Posts by Kristofer

12

How is it that... (PLEASE provide input)

by AuldSoul in

during my discussion with death to the pixies i hit on something that he brushed off as irrelevant.

in trying to make it clearer for him why the question mattered to me i stumbled across the best proof for myself that this cannot be god's organization and the bible students/jws have been being lied to from the beginning.. in 1930 over 80,000 professed anointed had no clue that they were god's sole channel of communication to mankind, even though jehovah's witnesses now teach that the anointed have been that sole channel ever since pentecost of 33 c.e.. question #1: how is it possible that god's channel of communication didn't even know they were his channel of communication?.

question #2: if the true anointed brothers of christ have always been god's sole channel of communication to mankind since penetcost 33 c.e., why would jesus need to choose them in 1919; didn't he already know who god's channel was?.

Kristofer

do you have any documentation about the 80,000 annointed survey?

11

I'm confused about literature cited....

by Kristofer in

i noticed that some of the literature cited has references to pages in the hundreds like pg 127 etc.... i know the wt publishes books but are there any discrepencies between the original mags published and the bound versions?.

i ask because when i was presenting some info to a friend and gave her the source, she said, "how can that be?

this is a small magazine with only a few pages and you are saying the pages are in the hundreds?".

Kristofer

Thanks for the info. It all makes much more sense now.

21

Who would win?

by DigitalFokus in

jw
friends

who would win in a fist fight?

a dub or a mormon and why?

Kristofer

Well, I think the Mormon might win because he's probably packing a bike chain/lock. The dub might be able to use his little briefcase but...at the very end, the Mormon can always take off on his bike or run the dub over..

11

I'm confused about literature cited....

by Kristofer in

i noticed that some of the literature cited has references to pages in the hundreds like pg 127 etc.... i know the wt publishes books but are there any discrepencies between the original mags published and the bound versions?.

i ask because when i was presenting some info to a friend and gave her the source, she said, "how can that be?

this is a small magazine with only a few pages and you are saying the pages are in the hundreds?".

Kristofer

I just read on another thread that the bound volumes will still be made...

11

I'm confused about literature cited....

by Kristofer in

i noticed that some of the literature cited has references to pages in the hundreds like pg 127 etc.... i know the wt publishes books but are there any discrepencies between the original mags published and the bound versions?.

i ask because when i was presenting some info to a friend and gave her the source, she said, "how can that be?

this is a small magazine with only a few pages and you are saying the pages are in the hundreds?".

Kristofer

So they are bound by year?

And new numbers are imprinted at the bottom of the pages?

11

I'm confused about literature cited....

by Kristofer in

i noticed that some of the literature cited has references to pages in the hundreds like pg 127 etc.... i know the wt publishes books but are there any discrepencies between the original mags published and the bound versions?.

i ask because when i was presenting some info to a friend and gave her the source, she said, "how can that be?

this is a small magazine with only a few pages and you are saying the pages are in the hundreds?".

Kristofer

so it's not far fetched to have an Awake mag with more than a hundred pages because it's part of the bound version?

AM I correct in assuming that?

11

I'm confused about literature cited....

by Kristofer in

i noticed that some of the literature cited has references to pages in the hundreds like pg 127 etc.... i know the wt publishes books but are there any discrepencies between the original mags published and the bound versions?.

i ask because when i was presenting some info to a friend and gave her the source, she said, "how can that be?

this is a small magazine with only a few pages and you are saying the pages are in the hundreds?".

Kristofer

I noticed that some of the literature cited has references to pages in the hundreds like Pg 127 etc...

I know the WT publishes books but are there any discrepencies between the original mags published and the bound versions?

I ask because when I was presenting some info to a friend and gave her the source, she said, "how can that be? This is a small magazine with only a few pages and you are saying the pages are in the hundreds?"

I'm confused....

Can anyone help explain? Are there different sources? discrepencies? Am I not making any sense?

45

Elders teach "Don't raise your hat to a lady! - it's worldly."

by ozziepost in

back when i was a boy in the 1950s many men wore hats and so did my father.. one evening at the kh he was called in to the backroom by the elders for a 'meeting after the meeting',.

his crime?

he had been seen raising his hat when greeting women!!!!.