I asked you whether such confidential information leaked out BEFORE or AFTER action was taken.
AuldSoul--In what is most likely a useless attempt to help you see that you don't know everything there is to know, the answer is--on many occasions--BEFORE. Is that clear enough for you?
I'm speaking of confidential matters in general--not sex abuse cases. In the half-dozen congregations that I was associated with during my lifetime, I only know of one incidence of alleged molestation. It was from a questionable source and the accused was not an elder. And to once again address your burning concern, I was aware of the situation BEFORE any action was taken. No I didn't know the bloody details of what was said in confidential meetings--I knew the jist of the accusations (as did most of the people in the congregation).
While it's certainly possible that there may have been other such incidents that I was not made aware of, the likelihood that there were enough of them to constitute the sort of grand scale which would justify characterizing JW's en masse as "nasty, child-abusers" is nil, zero, zilch. Comprende?