in 1897, j.j. thomson discovered the electron.
this was the first constituent part of the atom which, for 2,000 years, was thought to be indivisible.
today, we know of 18 elemental particles following the recent discovery of the higgs boson, the so-called god particle.. back in 1897, most people believed in god because there weren't even any theories as to how the universe came into being.
The evidence of our common ancestry is beyond all sensible dispute. Cofty
Once again misquoting people. Isn’t it strange that ex-witnesses act upon misquotes or misrepresentation as an evil act and do everything to contact the author to alert them, yet it’s okay here, a shallow assumption to think as many atheist believe of a perfect solution with that coined phrase “all sensible dispute” spoken like a true book author. I’ll wait to see what your alter ego Viviane will say.
in 1897, j.j. thomson discovered the electron.
this was the first constituent part of the atom which, for 2,000 years, was thought to be indivisible.
today, we know of 18 elemental particles following the recent discovery of the higgs boson, the so-called god particle.. back in 1897, most people believed in god because there weren't even any theories as to how the universe came into being.
The evidence of our common ancestry is beyond all sensible dispute- Cofty
What kind of an idiot designs DNA in such a way that it is possible to mutate in such a way that cancer results?
You telling me that someone creates something as complex as the human mind in such a way that it is prone to getting Alzheimer's later in life?
Oh, and when you talk to your invisible friend, do thank him for creating AIDS and Ebola.
Ask Cotfy, it’s his and your evolutionary theories that
you mentioned came by natural selection and evolved even though he has been unable to
explain with his converted atheism how Cloning could be part of natural
selection if it is man made. The same question I posed to several evolutionists
like, Margulis, Venter etc. I was however kicked out of a conference with Tyson
by calling it a delusional concept but was unable to elaborate even through follow-up
questions were asked in my absence and was unable to answer such a simple
question. So don't twist the theory around just because it didn't align with your ideology.
in 1897, j.j. thomson discovered the electron.
this was the first constituent part of the atom which, for 2,000 years, was thought to be indivisible.
today, we know of 18 elemental particles following the recent discovery of the higgs boson, the so-called god particle.. back in 1897, most people believed in god because there weren't even any theories as to how the universe came into being.
Doltologist: Please go away and read about M-theory
Yes, well this is what I mean about junior achievers. If I pointed out microevolution or macroevolution, then you will have people here that are part of your evolutionary circle refute that claim by stating that there are no constructs to evolution just evolution. So if people within your circles create controversy, then how can you then explain intelligent design? LUCA wouldn’t work, that would mean having the same traits and flaws.
Ape to man, none of the DNA coincides. The term similar is then misleading. As I have stated before, there is then a supreme being at work, whether you frame it as God or a highly intellectual micro biologist. You stipulate the adverb “YET”, this adverb works both ways. Now what will man do if the question were reversed. So without reverting to only insults, explain how science has found the origin of life.
in 1897, j.j. thomson discovered the electron.
this was the first constituent part of the atom which, for 2,000 years, was thought to be indivisible.
today, we know of 18 elemental particles following the recent discovery of the higgs boson, the so-called god particle.. back in 1897, most people believed in god because there weren't even any theories as to how the universe came into being.
Abiogenesis
The original evolution of life or living organisms from inorganic or inanimate substances: to construct any convincing theory of abiogenesis, we must take into account the condition of the Earth about 4 billion years ago
The construct of evolution.
Even though science has made extraordinary advances, it still has not found the origin of life. Since science mandates in order for a hypothesis to become a theory, science needs to duplicate the scenario.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis
While junior evolutionists here seem to infer without adequate knowledge, this theory has been in the forefront since the 30’s. Book writers here can only defend what they have written without fully understanding the concept of complete evolution.
While some scientist have glorified new breakthroughs such as artificial life, they failed to include from this marvel of science that all that transpired was a modification of existing bacterial cells from the depth of the marina trench.
Genetic manipulation has been around since the 80’s. None of these concepts has duplicated the origins of life, and never will with prominent scientist asserting a higher being as a source.
So the quest for a man made theory through existence from nothing would be equally preposterous.
i don't know if i have shared this with everyone, but there seems to be a new theocratic term, at least in my circuit.. the term is "final push.
" wtf does it mean?
well, an eldub said that the gb are "all in" with warwick and they might spend all their money on the project.
J.A.The final push in 'Our world" of apostates.
My hat off to you sir, Even though you seem to be an ex-witness elder, you still understand the meaning. Perhaps you can educate people here to be more pointed with their heretical views in the sense it’s not unique to Jehovah’s Witnesses.
shit!
it finally happened.. years ago i speculated on this happening but can't find the posts.
anyway, this is a tactically aggressive move by wt.
The key word is "deliberately." How do you prove that someone deliberately spread a false teaching??
For further information, contact: DD
i don't know if i have shared this with everyone, but there seems to be a new theocratic term, at least in my circuit.. the term is "final push.
" wtf does it mean?
well, an eldub said that the gb are "all in" with warwick and they might spend all their money on the project.
Oh! Horatio what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=46ctpddnaom
While I have sympathy for the Df’d person, it is clear that her recorded conversation is misrepresented by the narrator. The most that did happened was the lack of communication both parties had. Clarity is vital to understanding. Where the narrator erred was in the perception that the Df’d person still had in wanting to return which was clearly not the case. It is clear her intention of not returning was made with her last correspondence. Unfortunately the recorded conversation was made to confirm her disdain and unwillingness to return by her emotional state which lead others simply to conclude of her insincerity as a whole outcome to return. Showing her love for people was a symbolic gesture in her behalf nothing more while venting that she made clear it was inconsequential at that point. Miscommunication was obviously rampant here, as that’s a shame.
hey everyone, this is my first post.
i was contacted by the witnesses in1965, baptized in that same year at age 15. i was appointed an elder in 1975 and served as an elder for 20 years..
it hasnt been long since i learn ttatt and when i totally woke up.
Now that you have 32 posts how does it feel? The core argument you just referenced was learning this hypothetical TTATT. It always amazes me how people can write this stuff with a strait mind. It reminds me of Cyrano de Bergerac instead of George Washington.
Have you started to build your alter egos as others do here? Multiple accounts will empower you to fit right in; you know give the illusion of millions when in reality, its only thousands of ex-witnesses that by the most part were kicked out of this religion and have their active witness sympathizing friends think by cloaking themselves from man holds them in some special category of God’s acceptance (insiders). That’s a very good illusion. Give your own Q&A the more fake responses the sooner lurkers will learn your TTATT theory and be enchanted by the Siren’s song. Luke 11:14-15
Be in harmony with 1 John 2:15-16 and Context: Message to the Church in Laodicea (NIV) Revelation 3:14-22
Keep up the good work.
sometime during or after my conversion to jehovah witnesses 55 years ago , i felt it was my calling , duty , mission , to preach the word , and witness to as many people as i could about the watchtower`s interpretation of the bible that i believed was the truth.. and may i presume i am not alone there .i feel many if not all would have had similar thoughts.. without being presumptuous i think i have found my real calling in life , in doing what little i can to add my 2 cents worth in exposing this religion for what a fraud it actually is ,especially to the newbies , because most of us here have already found ttatt .. so witnessing to the truth about jehovah`s witnesses on this board , gives me much more pleasure than i ever had witnessing for the watchtower organization.
and this site / board has enabled me to do that , thank you simon ,ang, and company.. smiddy.
