The key word is "deliberately." How do you prove that someone deliberately spread a false teaching??
For further information, contact: DD
shit!
it finally happened.. years ago i speculated on this happening but can't find the posts.
anyway, this is a tactically aggressive move by wt.
The key word is "deliberately." How do you prove that someone deliberately spread a false teaching??
For further information, contact: DD
i don't know if i have shared this with everyone, but there seems to be a new theocratic term, at least in my circuit.. the term is "final push.
" wtf does it mean?
well, an eldub said that the gb are "all in" with warwick and they might spend all their money on the project.
Oh! Horatio what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=46ctpddnaom
While I have sympathy for the Df’d person, it is clear that her recorded conversation is misrepresented by the narrator. The most that did happened was the lack of communication both parties had. Clarity is vital to understanding. Where the narrator erred was in the perception that the Df’d person still had in wanting to return which was clearly not the case. It is clear her intention of not returning was made with her last correspondence. Unfortunately the recorded conversation was made to confirm her disdain and unwillingness to return by her emotional state which lead others simply to conclude of her insincerity as a whole outcome to return. Showing her love for people was a symbolic gesture in her behalf nothing more while venting that she made clear it was inconsequential at that point. Miscommunication was obviously rampant here, as that’s a shame.
hey everyone, this is my first post.
i was contacted by the witnesses in1965, baptized in that same year at age 15. i was appointed an elder in 1975 and served as an elder for 20 years..
it hasnt been long since i learn ttatt and when i totally woke up.
Now that you have 32 posts how does it feel? The core argument you just referenced was learning this hypothetical TTATT. It always amazes me how people can write this stuff with a strait mind. It reminds me of Cyrano de Bergerac instead of George Washington.
Have you started to build your alter egos as others do here? Multiple accounts will empower you to fit right in; you know give the illusion of millions when in reality, its only thousands of ex-witnesses that by the most part were kicked out of this religion and have their active witness sympathizing friends think by cloaking themselves from man holds them in some special category of God’s acceptance (insiders). That’s a very good illusion. Give your own Q&A the more fake responses the sooner lurkers will learn your TTATT theory and be enchanted by the Siren’s song. Luke 11:14-15
Be in harmony with 1 John 2:15-16 and Context: Message to the Church in Laodicea (NIV) Revelation 3:14-22
Keep up the good work.
sometime during or after my conversion to jehovah witnesses 55 years ago , i felt it was my calling , duty , mission , to preach the word , and witness to as many people as i could about the watchtower`s interpretation of the bible that i believed was the truth.. and may i presume i am not alone there .i feel many if not all would have had similar thoughts.. without being presumptuous i think i have found my real calling in life , in doing what little i can to add my 2 cents worth in exposing this religion for what a fraud it actually is ,especially to the newbies , because most of us here have already found ttatt .. so witnessing to the truth about jehovah`s witnesses on this board , gives me much more pleasure than i ever had witnessing for the watchtower organization.
and this site / board has enabled me to do that , thank you simon ,ang, and company.. smiddy.
august 2015 awake .
quote in title taken from article footnote.. anyone have information on who gene hwang and yan-der hsuuw in the article are?.
why do they repeatedly state that apes turned to humans when that's not what evolutionists teach at all?.
The human theory of Evolution. I often ask myself. Do inexperienced idealists really understand the true structure of Evolution? My answer would be NO. The facts that inexperienced evolutionist find a need to attack and belittle people that prove their lack of knowledge, becomes a paramount response of only focusing in one set standard without having to rely on other theories within the structure as a whole that make their contradictory responses mundane.
Philosophy is then needed to understand all facets of evolution.
Definitions of Evolutionary Terms
Adaptation:
The adjustment or changes in behavior, physiology, and structure of an organism
to become more suited to an environment. According to Charles Darwin's theory
of evolution by natural selection, organisms that possess heritable traits that
enable them to better adapt to their environment compared with other members of
their species will be more likely to survive, reproduce, and pass more of their
genes on to the next generation.
Chromosome:
A double stranded DNA molecule that contains a series of specific genes along
its length. In most sexually reproducing organisms, chromosomes occur in pairs,
with one member of the pair being inherited from each parent.
DNA:
Deoxyribonucleic acid. A large biological molecule composed of subunits known
as nucleotides strung together in long chains. The sequences of these
nucleotides contain the information that cells need in order to grow, to divide
into daughter cells, and to manufacture new proteins. Changes in DNA result in
mutations, which may be beneficial, neutral, or deleterious to the organism. If
these changes occur to DNA in sperm or egg cells, they could be passed onto the
next generation.
Evolution:
Evolution consists of changes in the heritable traits of a population of
organisms as successive generations replace one another. It is populations of
organisms that evolve, not individual organisms.
Fact:
In science, a "fact" typically refers to an observation, measurement,
or other form of evidence that can be expected to occur the same way under
similar circumstances. However, scientists also use the term "fact"
to refer to a scientific explanation that has been tested and confirmed so many
times that there is no longer a compelling reason to keep testing it or looking
for additional examples.
Fossil:
A remnant or trace of an organism of a past geologic age, such as a skeleton or
leaf imprint, embedded, and preserved in the Earth's crust, usually in
stratified rock.
Hypothesis:
A tentative explanation for an observation, phenomenon, or scientific problem
that can be tested by further investigation. Scientific hypotheses must be
posed in a form that allows them to be rejected.
Genomics:
A recent branch of genetics that studies organisms in terms of their complete
genetic material, including genes and their functions.
Macroevolution:
Large-scale evolution occurring over geologic time that results in the
formation of new species and broader taxonomic groups.
Microevolution:
Changes in the traits of a group of organisms within a species that do not
result in a new species.
Mimicry:
In biology, mimicry is the superficial resemblance of one species of organism
to another species or to a natural object in its surroundings. Some kinds of
mimicry result in a selective advantage for concealment and protection from
predators. Another type of mimicry enables protection to the mimic through its
resemblance to another species that is toxic or in some other way dangerous.
Mutation:
A change in the sequence of one or more nucleotides in DNA. Such changes can
alter the structure of proteins or the regulation of protein production. In
some cases mutations result in the organism possessing these altered traits to
have a greater or lesser chance of surviving and reproducing in a given
environment than other members of its species.
Natural selection:
Differential survival and reproduction of organisms as a consequence of the
characteristics of the environment.
Paleontologist:
A scientist who studies fossils to learn about ancient organisms.
Protein:
A large molecule consisting of a chain of smaller molecules called amino acids.
The sequence of amino acids and the molecule's three-dimensional structure are
coded by the instructions in DNA and determine a protein's specific function in
cells or organisms.
Population:
A group of organisms of the same species that are in close enough proximity to
allow them to interbreed.
RNA:
Ribonucleic acid. A molecule related to DNA that consists of nucleotide
subunits strung together in chains. RNA serves a number of cellular functions,
including providing a template for the synthesis of proteins and catalyzing
certain biochemical reactions. The structure of RNA is determined by the
sequence of nucleotides on DNA.
Science:
The use of evidence to construct testable explanations and predictions of
natural phenomena, as well as the knowledge generated through this process.
Sedimentary:
Rocks formed of particles deposited by water, wind, or ice.
Selective breeding:
The intentional breeding of organisms with desirable traits in an attempt to
produce offspring with enhanced characteristics or traits that humans consider
desirable. This process is also known as "artifical selection"
(compare with "natural selection").
Speciation:
The evolutionary processes through which new species arise from existing
species.
Species:
In sexually reproducing organisms, species consist of individuals that can
interbreed with each other.
Survival of the fittest:
A term that refers to the survival of only those organisms best able (fittest)
to obtain and utilize resources, resulting in the evolution of organisms that
are best adapted to the environment. Darwin used metaphorically to describe
"natural selection." The phrase was invented by the 19th century
philosopher Herbert Spencer It has been misapplied through history to explain
and justify social and economic inequities in human populations ("social
Darwinism") or as a method for improving the human condition through
selective breeding (eugenics). Survival alone is insufficient for evolution -
it's reproduction - passing on of genes that really counts. Most modern
biologists no longer use this term when describing or discussing natural
selection.
Theory:
A plausible or scientifically acceptable, well-substantiated explanation of
some aspect of the natural world; an organized system of accepted knowledge
that applies in a variety of circumstances to explain a specific set of
phenomena and predict the characteristics of as yet unobserved phenomena.
Trait:
A physical or behavioral characteristic of an organism.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Scientific+theory+of+evolution
http://www.livescience.com/474-controversy-evolution-works.html
august 2015 awake .
quote in title taken from article footnote.. anyone have information on who gene hwang and yan-der hsuuw in the article are?.
why do they repeatedly state that apes turned to humans when that's not what evolutionists teach at all?.
august 2015 awake .
quote in title taken from article footnote.. anyone have information on who gene hwang and yan-der hsuuw in the article are?.
why do they repeatedly state that apes turned to humans when that's not what evolutionists teach at all?.
DD Regardless of the origin of life, let me repeat, regardless of the ORIGIN OF LIFE, animals evolve. To say anything less is dishonest and ignorant. For "Christ's brothers" to deliberately misquote authors or take quotes out of context in order to make "evolution" a dirty word is the height of dishonesty.
marmot: SimonSays, your skin is thinner than a salamander's, DataDog never called you ignorant.
...although if the shoe fits.
Yes I’m aware of DD metaphor. Perhaps you will need a shoe horn and a mirror to give you the ability to see the reflection correctly while sizing up that shoe. Whereas the assertion of Christian brothers only applies to people that have not become complacent in their beliefs which reflects worlds apart from true understanding by which I associate with.
august 2015 awake .
quote in title taken from article footnote.. anyone have information on who gene hwang and yan-der hsuuw in the article are?.
why do they repeatedly state that apes turned to humans when that's not what evolutionists teach at all?.
DD> No, it's not hypothetical. I suggest you do some research on the Coywolf, an animal that you can observe right now.
I would suggest before you open you big mouth and call people ignorant you read the threads correctly as no one is suggesting that premise.
august 2015 awake .
quote in title taken from article footnote.. anyone have information on who gene hwang and yan-der hsuuw in the article are?.
why do they repeatedly state that apes turned to humans when that's not what evolutionists teach at all?.
While your definition of evolution has many variables, the distinctions
therefore continue as hypothetical, even if certain aspects have proven
theories.