brotherdan said
''The case about a global flood is this:
Jesus believed in it and spoke of it. If I reject the flood, then I reject Jesus. That is why I take an all or nothing approach to the Bible. When you begin to throw out 1 part, you end up having to throw out the whole thing.'' (my bold)
How about this.
Imagine in 2000 years time someone reading a speech of Barak Obama's where he allegedly said
''Just as in the days of Huckleberry Finn people can be racist.''
Or,
''Just as in the days of Oliver Twist some children end up as pickpockets.''
That would not be proof enough for me that Huckleberry Finn or Oliver Twist actually existed as real people. It wouldn't be proof enough for me that Barak Obama believed that they were real people.
I actually used to think very similar to you. I wrote off to the Society asking about the book of Genesis. I wrote that if God had simply left it at Gen 1:1 I would have been happy. He created everything, end of. But no, we have all the nonsense of the first 12 chapters of Genesis to contend with.
I then followed up with your system of thinking. One out, all out.
I'm much happier now not having to try and perform mental contortions to try and get things to fit, eg ice cores, tree rings, glaciers, mountains, ancient human artifacts, totally waterproof pyramids etc.