Best description to FT's nonsense thus far cofty
thank you
richard dawkins admitted that information inside of dna, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boncjbrrdq8 )richard dawkins further admitted, in a debate with francis collins for time magazine, that science might point to a creator existing, but that this creator might not be anything like yahweh:.
time: "could the answer be god?
Best description to FT's nonsense thus far cofty
thank you
richard dawkins admitted that information inside of dna, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boncjbrrdq8 )richard dawkins further admitted, in a debate with francis collins for time magazine, that science might point to a creator existing, but that this creator might not be anything like yahweh:.
time: "could the answer be god?
No conspiracy, I asked you a question @$$hat. Lol. No conspiracy? I guess you are just a Dawkins fan then.
I retract any nice thing I said earlier. People who belief in god are dumb. Lucky for them I won't kill them for not believing my way, just laugh at their madness. You are all very cute.
On with godlessness infedels!
richard dawkins admitted that information inside of dna, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boncjbrrdq8 )richard dawkins further admitted, in a debate with francis collins for time magazine, that science might point to a creator existing, but that this creator might not be anything like yahweh:.
time: "could the answer be god?
richard dawkins admitted that information inside of dna, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boncjbrrdq8 )richard dawkins further admitted, in a debate with francis collins for time magazine, that science might point to a creator existing, but that this creator might not be anything like yahweh:.
time: "could the answer be god?
To precisely the same extent nobody can know the world was not created by a pink unicorn or tooth fairies don't leave money under children's pillows.
FT and Ruby do you even read things like this and think about it?
Everyone spends 99% of these threads debating how they debate. No love loss to Viv and Cofty, I am just saying its a downward spiral from here lol
Every time someone want to preach their faith in the abrahamic virus/plague of mankind, it drives us all insane because the subject matter is insane to begin with. And no FT I didn't just call you an idiot, I called discussing the bible a kind of insanity.
richard dawkins admitted that information inside of dna, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boncjbrrdq8 )richard dawkins further admitted, in a debate with francis collins for time magazine, that science might point to a creator existing, but that this creator might not be anything like yahweh:.
time: "could the answer be god?
Again to FT, atheist don't care what fairy tales people want to believe, it's when they use their fairy tales to impact negatively the lives of others that we get upset in people who believe and swear by the unknown.
richard dawkins admitted that information inside of dna, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boncjbrrdq8 )richard dawkins further admitted, in a debate with francis collins for time magazine, that science might point to a creator existing, but that this creator might not be anything like yahweh:.
time: "could the answer be god?
This refutes those atheists who say anyone who believes in a Creator is STUPID or an IDIOT.
Oh my, I don't even know what to say...
These atheist you speak simply don't understand why you would believe "possibility" crosses the street to "is".
Now you might say oh no, i am just saying possibility. Well your motives seem clear that you believe possibility is a fact and not an unknown.
But that is up to you, they acknowledge that, I think what make atheist think creationists are STUPID or an IDOIT (your words) is the forcing of what you believe is "POSSIBLE" on others, or HARMING based on possibility and imagination, basing your actions good or bad on the POSSIBILITY of something that is unconfirmed on the unknown and unnecessary.
from 2 samuel 24. i am so mad at myself for not making a comment how could anyone explain this away?
then after he slaughters 70,000 he then feels regret?
Lets put some perspective on this, on 9/11 almost 3000 lives were snuffed out, and people were mortified at the callous brutality required to instantaneously murder 3000 people.
This is 23 times that amount of people murdered
why?
An administrative mistake by David? God snuffs out 70...effing...thousand lives. for that.
More perspective. Lets say in God's eyes, Lett and boys policies on pedophiles is wrong, so to teach them a lesson god kills every man, woman & child in about 700 hundred congregations.
Tell me the Bible is a good book, please...
And HMTM if you were even remotely correct about that (which the part that people blamed and Imaginary god for everything we agree), but if that is the case, god is real, and this is his holy word and proof of his existence...
Satan 1
God 0
Devil wins this one
richard dawkins admitted that information inside of dna, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boncjbrrdq8 )richard dawkins further admitted, in a debate with francis collins for time magazine, that science might point to a creator existing, but that this creator might not be anything like yahweh:.
time: "could the answer be god?