with the Elder’s wife, I would join their family regularly for their family bible study,” she recalled.
When the tuition was over, the Elder “would drive me home”, said Ms SC. Except that, “instead of going home, he took me to another area nearby where there were no houses or anything at that time. This was when the abuse took place. It happened many times over a period of four to five months. At first he touched my genitals, then he digitally penetrated me, then he had full sexual intercourse with me.”
Ms SC’s story appears as part of a 64-page case study focused on Jehovah’s Witnesses in New Zealand, part of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in State Care, tabled yesterday in parliament. The church unsuccessfully applied to the Court of Appeal at the 11th hour to halt publication of the case study pending an application to the Supreme Court to appeal an earlier ruling. The application was denied.
Statements to the Royal Commission included descriptions of an arcane investigation process followed by the church. “Jasmine Grew told the inquiry that she had disclosed abuse [by a family member] to her mother in 1989, when she was 12 years old. Her mother told the Elders of her congregation ‘as she was expected’ to do. Soon after at a faith meeting, an Elder came up to Jasmine and said ‘we’d like to speak to you in the back room’.”
Grew said: “I went back into the back room and the elders [both male] were there. I had no support, no friend, no mother, nothing. My mother did not know, at the time, what was happening.”
She continued: “The elders interrogated me. They were asking the worst questions you can imagine, for someone who was just 12 years old. They asked me, ‘Was it hard,’ referring to my abuser physically. They wanted to know everything. Their questions were inappropriate. At that age it was a terrifying experience for me. It seemed as abusive as the sexual abuse itself … I was honest, and I told them everything because I had to be honest. I was fearful of the consequences of Armageddon. The two words that come to me still now are humiliation and embarrassment … [The Elders] were very intimidating. They made no attempt to support or comfort me in this process.”
READ MORE
-
22
Article - New Zealand: Jehovah's Witnesses lose last ditch court case over abuse in care report
by AndersonsInfo inhttps://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/522908/jehovah-s-witnesses-lose-last-ditch-court-case-over-abuse-in-care-report?fbclid=iwzxh0bgnhzw0cmteaar1g3qvzxlojo2szcm6xlsf2tsc_0rehd4dp4i6rda6zxafplc_v2hzvvf4_aem_pztghhvtf5to8qsjtv3m0g.
july 23, 2024. jehovah's witnesses lose last ditch court case over abuse in care report.
jehovah's witnesses have failed in an eleventh hour attempt to block part of a lengthy report about abuse in care that is about them.. .
-
22
Article - New Zealand: Jehovah's Witnesses lose last ditch court case over abuse in care report
by AndersonsInfo inhttps://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/522908/jehovah-s-witnesses-lose-last-ditch-court-case-over-abuse-in-care-report?fbclid=iwzxh0bgnhzw0cmteaar1g3qvzxlojo2szcm6xlsf2tsc_0rehd4dp4i6rda6zxafplc_v2hzvvf4_aem_pztghhvtf5to8qsjtv3m0g.
july 23, 2024. jehovah's witnesses lose last ditch court case over abuse in care report.
jehovah's witnesses have failed in an eleventh hour attempt to block part of a lengthy report about abuse in care that is about them.. .
-
AndersonsInfo
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/522908/jehovah-s-witnesses-lose-last-ditch-court-case-over-abuse-in-care-report?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1g3qVZxlojO2SzcM6Xlsf2tsC_0REhD4dP4I6rDA6zxAFPLc_v2hZVvf4_aem_PztGhHVTf5To8QsJTv3m0g
JULY 23, 2024
Jehovah's Witnesses lose last ditch court case over abuse in care report
Jehovah's Witnesses have failed in an eleventh hour attempt to block part of a lengthy report about abuse in care that is about them.Recommendations from a report into abuse that occurred in state and faith-based care will be made public on Wednesday.
On Friday, the Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses Australasia filed for interim orders in the Court of Appeal to prevent part of the report about them from being published until their Supreme Court appeal is decided.
They filed to avoid scrutiny altogether.
They asked that part of the final report, a case study on Jehovah's Witnesses, not be published on the Royal Commission's website, that it be kept confidential and not reported on.
Justice Cooke declined the application in a judgement released on Tuesday, citing "considerable public interest" in the report and the fact they had waited till the "very last moment".
He also said the chances of their success in the Supreme Court "must be regarded as low".
Justice Cooke noted no affidavit evidence was filed by the Jehovah's Witnesses in support of the application.
"We nevertheless accept that the appellant has a position to preserve," he said.
"Publicising the section of the report dealing with the issue of abuse by members of the Jehovah's Witnesses faith will likely have a reputational impact on the appellant, and the faith more generally."
He said any subsequent decision of the Supreme Court concluding that it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Royal Commission to make such findings may mitigate that impact, but would not eliminate it.
"Having said that, we do not understand there to be a dispute that the Royal Commission received evidence of abuse engaged in by members of the Jehovah's Witnesses faith," Cooke said.
"The appellant's argument in this proceeding has been limited to arguing that the Royal Commission does not have jurisdiction to investigate and report on that abuse because it did not take place in a relevant "care" setting.
"But we nevertheless accept that the proposed order can be seen as necessary to preserve the appellant's position."
A spokesperson for the Australasian Branch of Jehovah's Witnesses said in a statement: "We have serious concerns about the accuracy of the report regarding Jehovah's Witnesses and have no choice but to resort to court to address these issues. READ MORE
-
12
Russia: Further Jail Term For Answering Fellow Prisoners’ Questions About Faith
by AndersonsInfo inhttps://www.eurasiareview.com/01072024-russia-further-jail-term-for-answering-fellow-prisoners-questions-about-faith/.
july 1, 2024. by f18news.
by victoria arnold.
-
AndersonsInfo
July 1, 2024
By F18News
By Victoria Arnold
RUSSIA: Further Jail Term For Answering Fellow Prisoners’ Questions About Faith
Jehovah’s Witness prisoner of conscience Dmitry Terebilov, who has been serving a sentence in a strict-regime labour camp (penal colony) in Kostroma Region, is currently on trial again for having answered questions about his faith from a fellow prisoner. The camp administration has recordings of his conversations. If found guilty, he could receive a further sentence of several years, on top of his present 3-year term.
There have so far been seven hearings, all postponed or adjourned for a variety of reasons. Terebilov is next due to appear in court on 8 August.
Investigators charged 44-year-old Terebilov with “Inclination, recruitment or other involvement of a person in an extremist organisation” (Criminal Code Article 282.2, Part 1.1) and “Participating in a banned extremist organisation” (Article 282.2, Part 2) in December 2023 when he was already jailed (see below).
Although several other Jehovah’s Witnesses have been subject to multiple prosecutions, these investigations and trials have generally overlapped. Terebilov appears to be the first person to be prosecuted for an incident unrelated to the activity which led to his first conviction, and which took place well after the conclusion of his previous case, when he was already imprisoned (see below).
“The only reason for [the initiation of the case] was the fact that the believer answered his cellmate’s questions about Jehovah’s Witness beliefs”, the European Association of Jehovah’s Witnesses noted on 21 June 2023, shortly after it became known that Terebilov was under investigation.