"The Scarlet Coloured Wild Beast and Friends"
DannyHaszard
JoinedPosts by DannyHaszard
-
12
Watchtower spokesman likens the organization to the United Nations.
by nicolaou inokay, it's only fluff but i liked it.. osceola will host jehovah's witnesses.
by danielle de pari.
sentinel staff writer.
-
-
-
12
Watchtower spokesman likens the organization to the United Nations.
by nicolaou inokay, it's only fluff but i liked it.. osceola will host jehovah's witnesses.
by danielle de pari.
sentinel staff writer.
-
-
DannyHaszard
Whether its a hoax or not, it has still got the JWs talking over in England! http://www.thepowerhour.com/articles/ban_1.htm
Would Effectively Ban Religion
Alert: Listeners and Readers: The UN was contacted and they say this is a HOAX!
A draft resolution which aims to secure global peace and stability at the expense of organized religion is today being submitted to the United Nations in New York.
http://www.formulism.org , a site which claims that freedom FROM religion would be of far greater benefit to mankind than freedom OF religion.
(now unavailable the last I checked)
United Nations, S-378
New York, NY 10017
Tel. 212-963-7162
Fax. 212-963-7055
[email protected]------------------------------ Watchtower Sluts the 'wild beast'
-
9
Barry Verdict WT LOSES PUBLIC OPINION
by DannyHaszard inconcord monitor, nh - 29 minutes ago .
the case involved two children whose family belonged to a jehovah's witness congregation in wilton.
paul berry ...
-
-
DannyHaszard
SF thanks for your assist.The material is up just a bit annoying to view.
Tell the truth and don't be afraid-Danny Haszard Bangor Maine
-
13
Jehovah Witnesses in the News
by Legolas in.
i just got this new 'news' in my email ( i have google alert for jehovah witness ).
http://www.cmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?aid=/20050719/repository/507190327/1029/opinion03
-
-
DannyHaszard
Reporting abuse
Concord Monitor, NH - 3 hours ago
... some key questions. The case involved two children whose family belonged to a Jehovah's Witness congregation in Wilton. Paul Berry ...This is the one we have been waiting for,this is the newspaper management speaking.
-
9
Barry Verdict WT LOSES PUBLIC OPINION
by DannyHaszard inconcord monitor, nh - 29 minutes ago .
the case involved two children whose family belonged to a jehovah's witness congregation in wilton.
paul berry ...
-
-
DannyHaszard
(Lets see if it will copy this time.) Reporting abuse
Concord Monitor, NH - 29 minutes ago
... some key questions. The case involved two children whose family belonged to a Jehovah's Witness congregation in Wilton. Paul Berry ...
Monitor editorialReporting abuse Law created to protect children needs to be strengthened.
July 20. 2005 8:00AM
The case raised a host of issues that the three-judge majority - Chief Justice John Broderick and Justices James Duggan and Joseph Nadeau -declined to address. (Justice Richard Galway did not sit, and Justice Linda Dalianis dissented from a major portion of the decision.)
ew Hampshire law requires any person with reason to suspect a child has been abused or neglected to report those suspicions to law enforcement authorities. But the law is unclear about when exceptions apply, and a split decision issued last week by the state Supreme Court did little to clarify matters. It is imperative that the Legislature, which has been a leader in the fight to end child sex abuse and domestic violence, act quickly to answer some key questions. The case involved two children whose family belonged to a Jehovah's Witness congregation in Wilton. Paul Berry began abusing his daughter and stepdaughter when one child was 10 and the other 3, according to court records. Berry was convicted of abuse and is serving a 56- to 112-year prison sentence. The children, now adults, sued the church for damages. The story is all the more tragic because their mother claims she reported her suspicions to church elders on a dozen occasions, including several meetings when her husband was present. She was told, she said, "to be silent about the abuse and be a better wife." The elders - who are elected and unpaid - never reported the alleged abuse to authorities and, according to the mother, reminded her that such matters should be handled by the church and not secular authorities.N The reporting law requires all citizens to report suspected abuse, though clergy who learn of the abuse during a confession or similar privileged conversation are exempt. The case did not clarify whether elders in the Jehovah's church or other religious leaders who have no special training enjoy the religious exemption accorded to clergy. Nor did it clarify what constitutes a privileged conversation.
High courts attempt to avoid deciding constitutional issues and rule first on matters of statutory and common law. So the majority held that since the reporting law made provision only for criminal penalties, not civil ones, the elders could not be held liable.
Dalianis disagreed. The church, she wrote, enjoyed a "special relationship"with the children that imposed a common-law duty on the elders to report the abuse or to at least advise the mother to report it. The elders, Dalianis said, facilitated the continuing abuse by counseling the mother to be silent. If that's true, the question becomes why aren't the church's leaders facing criminal charges?
There are no easy answers to the questions the case raises. But the next session of the Legislature needs to spell out when church leaders must live up to the reporting law and when they are exempt. It should also clarify when it is appropriate to sue for civil damages caused by a failure to report abuse.
Peter Hutchins, a lawyer who settled 200 cases against the Roman Catholic Diocese of Manchester, believes that had those suits been filed after the Berry ruling, many victims who were not altar boys, at church camps or in some other direct relationship with the church would not have been able to seek damages. Hutchins estimates that as many as 15 percent of his clients would have been left with no recourse.
That possibility is certainly not in the interest of society. The Legislature should use the court ruling as a starting point for debate and act quickly to strengthen this important law.
------ End of article
Monitor editorial
------------------------------
News departments
Newsroom Phone: 603-224-5301 ext. 670
Fax: 603-224-8120
E-mail: [email protected]Letters to the editor Fax: 603-224-8120 ("Attn: Letters to editor")
E-mail: [email protected]Footnote from:Danny Haszard i have a working correspondence with the staff of the Concord Monitor (New Hampshire) "do not discount the power of one" and i am not the only one - Zech 4:10
-
9
Barry Verdict WT LOSES PUBLIC OPINION
by DannyHaszard inconcord monitor, nh - 29 minutes ago .
the case involved two children whose family belonged to a jehovah's witness congregation in wilton.
paul berry ...
-
-
DannyHaszard
Family ill served by Witness elders, VICTORIA CATER, Henniker ...
Concord Monitor, NH - Jul 19, 2005
feel for the mother and sisters who were so misguided by the Jehovah's Witness organization regarding being abused. I am no stranger ...This is from yesterday same paper
-
9
Barry Verdict WT LOSES PUBLIC OPINION
by DannyHaszard inconcord monitor, nh - 29 minutes ago .
the case involved two children whose family belonged to a jehovah's witness congregation in wilton.
paul berry ...
-
-
DannyHaszard
Reporting abuse
Concord Monitor, NH - 29 minutes ago
... some key questions. The case involved two children whose family belonged to a Jehovah's Witness congregation in Wilton. Paul Berry ...
Monitor editorialReporting abuse Law created to protect children needs to be strengthened.
July 20. 2005 8:00AM
The case raised a host of issues that the three-judge majority - Chief Justice John Broderick and Justices James Duggan and Joseph Nadeau -declined to address. (Justice Richard Galway did not sit, and Justice Linda Dalianis dissented from a major portion of the decision.)
ew Hampshire law requires any person with reason to suspect a child has been abused or neglected to report those suspicions to law enforcement authorities. But the law is unclear about when exceptions apply, and a split decision issued last week by the state Supreme Court did little to clarify matters.N It is imperative that the Legislature, which has been a leader in the fight to end child sex abuse and domestic violence, act quickly to answer some key questions.
The case involved two children whose family belonged to a Jehovah's Witness congregation in Wilton. Paul Berry began abusing his daughter and stepdaughter when one child was 10 and the other 3, according to court records.
Berry was convicted of abuse and is serving a 56- to 112-year prison sentence. The children, now adults, sued the church for damages.
The story is all the more tragic because their mother claims she reported her suspicions to church elders on a dozen occasions, including several meetings when her husband was present. She was told, she said, "to be silent about the abuse and be a better wife." The elders - who are elected and unpaid - never reported the alleged abuse to authorities and, according to the mother, reminded her that such matters should be handled by the church and not secular authorities.
The reporting law requires all citizens to report suspected abuse, though clergy who learn of the abuse during a confession or similar privileged conversation are exempt. The case did not clarify whether elders in the Jehovah's church or other religious leaders who have no special training enjoy the religious exemption accorded to clergy. Nor did it clarify what constitutes a privileged conversation .
High courts attempt to avoid deciding constitutional issues and rule first on matters of statutory and common law. So the majority held that since the reporting law made provision only for criminal penalties, not civil ones, the elders could not be held liable.
Dalianis disagreed. The church, she wrote, enjoyed a "special relationship"with the children that imposed a common-law duty on the elders to report the abuse or to at least advise the mother to report it. The elders, Dalianis said, facilitated the continuing abuse by counseling the mother to be silent. If that's true, the question becomes why aren't the church's leaders facing criminal charges?
There are no easy answers to the questions the case raises. But the next session of the Legislature needs to spell out when church leaders must live up to the reporting law and when they are exempt. It should also clarify when it is appropriate to sue for civil damages caused by a failure to report abuse.
Peter Hutchins, a lawyer who settled 200 cases against the Roman Catholic Diocese of Manchester, believes that had those suits been filed after the Berry ruling, many victims who were not altar boys, at church camps or in some other direct relationship with the church would not have been able to seek damages. Hutchins estimates that as many as 15 percent of his clients would have been left with no recourse.
That possibility is certainly not in the interest of society. The Legislature should use the court ruling as a starting point for debate and act quickly to strengthen this important law.
------ End of article
Monitor editorial
------------------------------
News departments
Newsroom Phone: 603-224-5301 ext. 670
Fax: 603-224-8120
E-mail: [email protected]Letters to the editor Fax: 603-224-8120 ("Attn: Letters to editor")
E-mail: [email protected]Footnote from:Danny Haszard i have a working correspondence with the staff of the Concord Monitor (New Hampshire) "do not discount the power of one" and i am not the only one - Zech 4:10
-
29
Berry verdict and what YOU can do
by rebel8 in.
it is really sad and shocking that the court did not rule in the girls favor.
elsewhere posted the link to the court documents in another thread, but here it is again: http://www.courts.state.nh.us/supreme/opinions/2005/berry081.htm .
-
-
DannyHaszard
Reporting abuse
Concord Monitor, NH - 29 minutes ago
... some key questions. The case involved two children whose family belonged to a Jehovah's Witness congregation in Wilton. Paul Berry ...
Monitor editorialReporting abuse Law created to protect children needs to be strengthened.
July 20. 2005 8:00AM
The case raised a host of issues that the three-judge majority - Chief Justice John Broderick and Justices James Duggan and Joseph Nadeau -declined to address. (Justice Richard Galway did not sit, and Justice Linda Dalianis dissented from a major portion of the decision.)
ew Hampshire law requires any person with reason to suspect a child has been abused or neglected to report those suspicions to law enforcement authorities. But the law is unclear about when exceptions apply, and a split decision issued last week by the state Supreme Court did little to clarify matters.N It is imperative that the Legislature, which has been a leader in the fight to end child sex abuse and domestic violence, act quickly to answer some key questions.
The case involved two children whose family belonged to a Jehovah's Witness congregation in Wilton. Paul Berry began abusing his daughter and stepdaughter when one child was 10 and the other 3, according to court records.
Berry was convicted of abuse and is serving a 56- to 112-year prison sentence. The children, now adults, sued the church for damages.
The story is all the more tragic because their mother claims she reported her suspicions to church elders on a dozen occasions, including several meetings when her husband was present. She was told, she said, "to be silent about the abuse and be a better wife." The elders - who are elected and unpaid - never reported the alleged abuse to authorities and, according to the mother, reminded her that such matters should be handled by the church and not secular authorities.
The reporting law requires all citizens to report suspected abuse, though clergy who learn of the abuse during a confession or similar privileged conversation are exempt. The case did not clarify whether elders in the Jehovah's church or other religious leaders who have no special training enjoy the religious exemption accorded to clergy. Nor did it clarify what constitutes a privileged conversation .
High courts attempt to avoid deciding constitutional issues and rule first on matters of statutory and common law. So the majority held that since the reporting law made provision only for criminal penalties, not civil ones, the elders could not be held liable.
Dalianis disagreed. The church, she wrote, enjoyed a "special relationship"with the children that imposed a common-law duty on the elders to report the abuse or to at least advise the mother to report it. The elders, Dalianis said, facilitated the continuing abuse by counseling the mother to be silent. If that's true, the question becomes why aren't the church's leaders facing criminal charges?
There are no easy answers to the questions the case raises. But the next session of the Legislature needs to spell out when church leaders must live up to the reporting law and when they are exempt. It should also clarify when it is appropriate to sue for civil damages caused by a failure to report abuse.
Peter Hutchins, a lawyer who settled 200 cases against the Roman Catholic Diocese of Manchester, believes that had those suits been filed after the Berry ruling, many victims who were not altar boys, at church camps or in some other direct relationship with the church would not have been able to seek damages. Hutchins estimates that as many as 15 percent of his clients would have been left with no recourse.
That possibility is certainly not in the interest of society. The Legislature should use the court ruling as a starting point for debate and act quickly to strengthen this important law.
------ End of article
Monitor editorial
------------------------------
News departments
Newsroom Phone: 603-224-5301 ext. 670
Fax: 603-224-8120
E-mail: [email protected]Letters to the editor Fax: 603-224-8120 ("Attn: Letters to editor")
E-mail: [email protected]Footnote from:Danny Haszard i have a working correspondence with the staff of the Concord Monitor (New Hampshire) "do not discount the power of one" and i am not the only one - Zech 4:10
-
11
Does WT doctrine incite TERRORISM?
by Smiles in.
there are volumes of wt writings, artist renderings and other material that make it very clear that the wt is eagerly anticipating the mass destruction of governmental, religious and commercial systems, their buildings, along with the billions of people that adhere to them.. combine the wt doctrine with the emotional oppression and enmity created by the divisive, nonconformist practices of the wt and you have the makings of terrorist motivations.. if a jw or group of jws were to ever go ballistic and act out in a massively destructive attack in society, do you think the wt doctrine would be held liable on the world scene?
-
-
DannyHaszard
Thank you SF here is the rest of the thread http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/14/93297/1.ashx Apostates 'R terrorist They have slashed my truck tires many times and filed perjured false police complaints (a felony to do so) against me to have me arrested Keep in mind i have Nothing to lose and will go all the way if they do anything assaultive.They soul raped 4 generations of my family.I am like a nazi holocaust survivor turned nazi hunter.They will not win in a court of law or public opinion i have seen to that.The WT will have so much egg on their face it will look like an omelet They want a piece of me come and get it NO TRESPASSING SIGNS
Watch new special about stalkers 2/19/05 -
5
A developing threat to the Society's growth - Africa gets old PC's
by truthseeker inlooks like africa will be catching up soon, with the rest of the online community.
it's only a matter of time before some african student.
googles "jehovah's witness".
-
-
DannyHaszard
Refugee Problem Blamed On FDLR
AllAfrica.com, Africa - 6 hours ago
... They singled out Jehovah's Witnesses Church which discourages members from participating in night patrols and Gacaca court proceedings. ...AllAfrica has frequent news clips on Africa's big cult problem.I correspond with them every time,join in and and contribute too.