So I'm guessing from some of the postings that more guns is the better response and certainly not banning more guns.
To take things to the extreme, would it be a better world if everyone was armed to the teeth or if everyone had no guns.
Again to the extreme, when it was just the nuclear USSR v the nuclear West we had an uneasy peace. If it had only been one nation, either the USA or the USSR, having a nuclear arsenal, would it have been a safer world? Probably not.
Will it be a better planet if every nation or political faction were to have their own nuclear arsenal?
I'm not being sarcastic in my posting.
It's genuinely interesting to hear differing views, although it does get a bit tedious with the overly aggressive and belittling defence or otherwise of the opposing views.