By the time Russell met him, Barbour was no longer an
Adventist. (Russell says this.) He had moved into Age-to-Come theology. This is
British Literalism. He adopted Mark Allan’s doctrine and told a newspaper reporter
that his congregation in Rochester was affiliated with Allan’s Church of the
Blessed Hope.
Exactly, you have just confirmed what ignorant people having
been disputing for over 15 years here.
Giving history lessons is my profession. You’ve just had
one. I should add that you criticize Penton and Schulz and de Vienne for
selling books. Original research is expensive and time consuming. The Bible
principal is “to the worker belong his wages.” I’ve written a few textbooks
over the years some still in use. (I’m nearly 90) And I can tell you that
return on work is often small. If you don’t want to pay for a book, don’t buy
it. But it is not a sin to buy and sell, even intellectual work.
I sorry to read this, a historian. Wow! The research on the
account of Barbour is not entirely ORIGINAL since he wrote many pamphlets and
information in other books. So to suggest that research is expensive for
reading books, Come On! Not even you buy in to that, unless you’re suggesting
these people spoke to Barbour. Aside from that, Barbour was a lost Prophet but
to the Advent Movement NOT the Bible Students as suggested once again from
questionable sources.
Your entire argument rests on misstated ‘facts’ and
misleading statements. You’re spelling, grammar and thought are confused. You
want to elevate Russell at Barbour’s expense. You’ve chosen the wrong tack.
Barbour was vain, self-entitled and a thief. The difference between them when
they separated was personal behavior with a mix of doctrinal difference.
I’m glad you corrected yourself. I wouldn’t be able to find
a different aspect to low life. Find a different way of giving history lessons
for WTS stuff, you’re just embarrassing yourself. Don’t worry you have
impressed people here from all the time you have invested here. Is it worth
money by deception, Hm!!!!!!!!
There are about 7-8 books that would refute the claim you
and your friend suggest. However to believe that person was being harassed by the WTS
obviously doesn’t know the meaning of the word. You will never impress me as a
historian although it would have been nice since you seem to be more open
minded than others, but if you’re going to promote someone, know the REAL TRUE.
My responses are not researched like yours, I don’t have time to use proper grammar,
sorry.