Dr. Jeckyll and Mr. Hyde?
skeeter1
JoinedPosts by skeeter1
-
102
Bill Cosby - too much smoke for no fire?
by Simon init seems like the list of people who are accusing him of rape and sexual assault is growing every day.
i'm skeptical of single accusations but the number of people and the similar stories seem overwhelming now.. it's not a conviction but to the court of public opinion ... guilty?.
.
-
-
-
254
Michael Brown verdict discussion policy
by Simon init's likely that the grand jury verdict on the michael brown incident will be released in the coming days or weeks.. i've no doubt many people are going to feel strongly about things whatever the verdict is.. whatever the outcome though, here's what's not going to happen:.
we're not going to put up with inflamatory language and comments designed to rile others up.
be respectful.. we will not allow accusations of racism simply because some have a view of the verdict that contradicts others.. there will not be invented evidence or claims being repeated - if it's been falsely reported or debunked then it's off limits.. it's not going to be an opportunity for people to air past gripes over past discussions.. if you feel that you cannot discuss the subject in a rational way then it may be better to simply avoid any topics on the matter.. please try to be objective and respectful if you do decide to comment and not keen to take offense.
-
-
skeeter1
Until newspapers and society can choose to look at the full facts and not cherry pick, they are choosing to live a delusional life. Delusion cannot solve problems.
-
6
Great news!!!
by truthseekeriam ini recently found out that my family's horriable experience helped one mother decide to never go back!!
in turn, her 2 teenage children have been living normal lives.
i can't tell you how happy i am for them..
-
-
skeeter1
Yeah! Perhaps you can get together with them during the Holidays, even if it's just meeting for lunch.
-
16
Attracting young ones to the org
by Gratefullyunstuck innoticing a lot of posts and behaviours of the org that they seem to be trying to appeal to the younger generation.
im wondering if they are jumping on the back of a popular young clothing brand called jack wills.. a lot of their clothes have jw logo on them.
i wonder when searching this logo 'jw' on internet, where the search takes them?....................hmmmmmm!.
-
-
skeeter1
Prince could give a concert?
-
254
Michael Brown verdict discussion policy
by Simon init's likely that the grand jury verdict on the michael brown incident will be released in the coming days or weeks.. i've no doubt many people are going to feel strongly about things whatever the verdict is.. whatever the outcome though, here's what's not going to happen:.
we're not going to put up with inflamatory language and comments designed to rile others up.
be respectful.. we will not allow accusations of racism simply because some have a view of the verdict that contradicts others.. there will not be invented evidence or claims being repeated - if it's been falsely reported or debunked then it's off limits.. it's not going to be an opportunity for people to air past gripes over past discussions.. if you feel that you cannot discuss the subject in a rational way then it may be better to simply avoid any topics on the matter.. please try to be objective and respectful if you do decide to comment and not keen to take offense.
-
-
skeeter1
It's clear that Mr. Brown was not a hero or a martyr, that the community & black leaders rushed to put him on a pedastal.
Honestly, it reminds me of the JW leadership. They find a story, make it into what they want the story to be by embellishing it, and having someone put their version out as an actual story at an assembly to garner guilt.
I am not saying that police brutality and racism/profiling does not happen. It surely does happen. But, you can't pin your hopes on the parties in a single case until you know more facts. You can't condemn a police officer and martyr a man, prematurely. Because, isn't that racism in reverse?
-
254
Michael Brown verdict discussion policy
by Simon init's likely that the grand jury verdict on the michael brown incident will be released in the coming days or weeks.. i've no doubt many people are going to feel strongly about things whatever the verdict is.. whatever the outcome though, here's what's not going to happen:.
we're not going to put up with inflamatory language and comments designed to rile others up.
be respectful.. we will not allow accusations of racism simply because some have a view of the verdict that contradicts others.. there will not be invented evidence or claims being repeated - if it's been falsely reported or debunked then it's off limits.. it's not going to be an opportunity for people to air past gripes over past discussions.. if you feel that you cannot discuss the subject in a rational way then it may be better to simply avoid any topics on the matter.. please try to be objective and respectful if you do decide to comment and not keen to take offense.
-
-
skeeter1
http://governor.mo.gov/news/executive-orders/executive-order-14-14
Governor of Missouri put up an executive order to oversee/contain the rioting that must be expected to occur. Like the GB, he has an opportunity to really say the right things to lead. Perhaps now is not the time, but when this all calms down I doubt that the obvious will be done.
(Thankfully, I'm on a conference call right now).
-
254
Michael Brown verdict discussion policy
by Simon init's likely that the grand jury verdict on the michael brown incident will be released in the coming days or weeks.. i've no doubt many people are going to feel strongly about things whatever the verdict is.. whatever the outcome though, here's what's not going to happen:.
we're not going to put up with inflamatory language and comments designed to rile others up.
be respectful.. we will not allow accusations of racism simply because some have a view of the verdict that contradicts others.. there will not be invented evidence or claims being repeated - if it's been falsely reported or debunked then it's off limits.. it's not going to be an opportunity for people to air past gripes over past discussions.. if you feel that you cannot discuss the subject in a rational way then it may be better to simply avoid any topics on the matter.. please try to be objective and respectful if you do decide to comment and not keen to take offense.
-
-
skeeter1
Simon,
My point isn't party politics, it's that the parties are mere puppets. Chasing ambulances would be a reference to trial attorneys, who also are a large segment of lobbyists. But, the money in being a Congressman is from courting lobbyists who put on fundraising dinners, pay for Congressional (& family travel), etc. Congressmen court big money lobbyists to throw the most lavish fundraising dinners, to get big donations to their campaign. When I worked at a law firm, select people running for reelection to judge postitions were brought around to every office and cubicle within the firm by the managing partner. It was known to all to have your checkbook ready. The firm didn't give money directly to the judges, each & every lawyer, secretary, and janitor gave money to his campaign for reelection! Nothing is going to change, becuase our leaders are tied into this system that is mastered by someone else's purse strings. A few days rioting, getting black people to vote Republican or Democrat, white people to vote Republican or Democrat . . . doesn't matter much at all. The Golden Rule applies: "He who has the gold, makes the rules."
You are absolutely correct on fatherlessness. That's what I was driving at in #3. A book is the "Broken Hearth", written a few decades ago. The economists were already seeing the devastating effects of fatherlessness on society. The numbers were staggering at the amount of black dads in jail and/or who completely left the family unit. This reality led to the Million Man March. Now, the figures are increasing in whites too.
You are absolutely right on a positive "can do" attitude. I feel like half of America wants to slack off these days. Speaking of which, I better get to work myself.
Skeeter
-
254
Michael Brown verdict discussion policy
by Simon init's likely that the grand jury verdict on the michael brown incident will be released in the coming days or weeks.. i've no doubt many people are going to feel strongly about things whatever the verdict is.. whatever the outcome though, here's what's not going to happen:.
we're not going to put up with inflamatory language and comments designed to rile others up.
be respectful.. we will not allow accusations of racism simply because some have a view of the verdict that contradicts others.. there will not be invented evidence or claims being repeated - if it's been falsely reported or debunked then it's off limits.. it's not going to be an opportunity for people to air past gripes over past discussions.. if you feel that you cannot discuss the subject in a rational way then it may be better to simply avoid any topics on the matter.. please try to be objective and respectful if you do decide to comment and not keen to take offense.
-
-
skeeter1
Desirous,
The 2 party system is a hoax. It's two sides of the same coin. They pretend to be a little different, but they are not. They don't rule our government, nor does any single politician you vote for. The Lobbyists rule our government. Lobbyists put massive influence on all three braches of government, with which laws to pass, who to appoint in government positions, and the reelection of state judiciary. Why do you think the FDA is filled with many ex-drug executives, or the EPA have ex-oil executives appointed throughout many, many years. The richest groups pay for the lobbyists. And, the richest of the rich would be bankers. A black person voting for a Democrat is as laughable as a white person voting for a Republican. Yeah, they put out abortion & gay marraige, but it's a side show. Both Republicans and Democrats are ruled by lobbyists.
Let me give you an example. Remember the housing crisis? Obama came to Fort Myers. At that time, the legal system knew that the mortgages were faked. An attorney in Jacksonville even gave a continuing education course through the Florida Bar on how the signatures on documents were faked, about 6 months before President Obama was elected. As a result, she was getting loans written down to what the house was worth before the housing bubble. The powers that be did everything to stop her after her continuing education class. She was telling every lawyer in Florida. There is no doubt that the White House knew of these issues.
But, quietly, millions of americans were foreclosed. Finally, when the housing market spiriled down, then President Obama came up with a fix. It was to lower the interest rate on the houses for a 5 year period, but then hit the homeowner with a balloon payment in 30 years for the foregone interest (with additional interst tacked on). People signed up, thinking they were getting something great. If they realized, they stopped paying. The White House prayed on the people not understanding loans/economics. So, President Obama came out with a "refinance at today's rate" for FNMA backed loans. People signed up. Now, the banks have alot of good signatures on loan documetns that they are not going to lose. But, there was no reduction in principal fo the debt to undue the effects of the housing bubble that was created by Wall Street & the government. Reducing principal was the real ticket, but then Wall Street would haver to recognize huge losses. Instead, President Obama gave them a little bit of reduced future earnings, and newly signed, original mortgages! And, both parties gave the banks millions becuase "they were too big to fail."
Just like Obamacare. The architect of the plan admits it was passed becuase the American people were too stupid and didn't understand economics. . . . . My McKesson stock is souring through the roof since Obamacare was passed. Just saying . . . .
-
254
Michael Brown verdict discussion policy
by Simon init's likely that the grand jury verdict on the michael brown incident will be released in the coming days or weeks.. i've no doubt many people are going to feel strongly about things whatever the verdict is.. whatever the outcome though, here's what's not going to happen:.
we're not going to put up with inflamatory language and comments designed to rile others up.
be respectful.. we will not allow accusations of racism simply because some have a view of the verdict that contradicts others.. there will not be invented evidence or claims being repeated - if it's been falsely reported or debunked then it's off limits.. it's not going to be an opportunity for people to air past gripes over past discussions.. if you feel that you cannot discuss the subject in a rational way then it may be better to simply avoid any topics on the matter.. please try to be objective and respectful if you do decide to comment and not keen to take offense.
-
-
skeeter1
Desirous & Marvin,
I spoke on the Page 7, not only of the need to vote . . but of much larger issues. The issue, as I see it, is being stuck in poverty and getting "in trouble with the law" in a disporportionate amount as other races.
The powers that hold wealth, I think, don't really mind a day/week of a little rioting. The blacks/inner city are destroying their own neighborhood, furthering their poverty, and adding to the the picture that they are just mere thungs. Some rioting blows off their steam & frustration, and in a few days it will return to normal. They will be in poverty and the leaders (whether elitists or with money), will have to rule over/lead them becuase they are unruly. Manageable riotiing is encouraged becuase it keeps the masses impoverished (and they remain in power).
The real issue is poverty. President Clinton's top economic advisor identified the things that lead to poverty: 1) Not graduating from high school, 2) having a baby before one is 20 years old, or 3) single (usually mom) parents. Look at the absolute rise in these things from the black/inner city community. It's hard for a group of people to admit that they are going in the wrong direction. For a while, the strength of the "Million Man March" led me to hope. And, shows like MTV's "Teen Mom" is hopeful. But, the fact is over these past decades the numbers of black (and even whites) who are failing at #1, #2, and #3 has alot to do with the issue of frustration and loss of hope.
The other issue is technology. We have strong manufacturing, but it's not manual labor. It's being done by machines. Machinists, skilled labor, are in demand. The jobs for someone who has little set of job skills is restaurant and retail. Both, don't pay. Manual manufacturing jobs have gone overseas. The countries that take our jobs have no rules, give us bum products back (Chinese drywall, plastic in baby formula . . . ) and we can't sue them and our government is too woosy to put an import tax on it to help fix the issues the products cause. The US borrows a crapload of money from China, to dole out as welfare to the people being shafted by the powerful
The stuff that is manual, like pig factories, are being staffed by illegals (who may soon become citizens by President Obama's penstrike). The companies (like Smithfield Farms), advertise for workers in billboards in Central America. They come to the US, illegally, work, and send much of their money back to their families. And, our own government rounds up a few of the illegals, but is rare to round up the executives. Why won't companies, like Smithfield, hire more black people, who are legal? Nope, the powers that be are about to fix all that with legalizing millions of Central Americans, all for their vote. I find it absolutely frustrating. And, the blacks/inner city will riot for a few days over a case of two people, but fail to see the bigger picture, fail to vote, continue to perpetuate the stereotype, and not come together as a mass of people to change the inner city culture that has spiraled down the wrong path.
-
254
Michael Brown verdict discussion policy
by Simon init's likely that the grand jury verdict on the michael brown incident will be released in the coming days or weeks.. i've no doubt many people are going to feel strongly about things whatever the verdict is.. whatever the outcome though, here's what's not going to happen:.
we're not going to put up with inflamatory language and comments designed to rile others up.
be respectful.. we will not allow accusations of racism simply because some have a view of the verdict that contradicts others.. there will not be invented evidence or claims being repeated - if it's been falsely reported or debunked then it's off limits.. it's not going to be an opportunity for people to air past gripes over past discussions.. if you feel that you cannot discuss the subject in a rational way then it may be better to simply avoid any topics on the matter.. please try to be objective and respectful if you do decide to comment and not keen to take offense.
-
-
skeeter1
The judiciary is to decide the facts on one (1) specific case. Unfortunately, our society tends to want to place all of its discord onto the parties in the court case. The parties in the case become pawns for society's ills. It's fine if a case becomes a spring board for discussion of issues, and the community at large can change the situation through communication. But, putting societal discord onto the parties in the case is not the answer. It's just a scapegoat used by the governing powers, to divert attention, mask the solution, and perpetuate the problem so they may remain in a position of power over a constant state of turmoil.
It's like living in a Banana Republic. The police need the burglers to steal from the rich, so the police can make a report and then ask for extra bonus from the rich man to solve the case.
Think about it. The government wants a manageable riot. They really don't want the classes or races to live peacefully. Otherwise, there would be truly educational tv shows showing core values, instead of Housewives. . . . this would be ongoing, instead of an outburst here & there after a shooting.