What happened was accurately if clinically described, with no condemnation from Pink News journalists.
That is what a journalist is supposed to do, it is up to the reader to decide their own reaction not for the journalist to dictate, within journalism it is the path usually taken when reporting the most egregious acts as it is usually unnecessary to point out the horror when extreme stories are being reported.
'Shockingly racist’ UKIP-backed Brexit ad features Donald Trump comparing migrants to snakes
The meaning of the headline is clearly referring to the brexit ad as being shockingly racist not UKIP, feel free to read the article to confirm.
Sadiq Khan does not want exemption from Trump’s ‘ignorant’ Muslim ban
Again the headline clearly calls the proposed ban on Muslims ignorant not Donald Trump, feel free to read the article to confirm.
Pink News journalists can call UKIP 'shockingly racist' and Trump 'ignorant' but they are unwilling or unable to express outrage/condemnation or be judgemental when extremists throw gays of tall buildings.
Since the slightest research reveals that neither of your two statements are correct, can we assume that you are now happy with their consistent reporting of facts inline with common reporting norms.