Two weeks ago Corney posted the following info that is on-topic here:
From my admittedly limited understanding of the topic, the GB and their Legal Department was not really attempting to enforce the laws or appeal to the government to do so, or even to take these people to court, but to make them start having to pay legal fees, hire lawyers, and so on, in other words put the muscle on them legally, something that, at least on the surface, the WTS can afford since they have free lawyers, whereas those posting in-house secret documents do not. It was an attempt to scare those posting these docs with legal fees in order to get them to stop leaking the org's secret documents, and to pay for having done so.
However, the GB must be more serious now since they are supposed to have retained a pricey legal firm to advise them here: "Watchtower had to hire Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, a top firm in the field of copyright law, one of the six best ones nationwide according to The Legal 500 and one of the seven best ones in NY - according to Chambers." (per Corney's post) That would represent a change on their part, if they are forking over big bucks at a time when funds are tight.
Then another legal team is supposed to have undertaken to represent the Electronic Frontier Foundation, YouTube's legal team, "pro bono, namely Garvey Schubert Barer," after the org hit YouTube with a subpoena (again according to Corney's post).
If anyone is keeping up on these things, an inside report would be appreciated by many here.
And thanks, Atlantis!