Love Canal
beksbks
JoinedPosts by beksbks
-
56
Why you should not worry about Japan's nuclear reactor problems.
by beatthesystem ina nuclear reactor is built in such a way, that when operating normally, you take out all the moderator rods.
so if these radioactive materials are released into the environment, yes, radioactivity was released, but no, it is not dangerous, at all.
when the uranium splits, it generates a neutron (see above).
-
-
-
42
Radiation plume no danger to Arizona
by darthfader inthis may be of interest to those of us in the southwestern us.
in light of the graphc and story from the new york times -- which shows the flow over the pacific ocean and over the southwestern us: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/03/16/science/plume-graphic.html?ref=science.
this article discusses the exposure amount:.
-
-
beksbks
One of those reactors contains Plutonium, that's a bit different than Gamma rays, no?
-
56
Why you should not worry about Japan's nuclear reactor problems.
by beatthesystem ina nuclear reactor is built in such a way, that when operating normally, you take out all the moderator rods.
so if these radioactive materials are released into the environment, yes, radioactivity was released, but no, it is not dangerous, at all.
when the uranium splits, it generates a neutron (see above).
-
-
beksbks
They are detecting very small increases in radioactivity in Cali.
-
56
Why you should not worry about Japan's nuclear reactor problems.
by beatthesystem ina nuclear reactor is built in such a way, that when operating normally, you take out all the moderator rods.
so if these radioactive materials are released into the environment, yes, radioactivity was released, but no, it is not dangerous, at all.
when the uranium splits, it generates a neutron (see above).
-
-
beksbks
I keep hearing today, that the Japanese officials are essentially admitting that it's much worse than previously stated. They are now asking for help.
-
42
Radiation plume no danger to Arizona
by darthfader inthis may be of interest to those of us in the southwestern us.
in light of the graphc and story from the new york times -- which shows the flow over the pacific ocean and over the southwestern us: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/03/16/science/plume-graphic.html?ref=science.
this article discusses the exposure amount:.
-
-
beksbks
Here, this explains everything
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sakN2hSVxA&feature=player_embedded#at=173
-
-
-
beksbks
Perfect example of blind allegiance Sam. I take it you haven't you seen the unedited version of the O'keefe video? Fox lemmings.
-
-
-
beksbks
You know I hope this clown, Iron Head, never leaves this site, he's providing comic relief.... for free!
Yes, indeed, Sam!
Hooooooooot!!
-
-
-
beksbks
Sometimes my personal happiness does seem like the saddest thing...............................
Anyway, sleep tight! Don't let the bed bugs bite!
-
42
Radiation plume no danger to Arizona
by darthfader inthis may be of interest to those of us in the southwestern us.
in light of the graphc and story from the new york times -- which shows the flow over the pacific ocean and over the southwestern us: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/03/16/science/plume-graphic.html?ref=science.
this article discusses the exposure amount:.
-
-
beksbks
Flea ridden banana eater!
-
42
Radiation plume no danger to Arizona
by darthfader inthis may be of interest to those of us in the southwestern us.
in light of the graphc and story from the new york times -- which shows the flow over the pacific ocean and over the southwestern us: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/03/16/science/plume-graphic.html?ref=science.
this article discusses the exposure amount:.
-
-
beksbks
Whoa!! That means your fleas are radioactive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!