Hey guys,
I know I'm putting my neck on the block here, so go ahead and chop away,………
Who are we referring to when we talk about the old being thrown out of Bethel?
That is certainly not the case here at the Australian Bethel. I personally know and have witnessed over many years the care and love given to the older ones who have spent their lives serving in the 'ministry'. I can testify to the patience and care given older ones, - some who have developed dementia in their older years. These older ones have received 24hr a day 'babysitting' and medical care, but beyond that, they have received love and caring and tenderness and respect that normally would only come from a blood relative. These older ones have told me personally that there is no where else they would rather be, (and who am I to judge what they should want or not want - each to their own!) Their greatest sadness is that they are no longer 'useful' and they can no longer do their bethel job or serve out on the circuit or missionary assignments which is what they LOVED to do!
It also seems to me that the WTS is in a 'no win situation' when it comes to the financing of the preaching work and all the necessary organisational structure that comes with that. Doesn't it strike you that they are in the classic situation illustrated in Aesop's fable of 'the Man, the Boy and the Donkey'? No matter what they do they receive criticism from somebody about how they do it. They are 'too greedy' and 'only interested in the money', they don't make 'good use of the money' or they 'should make better financial decisions with the money they have so as not to burden the brothers' or 'they don't look after the ones who work full time' or 'they look after 'their own' too well' etc. etc. etc.
Sure there are many legitimate criticisms that can be made about individual brothers in authoritative positions and legitimate criticisms for mistakes and unfortunate attitudes by the WTS over the years, - but aren't we clutching at straws here?
I feel that we sometimes act like disgruntled teenagers realising for the first time that our adored 'parents' are not perfect after all! In our disappointment at the realities of 'grown-up' life we are now casting about for reasons to blame our 'parent' for all our perceived problems in life without taking responsibility for the decisions we made. Yes - we may have made those decisions based on 'bad advice', but we did make those decisions ourselves, and for every one of us that took a particular course of action, there was another brother or sister making the opposite decision whom 'we looked down on'.
The 'parent' that gave the 'bad advice', was it out of some heinous or ulterior motive to benefit in some way from us 'the children'? Or was it like any parent who gives bad advice from time to time with their children - they did the best they could with what they knew at the time, with the motive of trying to do the right thing!
Isn't there some more constructive purpose we could achieve with this forum?
Edited by - circare on 29 August 2000 2:41:27