annOmaly,
understood. thanks for the clarification.
j2s
http://ewatchman-exposed.co.uk/research/read.php?t=2303&reply=27#msg27 .
if this link works, i bet it don't last long.
anyone else for some fun?
annOmaly,
understood. thanks for the clarification.
j2s
http://ewatchman-exposed.co.uk/research/read.php?t=2303&reply=27#msg27 .
if this link works, i bet it don't last long.
anyone else for some fun?
annomaly,
"check her post history" why? the problem with that is #1 she wasn't posting on this forum. how would those on the other forum "check her post history"? and #2 if someone did "check her post history" they would find out that she is not a teenager as she tried to give the impression, nor is she a "young adult" as she claimed when asked a direct question about her age. and #3 finally that the reason the statute of limitations had run out was because her abuse occured more than 25 years ago which of course would cast doubt on her age. the problem with telling a lie (i am a teenager) to support a legitimate complaint (i was molested) are the lies you have to tell (i am a young adult) in order to support the first lie. i truly don't believe that cbd wanted anyone on that other forum to "check her post history"
j2s
so im eating dinner with my hubby and kids at a local family restaurant, when in walks some people with name tags of some sort, i cant read them, im sitting to far away, but they have the look of the convention name tags.
well i guess i can spot a jw right off, because sure enough as i got closer, there it was a flash back from the past.
the same ol name tags.
blumandy,
welcome to jwd. here is a positive thought for you...even though the situation caused a flashback of the jws, you could have been looking at someone who may be your friend here on this forum.
j2s
http://ewatchman-exposed.co.uk/research/read.php?t=2303&reply=27#msg27 .
if this link works, i bet it don't last long.
anyone else for some fun?
rebel8,
reread the origional post at the top of this thread. does this sound like someone trying to help, someone trying to inform, or does it sound like a troll who somehow has forgotten that when you say something on the internet you say it to everyone? and when she got caught(duh) she just couldn't chalk it up to an illconcieved idea and move on. as far as lies are concerned, i hate to tell you ladies this but 42 years old is not a "young adult".{"auralei how old are you?" "...yes, i'm a young adult now"}. even after she was knocked off on the statute of limitations she continued to troll by playing the "are you calling me an apostate" card. i don't like trolls. i don't like them here, there, or anywhere. it is a waste of time and only gives more ammunition to those who are looking for all the ammunition they can get.
and yes al i called you all idiots because the e-watchman/anti-e-watchman world is rife with idiots who believe they are princes and judges. just like in the wtb&ts, just like on jwd, and just like the rest of the world.
j2s of the at least i'm still having fun class
http://ewatchman-exposed.co.uk/research/read.php?t=2303&reply=27#msg27 .
if this link works, i bet it don't last long.
anyone else for some fun?
cbd,
did you really accomplish what you thought you would with your post? all i can say is that your little trick let a bunch of absolute idiots make you look like a fool. a lieing fool at that. are we still having fun?
when you post on someone's topic, do you expect an acknowledgement from the person who started it?
if you don't get an acknowledgment, would you stop posting on any other other topics by the person?
i personally don't expect an acknowledgement from anyone.
the problem i have with the ettiquite on jwd is that when you ask a question or questions, and the person answers, but they don't answer the questions. instead they answer with threats and hyperbole. if you don't have an answer to my questions that is fine, but don't show your ignorance by threatening me as an answer to a legitimate question. that really is too much like the organization's way of dealing with things. there seems to be two classes of people here; those who are held to proper ettiquite and those to whom ettiquite means nothing and wouldn't know proper if it bit their ass.
i never expect answers and i seldom get them.
j2s
when i came into the org.
in the early 1980's, we had a good body of elders.
they took the lead and cared for the sheep.. the oldest was in his mid- 70's, had a sharp mind, great sense of humor and was just plain cool.
nope. nothing but assholes and asswipes.
i don't have the text of the decision; this sumary is via the blog religion clause:.
police can help church eject trespassing worshipper.
in ferreira v. harris, 2006 u.s. dist.
not enough information here. was he being passive or aggressive? if you make an ass of yourself, you will be asked to leave no matter where you are. and if you refuse to leave the police may be called, because once you are asked to leave and refuse you are trespassing. i learned this from a number of unfortunate incidents during my old drinking days.
as i was reading one of the 'newbies' threads, at the end google has this ad for a site we've seen discussed here before.
yet, i never really went and read the site {i do tons of reading, so it isn't easy to read everything i'd like}.. for others interested:.
http://www.energeticsolutions.com.au/great_watchtower_deception.html.
all right everyone who has observed a meeting at which the study conducter reads the paragraphs and the reader answers with scripture please tell me where you saw this. this has never been my experience, which has been in one state in one country but in a number of congregations.
purplesofa, in the two local congregations the reader has always been to the left. or is this a stage left--stage right thing?
using only my experience and hearing this person's description i have to say that i find it hard to believe this person has ever been in a kh, much less observed a wt study. if your experince is as he has described i really would like to know where and when.
j2s of the just because it's for sale on the internet doesn't mean i'm buying it class
when i first started studying with the jehovah witnesses, although i am a technical, matter of fact type of guy, the thing that got my attention was the genuine love i saw in the congregation (this was in the early 80's).
it made such a impression on me that i ignored some of the serious questions i had about the organization and went ahead and got baptized (i figured things would get sorted out over time and decided to give the society the benefit of the doubt) .
the congregation i went to was a fireball, full of activity and good works and growing fast.
as the old saying goes, a fish rots from the head down. this fish has been rotting since rutherford seized power in 1916. any love between individuals is soon eliminated.