Fisherman,
I presume that you are trying to suggest that I don't know the meaning of the word documented, however, I was responding to the use in your initial post of the words documenting and reporting. The use of these words is intended to give the reader of your post the impression that the bible writers were unbiased reporters. The facts are that the bible writers were not reporters hence the widely dissimilar writing styles throughout the book. You are also ignoring the vast amount of time that the stories presented were passed on verbally and the length of time between the events happening and the time of writing.
I assume your difficulty in comprehending this is perhaps understandable given the poor writing, woeful grammar and incomprehensible sentence structure in the second part of your response to me.
There are a number of differences in the way that Newtonian physics and relativity work. Newtonian physics works very well for physics as we experience them here on earth, so much so that they are still used by engineers and physicists the world over. However they start to break down when you look at the application in scenarios that involve large gravitational speeds and velocities approaching the speed of light, hence planetary orbital calculations using purely Newtonian physics are not as accurate as calculations that take account of relativity.
The best example of relativity in the modern life is the fact that Newtonian physics would not predict any difference between a clock here on earth and one in orbit. Relativity predicts that the clock nearer to a large gravitational field would run more slowly. In order for GPS satellites to work the on-board clocks have to take this difference into account.
Newtonian physics also does not take into account the fact that all motion is relative and that the speed of light is constant no matter what the observer is doing. If for example you were in a spacecraft travelling at the speed of light and shone a torch out of the front window then Newtonian physics would say that you would see a beam of light out of the window. Relativity states that the beam of light would travel at the speed of light, the same as your spacecraft and hence never leave the torch.
I hope that is a sufficiently simple explanation of the differences, I have assumed that is the question you were trying to ask when you referred to the tangencies between the two. I ought to point out that tangencies actually implies the common points between the two theories but I tried not to read too much into your use of the word!
Since you so very kindly allowed me to believe what I like about your posts I will also assume that I am free to state that you are very badly in need of a remedial class in English comprehension and a good dictionary.