Come On France, let us dream another time !!!
chasson
JoinedPosts by chasson
-
209
OFFICIAL WORLD CUP THREAD! "here we go, here we go, here we go"!
by nicolaou inless than 2 hours before it all starts and a quarter of the earth's population will be watching!
- c'mon you americans, get on board.
germany kick-off against costa rica at 5pm to be followed by poland v ecuador at 8pm (bst)
-
-
279
Golden Age Goodies
by Leolaia inrecently i had the pleasure to examine a stash of 1920s and 1930s golden age magazines, among the rarest of watchtower publications.
i thought it would be a fun idea to have a thread in which i share with you some of the amazing, ridiculous, hilarious things contained therein.
hence, this is the first post of a series of excerpts, scans, etc.
-
chasson
Dear Leolia and dilaceratus,
Have you find something concerning the claim of Rutherford in one of the Vindication Book, concerning the Rothshilds
The Rothshilds were european banker, it is surprising that Rutherford cited some of letters of Rothshilds to a banker in USA, as a proof of a conspiracy of the Big Business. At this time, even if the Rothshilds made money in USA, it was not their area of work.
I still believe that we can find where Rutherford took his idea concerning the catholic's conspiracy, if we can find where he has found this letter's extracts.
Bye
Charles -
279
Golden Age Goodies
by Leolaia inrecently i had the pleasure to examine a stash of 1920s and 1930s golden age magazines, among the rarest of watchtower publications.
i thought it would be a fun idea to have a thread in which i share with you some of the amazing, ridiculous, hilarious things contained therein.
hence, this is the first post of a series of excerpts, scans, etc.
-
chasson
I will scan other GOlden Age i have, for example the one where Woodworth wants to make his theocratic calendar, it is really funny !!!
Bye
Charles -
279
Golden Age Goodies
by Leolaia inrecently i had the pleasure to examine a stash of 1920s and 1930s golden age magazines, among the rarest of watchtower publications.
i thought it would be a fun idea to have a thread in which i share with you some of the amazing, ridiculous, hilarious things contained therein.
hence, this is the first post of a series of excerpts, scans, etc.
-
chasson
One of my scan of the Golden Age of November 4 1936:
http://cchasson.free.fr/deposit/GA/Golden%20Age%204%20Novembre%201936.pdf
Bye
Charles -
209
OFFICIAL WORLD CUP THREAD! "here we go, here we go, here we go"!
by nicolaou inless than 2 hours before it all starts and a quarter of the earth's population will be watching!
- c'mon you americans, get on board.
germany kick-off against costa rica at 5pm to be followed by poland v ecuador at 8pm (bst)
-
chasson
Come on France, Come on Zidane, i hope that it will not be your last match !!!
Now Riberi could be a big danger.
Brazil is the biggest team of this world cup. So even if France could really not win, it will be a great match.
Bye
Charles -
15
BIG JW PEDO NEWS in switzerland
by chasson incondemned witnesses of jehovah (28/06/2006) .
during 20 years, daniel deceived children under the glance of his wife.
brussels condemned for sordid facts of rapes, daniel p. and nadine nr.
-
chasson
Well, just quickly, my son is born today, his name is Colas, and i think i have no time to answer in detail to your question yet, sorry Nelly.
If i remember correctly in the Dutroux's scandal, Michelle martin, his wife, was a JW or perhaps someone who has studied with JW.
And true it was in Belgium.
Well, i will be back in few days.
Bye
Charles -
15
BIG JW PEDO NEWS in switzerland
by chasson incondemned witnesses of jehovah (28/06/2006) .
during 20 years, daniel deceived children under the glance of his wife.
brussels condemned for sordid facts of rapes, daniel p. and nadine nr.
-
chasson
Condemned witnesses of Jéhovah (28/06/2006)
During 20 years, Daniel deceived children under the glance of his wife. Tens of victims…
BRUSSELS Condemned for sordid facts of rapes, Daniel P. and Nadine NR. formed a couple of witnesses of Jéhovah.
Yesterday, Daniel P. bailed out 6 years of firm prison. Nadine was condemned to 3 years, with complete deferment.
Severe sorrows for facts of an extreme gravity. See rather: 11 minor victims of indecent assaults, 7 breaches of trust on the Net and two rapes. According to the charge, tens of children are victims. Some undoubtedly did not find the force to deposit felt sorry for. The abuses were spread out over one 20 years extraordinarily long period.
The perversity of Daniel did not have any limit. But what is more still shocking, it is the passivity of his wife. Nadine NR. admitted having been pilot of certain scenes but it was keep silent. She acknowledged to have heard the children groan and shout whereas they were constrained to share the bed of prevented. She has it surprised besides in erection in the room in the presence of the children.
She did not want to have sexual intercourse any more with her husband and thus yielded “readily” her place in the marital bed.
Today still, it granted its forgiveness to him. With the audience, both prevented wanted to intertwine, as they did at the end of the debates. This time, that their was refused. They will be able to be seen… in prison.
The file bursts in May 2005 when two young women denounce the facts. The first abuses go back to 1986. The couple attempted to give a good image in the district. Thus it rendered service by accomodating the children when the parents were with work.
With the years, the predator Daniel P. adapted his techniques. It thus tamed Internet for still misusing, in particular while being made pass for a teenager and while fixing go to girls. On the spot, it affirmed being the uncle of the teenager.
With the wire of hearings, prevented minimized the facts. Better still, it rejected the fault on his wife, or the victims by regarding them as prostitutes whereas certain victims were only 4 years old. It also rejected the fault… on the authorities which did not react in time.
Yesterday, with the audience, a victim was present. It could not constitute civil part, because the abuses relating to it were prescribed. A reality difficult to accept. His/her mother, it, had also a thought for another young man of the district which gave itself death. Without apparent reason. It wonders whether, him also, would not have been misused.
Philippe Boudart
From http://www.dhnet.be/dhinfos/article.phtml?id=151625 -
2
Switzerland: The Jw against a TV show denouncing them
by chasson infrom http://www.news-service.admin.ch/nsbsubscriber/message/fr/5765 (automatic translation) .
time present on the witnesses of jehovah .
the plaintiffs estimated in particular that the presentation of the sexual abuse in the report violated the faithful principle of presentation of the events.
-
chasson
From http://www.news-service.admin.ch/NSBSubscriber/message/fr/5765 (Automatic translation)
„Time Present “on the Witnesses of Jéhovah
Bern, 23.06.2006 (AIRR) - the Authority independent of examination of the complaints as regards radio-television (AIEP) rejected a complaint directed against the report „Témoins silencer “diffused within the framework of the emission „Temps Present “of French-speaking Switzerland Television (TSR). The disputed report did not violate the faithful principle of presentation of the events.
The committed journalist is licit when it is presented like such and that it satisfies more severe journalistic requirements. When a completely abroad elaborate emission is repeated in Switzerland, it is held to conform to the Swiss right of the programs. It is what AIEP in its last decision notenoted.
Heading „Pilot silencers “, the report blamed was bought Swedish and was on television diffused on July 14, 2005 on the first chain of the TSR. It is about an investigation into the silence which règnerait within the Swedish organization of the Witnesses of Jéhovah when certain members are suspected of sexual abuse nature paedophile. The report includes/understands in particular the testimony of children victims. The plaintiffs estimated in particular that the presentation of the sexual abuse in the report violated the faithful principle of presentation of the events.
The disputed report - which raises of committed journalism - addresses many criticisms to the Witnesses of Jéhovah. For AIEP, the point of view of the latter however was sufficiently exposed, in conformity with the right of the programs. The Authority of complaint recalls moreover which the presenter of the emission clearly stated that the report did not aim the Swiss community. Indeed, following a request of the plaintiffs who estimated that it did not appear in a clear way that only the Witnesses of Jéhovah of Sweden were aimed by this emission, the journalist specified in his comment at the beginning of emission that it was about a business which did not relate to of anything the Swiss community witnesses of Jéhovah. It also recalled at the end of the emission that the Witnesses of Jéhovah judged this report libelous and untrue „“.
During its diffusion in Sweden, the report was the subject of two complaints, which were rejected except on a precise point having milked at the age of one of the imposters. The comment of the diffused emission was modified by the TSR, eliminating any ambiguity. In its comment at the end of the report, the TSR declared that the Witnesses of Swedish Jéhovah „tried to obtain the judgment of the report “, but that the judges „finally gave reason to the authors of this investigation “. This information corresponded only partly to reality, the Commission of the complaints having established the error made by the report on the age of the author of the abuses, considered according to it a violation of the requirement for objectivity. The silence of the TSR, on this point, is a fault. This one is however only secondary insofar as it does not affect in an important way the overall impression which emerges from the emission. Moreover, the TSR removed ambiguity by modifying its comment.
The faithful principle of presentation of the events was thus not violated. The complaint was rejected by eight vote against one. The decisions of AIEP can be submitted with the federal Court by the way of a recourse of administrative law.
Authority independent of examination of the complaints as regards radio-television,
Post-office box 8547, 3001 Bern (Tel.: 031/322' 55' 33/38);
http://www.ubi.admin.ch -
279
Golden Age Goodies
by Leolaia inrecently i had the pleasure to examine a stash of 1920s and 1930s golden age magazines, among the rarest of watchtower publications.
i thought it would be a fun idea to have a thread in which i share with you some of the amazing, ridiculous, hilarious things contained therein.
hence, this is the first post of a series of excerpts, scans, etc.
-
chasson
I will add slowly 5 different scans of Golden Age i have on my site, please wait, i am in the half of the first one.
The November 4, 1936.
Bye
Charles -
9
Wife beating during 20 years and fiduciary duty
by chasson inwife, a member of the jehovahs witnesses, sued watchtower society and church elders alleging that the church and the individual defendants failed to render assistance to her when she was consistently and repeatedly beaten by her husband over a period of 20 years; actions for intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress and for breach of fiduciary duty time barred; limitation periods not tolled by the doctrine of fraudulent concealment; church teaching that members were not to resort to lawsuits did not postpone the running of the limitations periods until plaintiffs expulsion from the church; however, the claim for breach of implied contract to protect plaintiff so long as she was obedient to the church was timely because the alleged breach could be considered to have occurred on the date of plaintiffs expulsion from the church; but the claim for breach of implied contract was barred by the first amendment case # 801 (10/00) (conn. super.
ct.) (for collateral proceeding in the same case, see index entry in the next paragraph) .
wife, a member of the jehovahs witnesses, sued watchtower society and church elders alleging that the church and the individual defendants failed to render assistance to her when she was consistently and repeatedly abused by her husband for nearly 20 years, but counseled her to continue to endure in the marriage.
-
chasson
Wife, a member of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, sued Watchtower Society and church elders alleging that the church and the individual defendants failed to render assistance to her when she was consistently and repeatedly beaten by her husband over a period of 20 years; actions for intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress and for breach of fiduciary duty time barred; limitation periods not tolled by the doctrine of fraudulent concealment; church teaching that members were not to resort to lawsuits did not postpone the running of the limitations periods until plaintiff’s expulsion from the church; however, the claim for breach of implied contract to protect plaintiff so long as she was obedient to the church was timely because the alleged breach could be considered to have occurred on the date of plaintiff’s expulsion from the church; but the claim for breach of implied contract was barred by the First Amendment Case # 801 (10/00) (Conn. Super. Ct.) (for collateral proceeding in the same case, see index entry in the next paragraph)
Wife, a member of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, sued Watchtower Society and church elders alleging that the church and the individual defendants failed to render assistance to her when she was consistently and repeatedly abused by her husband for nearly 20 years, but counseled her to continue to endure in the marriage. Plaintiff also alleged that defendant elders voiced derogatory remarks about her until her “disfellowship” in April, 1996. Summary judgment granted to defendants on plaintiff’s actions for intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress. In action for intentional infliction of emotional distress, limitation period of three years barred consideration of allegations of events occurring prior to March, 1995. Church teaching that members were not to resort to lawsuits did not postpone the running of the limitations periods until plaintiff’s expulsion from the church. As to alleged events that occurred within the three year limitations period, derogatory remarks about and verbal mistreatment of plaintiff in the course of the disfellowship proceedings were not “extreme and outrageous.” Conduct on the part of the defendant that is merely insulting or displays bad manners or results in hurt feelings is insufficient to form the basis for an action based upon intentional infliction of emotional distress. Action for negligent infliction of emotional distress was in effect a claim for clergy malpractice barred by the free exercise and establishment clauses of the First Amendment Case # 1509 (11/03) (Conn. App. Ct.) (collateral proceedinging in same indexed in the precding paragraph)
From http://www.paradigmpub.com/docs.asp?case=clergymalpractice