Baba, if you'll read the thread from the begining, you'll see that any amount of healthy skepticism about the afterlife is not tolerated by a few individuals. Certainly not everyone, but just a few. For example, I asked Judge Dread if it was unreasonable for me to not accept personal testimony as evidence that ghosts exist. He has sidestepped answering and instead offered false logic as his rebuttal.
This isn't about the existence of ghosts, demons, the afterlife, or anything like that. It's about being able to maintain a civil discussion based on reason and logic.
In the end, I will say this: While I find stories of ghosts and the supernatural mildly entertaining, I cannot not take them seriously. At least not beyond a certain point of cursory review. Every tall tale I have ever heard personally was told by a person who's judgment and emotional state I questioned, not because they had a supernatural experience, but because of who they were. Most often, they had a desire to feel special, and that they had a special connection with the world around them that others didn't have. This is a fantastical, fairy-tale mentality. Also, the existence of the supernatural would be contrary to virtually every known law of the universe. That's a hefty amount of laws to suspend belief in when considering an afterlife reality. I know that my beliefs and opinions are not going to dissuade those who believe in their own supernatural experience. I'm not sure I'd want to dissuade them in the first place, because I think those who believe in the supernatural, need to believe in the supernatural. Afterall, the most common form of this is with people believing there is a God in the sky that loves them and looks out for them. A lot of people obviously need to believe in that. Someday I may need to believe in it, as well.