Thanks for that, StealyFace,
NLP is a good explanation for his technique. This paragraph about the "yes set" is interesting below:
"Yes Set"
First, let me give you an example of distracting the left brain. Politicians use these powerful techniques all the time; lawyers use many variations which, I've been told, they call "tightening the noose."
Assume for a moment that you are watching a politician give a speech. First, he might generate what is called a "yes set." These are statements that will cause listeners to agree; they might even unknowingly nod their heads in agreement. Next come the truisms. These are usually facts that could be debated but, once the politician has his audience agreeing, the odds are in the politician's favor that the audience won't stop to think for themselves, thus continuing to agree. Last comes the suggestion. This is what the politician wants you to do and, since you have been agreeing all along, you could be persuaded to accept the suggestion. Now, if you'll listen closely to my political speech, you'll find that the first three are the "yes set," the next three are truisms and the last is the suggestion.
I also remember the evil smirk on his face and the shrill-sounding way he said "The children are helping mommy to pioNEER .... YES" . Of course it all went over the pinheads of these people at the hall and nobody else complained about his deception. So here I am: the village idiot. It just irks me how ready they all were to condemn me to eternal destruction after knowing me since I was a child.
True love, anyway, eh?
I didn't have any sort of ill will toward them, as they had assumed, but it all makes me not even want to look at their fake faces ever again now.