I think they think they have the truth, or the closest thing possible.
I believe they are in doubt. They are waiting for an inspiration through Jehovah and his angels - personally.
or are they just stringing the rank and file along, getting every ounce of work out of thier constituents, long enough to pull the next rabbit out of the hat?
those at the top, don't they see where they've made mistakes?
how can they continue in good conscience before the god they profess to serve?
I think they think they have the truth, or the closest thing possible.
I believe they are in doubt. They are waiting for an inspiration through Jehovah and his angels - personally.
The greatest miracle is:
Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing?
The old question to the philosophers. Nobody can answer;-)
see: http://www.humboldt-foundation.de/kosmos/titel/2004_009.htm
this is a topic i wanted to have a discussion about for quite some time but didnt know if anyone at all would be interested.
there is quite a buzz in scientific community in last 10 years about real possibility that our universe is only one of say 10 to the power of 500 universes around all in their separate dimensions.
such a notion is truly mind-boggling when you think of what the implications really are.
zagor
please without dogmatism, I've had enough of that in WTBS for 10 lifetimes.
Where do you find any dogmatism in that homepage? Please tell it. Is it the meaning of the tetragrammaton ?
http://www.sensortime.com/jhwh-e.html ?
No, sorry: This has nothing to do with any RELIGION !!! This excerpt exclusively belongs to science, to metamathematics and propositional calculus ! Please study Kurt Goedel, Tarski, Church, Douglas Hofstadter.
And besides: Buy the book "The Forgotten Legacy of Goedel and Einstein" (author: Palle Yourgrau) and study it intensively! It might be an important help for you!
this is a topic i wanted to have a discussion about for quite some time but didnt know if anyone at all would be interested.
there is quite a buzz in scientific community in last 10 years about real possibility that our universe is only one of say 10 to the power of 500 universes around all in their separate dimensions.
such a notion is truly mind-boggling when you think of what the implications really are.
zagor
the grade someone I' for one, have studied physics and know what it takes to have well-tuned insight
Praises for you! But note: there are thousands of people who never attended a university having more skills, wisdom and knowledge than those who graduated as doctor.
You wrote about POPPER`s fallibilism. He never postulated, that the criteria of falsifibility depends on the grade someone received at the university.
fly (I have only "master" grade;-))
this is a topic i wanted to have a discussion about for quite some time but didnt know if anyone at all would be interested.
there is quite a buzz in scientific community in last 10 years about real possibility that our universe is only one of say 10 to the power of 500 universes around all in their separate dimensions.
such a notion is truly mind-boggling when you think of what the implications really are.
zagor
...to be both falsifiable and verifiable needs to go through barrage of tests of scientific peers. That's is why we have magazines such as Nature..
Oh man, oh man...
If you are skilled in science, e.g. informatics, robotics and so on.., you certainly know that ONLY few high-grade-scientists (mostly members of freemasonry etc) have the privilege to publish !!! See Hwang Woo Suk ("cloning pioneer") - he published DOZENS of articles in magazines... And - is he a serious scientist ??
this is a topic i wanted to have a discussion about for quite some time but didnt know if anyone at all would be interested.
there is quite a buzz in scientific community in last 10 years about real possibility that our universe is only one of say 10 to the power of 500 universes around all in their separate dimensions.
such a notion is truly mind-boggling when you think of what the implications really are.
zagor.
People like your Mr. .... pop up everywhere. They have most extraordinary claims ranging from extracting energy form nothing to driving car on water alone
Did you read such a statement or claim in www.sensortime.com/time-e.html ? I did not.
Rather, he even decribed the NEURAL CODE (brain function) on base of his "elapse-time-theory".
this is a topic i wanted to have a discussion about for quite some time but didnt know if anyone at all would be interested.
there is quite a buzz in scientific community in last 10 years about real possibility that our universe is only one of say 10 to the power of 500 universes around all in their separate dimensions.
such a notion is truly mind-boggling when you think of what the implications really are.
zagor
this site has nothing to do with sicence and everything to do with pseudoscience
No. I do not think so. "Pseudoscience" is speculativ. Its actual the same as "metaphysics" E.g. every sort of religion; but also aliens living in parallel universes; or even string theory based on 11 dimensions...etc.
In contrary, the man who described this patent description, had carefully and exactly described an invention BASED on his theory. In this way, the theory got both falsifiable and verifiable too. Because you can build that robot on base of this U.- theory.
Tell me any scientist who had described a new universal theory on base of an invention. You will NEVER find someone. Look all magazines like science, nature and so on - you will never find the same.
this is a topic i wanted to have a discussion about for quite some time but didnt know if anyone at all would be interested.
there is quite a buzz in scientific community in last 10 years about real possibility that our universe is only one of say 10 to the power of 500 universes around all in their separate dimensions.
such a notion is truly mind-boggling when you think of what the implications really are.
Hello zagor
I did not study Richard Staffords theory well enough. But nevertheless, I do not believe that he really understood the "nature of TIME" .
Rather, read: http://www.sensortime.com/time-e.html (Method to Generate Self-Organizing Processes in Autonomous Mechanisms and Organisms; The Ultimate Technology)
This man grasped the "nature of time" in the right manner, I think.
this is a topic i wanted to have a discussion about for quite some time but didnt know if anyone at all would be interested.
there is quite a buzz in scientific community in last 10 years about real possibility that our universe is only one of say 10 to the power of 500 universes around all in their separate dimensions.
such a notion is truly mind-boggling when you think of what the implications really are.
Besides: I am new here. Greetings to all.
At least, I think so. ( I lost my mind and my memory (total amnesia;-)).
this is a topic i wanted to have a discussion about for quite some time but didnt know if anyone at all would be interested.
there is quite a buzz in scientific community in last 10 years about real possibility that our universe is only one of say 10 to the power of 500 universes around all in their separate dimensions.
such a notion is truly mind-boggling when you think of what the implications really are.
are aliens actual “divine beings” of the Bible
Hello. I think you are right. Modern physics postulates the existence of parallel multiple universes (see David Deutsch or Hugh Everett).
Besides: There is no irreconcilable conflict between quantum mechanics and general relativity theory. The only problem is how to define "the nature of TIME" in a new manner. If once done, they have a new G.U.T. There even is no need for 10 oder more "dimensions" or super strings.