1st century: Matthew 8:20 But Jesus said to him: “Foxes have dens and birds of heaven have nests, but the Son of man has nowhere to lay down his head.”
21st century: http://ibsaproperty.com/
behold: ibsaproperty.com“the extensive ibsa property portfolio in north london is now being brought to the market.”ibsa moved to the leafy london suburbs of mill hill in the late 1950’s.
since then, expansion has required the acquisition of further properties in the immediate area, and in some cases further beyond.
in recent years, relocation to a single site which would offer greater economy of operation became more than a matter of interest, and in 2014 a suitable site in chelmsford, essex was purchased.
1st century: Matthew 8:20 But Jesus said to him: “Foxes have dens and birds of heaven have nests, but the Son of man has nowhere to lay down his head.”
21st century: http://ibsaproperty.com/
is there gods true worshipers on earth today as jesus said there would be?
if they are not jws then who are they?.
who else comes close to being gods true followers today?.
To many on this forum have let their faith dwindle
No, they've let logic and reason into their decision making process.
The Bible is NOT the word of God.
All religious books have parts which are undermined by the ever growing knowledge of science.
FB - just keep reading. Once you have taken in enough knowledge and realise there isn't a God, it's incredibly liberating. You have a short time on this blue planet. Go live your life!
and how long will it last?
and who will come after that, yahweh, as the old testament says or jesus, as the new testament says?
the scriptures say he'll come to the mount of olives, but surely that's a spiritual mount of olives.
This war is not fought with literal weapons used in literal war. The symbolism of Revelation and Joel helps define it as fought in the valley of “decision”.
Satan is the Father of the Lie, and from his “mouth” and those under his “woman” covenant (death) with him, lies, dark doctrines and deception are aimed at those in Christ. Rev 12:17,15 The weapons used in Armageddon are truth against lies. Truth originates from the mouth of Christ and faithful messengers who speak it and are under the “woman” covenant of life. Rev 1:15 B, John 4:14; Rev 1:16 B; Rev 19:13,21,15 A; Heb 4:12
Utter nonsense.
Why do people have to substitute one set of sky fairy crap for another set of sky fairy crap?
and how long will it last?
and who will come after that, yahweh, as the old testament says or jesus, as the new testament says?
the scriptures say he'll come to the mount of olives, but surely that's a spiritual mount of olives.
3. Nations of the world turn on religion. ( Again; not happening tomorrow.)
What's interesting about this idea is what happens when you take 'Christendom' off the table and try to imagine this happening with what's left.
Take the next biggest faith - Islam.
Even with the thought that 'God' has put it into the minds of the Nations that make up the UN to attack religions, how exactly do you attack Islam? It isn't structured in the way the churches are. There isn't a Vatican to attack or a General Synod. Structurally it's much flatter. You have the mosques or masjid (which are very simple buildings, not laden with gold for the nations to 'eat up the fleshy parts') and muslims will quickly tell you they don't have to worship in a building called a mosque. Every clean, proper place is masjid for muslims.
So with those thoughts in mind, how do you attack 1.6 billion people?
It's an insane idea when you think about it.
Then you realise that actually what the WT means by attacking religions is attacking 'Christendom'.
This is just their own revenge fantasy for all the ridicule they've suffered from the churches.
Oh dear.
so, he received a letter that i am wondering if it is one of those open letters that are out there to denote time given.
it starts out with the name of the person sending it, then goes into the spiel...do you know our god's name?
when i was shown what it is, i kind of got upset.
First, many claim that the name should not be used because the original way to pronounce it is unknown today. Ancient Hebrew was written without vowels. Therefore, no one today can say for sure exactly how people of Bible times pronounced YHWH. However, should this prevent us from using God’s name? In Bible times, the name Jesus may have been pronounced Yeshua or possibly Yehoshua—no one can say for certain. Yet, people the world over today use different forms of the name Jesus, pronouncing it in the way that is common in their language. They do not hesitate to use the name just because they do not know its first-century pronunciation. Similarly, if you were to travel to a foreign land, you might well find that your own name sounds quite different in another tongue. Hence, uncertainty about the ancient pronunciation of God’s name is no reason for not using it.
The problem here is twofold. The correct name to call God and its use in the Christian Greek Scriptures (or NT).
With regards the first point, the correct name to call God, if it doesn't matter what name to call God then surely God isn't fussed about the name that he is called?
Which means LORD is perfectly acceptable.
The WT argument seems to be that LORD doesn't sound very personal. But no one knows how to pronounce YWHW because God hasn't told anyone. So surely that means God isn't fussed about the name that he is called? This argument gets very circular!
The real problem is the Christian Greek Scriptures (or NT). YHWH never occurs in it. There is an excellent book by Professor Jason BeDuhn called 'Truth in Translation: Accuracy and Bias in English Translations of the New Testament'. In it he's clearly a big fan of the Watchtower's translation of the Bible. But...he devotes the entire appendix to destroying the WT's addition of Jehovah to the Christian Greek Scriptures. Which is what the vast majority of Bible scholars state. It's a fiction. They have changed the Bible to add this.
So YHWH only occurs in the Hebrew scriptures and no one actually knows how to pronounce it - so there is no reason not to use LORD.
YHWH never occurs in the the Christian Greek Scriptures - it's an addition by the WT in their translation.
so, he received a letter that i am wondering if it is one of those open letters that are out there to denote time given.
it starts out with the name of the person sending it, then goes into the spiel...do you know our god's name?
when i was shown what it is, i kind of got upset.
Point out that Jehovah is not God's name.
No one knows how to pronounce YHWH. For some reason God forgot to tell everyone how to say it. Jehovah is name made up by a Catholic monk. Read more here: Is God's Name Jehovah?
It's important to remember this. No one knows how to say God's name. No one.
this should be titled "jerks for jesus afraid of their own shadow, sexuality".
seriously, someone thinks that a video on how to be nice to people different from him is an affront to his god.
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/09/federal-worker-would-rather-be-fired-than-watch-lgbt-diversity-video-god-doesnt-want-me-to-see-it/.
This will come up more and more.
It's important their bigotry is challenged, all the way to court.
one hundred years have passed and the society still supports this lie, which of course, is the basis of their other lies, like that of the unfaithful and not discreet slave appointed in 1919. however, i wonder, what will happen after 50 years, when the overlapped generation will pass?.
and if you want, what will happen with this religion in 2100?, could it survive with the same lie??
?.
I think that the whole point of the One Generation = Two Overlapping Groups was to buy time.
They didn't seem to need that doctrine but they still invented it.
So what's the expiry date?
I would suggest the 2030s. By that point Mark Sanderson will be in his 70s. He's been used as an example of the second group that overlaps with the first.
It wouldn't be a surprise to me if they're not already re-examining scriptures with the view to create a whole new end times dating system.
The WT needs the end to be 'close' to 'create' urgency. As 1914 fades into the distance it will be harder and harder to maintain that urgency.
in recent years significant progress has been made in solving the question of how life originated on our planet.. how do you think theists will respond when it finally happens?
as a former christian i know my reaction would have been something like "well that just goes to show that it takes intelligent life to make life", but for two reasons that defense doesn't work.. firstly it would prove that life is not an ethereal force that originates with god.
there is no 'ghost in the machine', no elan vital.
Good thread.
Mars may have life on it. Bacterial life. Images from a satellite above Mars excited people when they showed dark moving patches. If there is liquid on Mars, and it contains bacterial life, how will the Theists explain it away?
I've realised that there's a hard core group of Theists that will always reject evidence. If intelligent space aliens appeared tomorrow and humanity said 'So was it God or evolution?' and the space aliens said 'evolution' then a huge section of humanity would reject them. They're wrong - they don't know for sure. They're demons (which I'm sure would be the JW.org response).
Sad really.
for practical reasons (a study next week).
i'm looking for wts quotes that claim.
the religion of jehovah's witnesses is the only true religion.
Straight for the mouth of God: