National Geographic and the Evolutionists have been wrong before and they are wrong again. Remember that dino bird fossil? Of course you heard about the dino bird fossil. Lots of hype about the NG article on the news but when it was proved to be handmade by the Chinese who knew the scientists would pay a lot for it... there was no follow up. When it was proved a fake you could hear crickets from the scientific community , they were so embarassed. No press conference when National Geographic had to retract the lie.
Under_Believer said humans were not here 3 million years ago? I agree. That's because the earth wasn't here 3 million years ago. Just like God made Adam an adult , not a baby... he made the universe with the appearance of age. I mean why would he make stars millions of light years away, ,never to be seen by human eyes? He made the light from them to already reach earth the instant he made them. Scientists HAVE to date things very old otherwise there would not be enough time to support their evolution theory. Even though Mt. St. Helen (volcano) erupted in the 1980s , its newly formed rocks were tested to be millions of years old. Embarassing for the geologists but true.
Under_Believer please check out the information on this modern human fossil KNMER 1470. It was found in Kenya, completely human and aged to be about 2 - 4 million years old. There are all kinds of these anamolies... called polystyrate (not sure of spelling) fossils. These are Fossils that don't FIT the evolution timeline, like flowering tree fossils found upright crossing through various rock strats representing millions of years. Maybe you've heard about the small mammal in the stomach of the dinosaur fossil?
Also... how about those living fossils.... animals and plants that NEVER evolved and are still with us today? coleocanth fish, red maple, croccodile, ginko tree etc....
Just because this primate fossil looks somewhat human doesn't make it our ancestor. By their logic just because 2 cars or 2 chairs look alike.... so that would mean one is the ancestor of the other. Errr, no.... It means they have a common design