Posts by freemindfade

29

United Nations Global Peace And Security Announcement September 2015 / Attack On Christians

by Timothex in

jw
friends

the united nations will shortly announce global peace and security.

this will result in the attack on the true religion [ jehovah's witnesses ] lead by pope francis and intern will bring armageddon / paradise.

please brothers and sisters share this information with everyone!

freemindfade

That PDF looks pretty... amateur?

324

VA shooting suspect was raised a JW! He mentions it on his Twitter account

by WingCommander in

jw
friends

anyone in the usa following this morning's shooting "on-air" live tv will know what i'm talking about.

bryce williams (not real name, but on-air name) shot and killed 2 people on live television this morning in roanoke, va. he was wearing a go-pro camera, and uploaded his first-person video onto his social media accounts.

i've seen his twitter feed (before it was taken down), and not very far down he mentions being raised a jw.

freemindfade

Ok, that's a new low "friend." I've been around guns all my life. I've spent many a day in third world shitholes. Hell, I used to be based in Khobar, site of the terrorist attack. All I'm doing is trying to expand the debate on accountability. Either by gun restriction, or regulation. I too, walk down the street without cowering, or living my life under a rock, just as I've done while overseas, in 3rd world backwaters. There are alot of people, women and children, who don't share your John Wayne bravado. There are a lot of people--US citizens who VOTE, that think we, in the US can do better than a 3rd world banana republic, when it comes to gun policy. The fact is that the Swiss example works. The Aussie example works. Not saying that we copy them verbatim. And neither model, SPECIFICALLY the Swiss one, equates to..."their gonna git our guns!!!" But, by your standards, they're all pussys anyway, right?

You didn't read anything did you. I am not debating the gun part. Your John Wayne reference and gun policy, I am not talking about that but you keep going back to it. I've already said legal or illegal I don't care. Easy to get hard to get, whatever. All I can control is that I am not a psycho bent on spree killings. I have nothing to do with the NRA or any kind of pro gun anything. being afraid to come to America like I hear on here is comical.

You obviously don't care to admit that the US has a problem, or if you do, then you don't want to do anything about it. Fine. Like the old saying goes, "lead, follow, or get out of the way."

Again you are straw maning this to death. Ive been saying that America has multiple problems if you had been paying attention.

I'd like to see you walk into an Aussie pub and set your glass on the counter, upside-down. Then, you can get back to me on how the Aussies are all "pussys."

*yawn*

If you had the guts to call me that in my face, it wouldn't go down well, "friend."

*yawn again*

Are you sure you don't keep a big gun around to compensate for something else you lack?

Well... i never speak for myself, that wouldn't make any sense, but maybe I can find some nice Australian ladies not to afraid to visit america to check that out for you ;)

Like 'The Rebel,' mentioned, individuals can make a difference. And we will. So, step aside little boy, and let the grown-ups deal with this.

You've missed everything I've said, probably from your blind emotional rage. My whole point in my last post was what a small difference the individual can make. Most of these spree shooters have something in common, they leak information of what they are going to do. if the individual paid attention to others they could prevent a lot of mess, but it turns out that is more complicated than cherry picking sensational ideas from headlines.

You seem pretty upset, perhaps you should take a deep breath and have a fosters. Its not worth having a stroke over a debate. I mean look at me, the John Wayne american cool headed, not pounding my chest and trying to act like a big scary man. Whats the world coming to.

And for the record, i did not call Aussies pu$$ys. I was referring to someone so afraid and paranoid of america they wouldn't come here .

14

Why doesn't Jesus appear to you ?

by opusdei1972 in

the new testament tells us stories about miracles, people speaking in different languages by the holy spirit, jesus appearing to many of his disciples.

but, why this was only a first century phenomenom???.

here some reasoning: http://godisimaginary.com/i15.htm.

freemindfade

Dionysus appeared to me after drinking many many glasses of whisky

324

VA shooting suspect was raised a JW! He mentions it on his Twitter account

by WingCommander in

jw
friends

anyone in the usa following this morning's shooting "on-air" live tv will know what i'm talking about.

bryce williams (not real name, but on-air name) shot and killed 2 people on live television this morning in roanoke, va. he was wearing a go-pro camera, and uploaded his first-person video onto his social media accounts.

i've seen his twitter feed (before it was taken down), and not very far down he mentions being raised a jw.

freemindfade

Mr Stratofortress...

Ok, so you've identified a root cause. According to your 'root cause analysis,' it's revenge (on steroids) which motivates killers like Dylan and Erick of Columbine Infamy.

Wrong. I am saying the INFAMY motivates them. It’s not revenge, its revenge on a stage. But beyond that I am saying things changed with them. They set a new standard that each wacko has been trying to achieve since.

Now let's say, that as someone in the aviation field, I wanted to find a root cause as to why planes crash. By applying similar logic as you have, I deduce that gravity is to blame. Therefore, I ask the manufacturers to design an anti-gravity device. Then, I'll see about getting ejection seats installed in all passenger seats. You see where I'm going with this?

I don’t because it makes no sense. A more intelligent analogy would be why someone would intentionally crash a plane. I’m not analyzing why or how a bullet kills someone when it hits them. Sorry this nonsense is completely lost on me.
It's obviously impossible to address this root cause directly. All I have suggested is that when a sensational shooting happens in America, it is oversimplified to ‘Gun Control’ to promote a special interest when yes there are a lot of factors, guns being one.

Now, back to Dylan and Erick. Their motivation was revenge. On steroids, as you say. Fine. Now, what solution do you propose?

Did I say I had a solution? Nope. I didn’t . If this phenomenon has transcended simply a gun control problem, does it make sense for us to put blinders on to all other factors? And just guns guns guns it was guns that caused this. That’s a Band-Aid.

Now that you've identified a cause. Do you want to develop a device that flies around and measures peoples' 'motivation for revenge?' Should we come up with 'thought police' as in "1984." Hmmm, a bit impractical as I see it.

Your fallacious reasoning suggests I implied anything like this. When I did not, these are your ideas my friend. Don’t put things out there like this, this kind of stuff doesn’t go over well here.
I wake up every day without fear, and I live my life standing up. I could be walking down the street and somebody who just got fired or screwed over could decide to plow into me and my dog for no reason. The universe is indifferent. It sucks, and shit happens. I am fine not being in control. But I wont be a paranoid pu$$y like I hear being talked about on here, “I won’t go to America or I’ll be murdered”. I go to your countries even though most of you are very passive to something far more insidious, Islamic extremists. But I don’t act like a big baby and bitch about it, because I am going to live my life in absolute paranoia or wait on the government and police to solve every problem I might have, no more than I am “waiting on Jehovah” to fix everything.

You want to blame sensationalist media? Then I assume you're ok with trashing the First Amendment.

Again dude, the fallacies. You are very good at using the straw man fallacy over and over. You must have been a fantastic witness. Elder? Pioneer maybe? You are in effect saying that because I think the United States Media sensationalizes stories involving murder and fear and suffering, that I disagree with the first amendment. I never said “do away with the media” or “do away with the first amendment”. I personally ignore sensational media sources. And most news all together. That has nothing to do with you just stated.

Prior to this massacre, there had been others, though not as large. Since the buyback program, there have been no such massacres at all, in Aussie land since '96. NONE. Now, keep in mind, that there have likely been people there, who were 'motivated by revenge on steroids.' But it's a but hard to act out these motivations if you have no, or at least restricted access to the tools that make this possible. And please, spare us the nonsense about how..."they can use a machete." Or, " they can get a can of gasoline and start a fire." Yes, there have been very isolated incidents like this here and there, but you can't even BEGIN to equate that with the chronic mass shooting problem as it exists in the US.

America has a ‘gun’ psychology, jihadists have a 'tie a bomb to your ass psychology'. Again none of what you are saying has to do with my position that there is a psychology to commit sensationalized spree shootings in a America. You are still talking about gun laws and patting Australia on the back. You are all very knowledgeable of the efficient killing capability of a firearm, but if fatality numbers were all these folks cared about, they would go the Timothy McVey route, shit he killed 168 people and injured like 600 others without firing a shot, he also didn’t go shoot himself. Motive. The spree shooting is about more than death.

A) Imitate the Australian example. Which is heavy restriction to gun access. Part of the reason this has worked in Australia is geography. It's more difficult to smuggle illegal weapons onto an island. Hence, US borders would need some major beefing up.
or
B) Follow the Swiss example. Which is an expansion of regulation, over not just guns, but ammo as well. Perhaps expand the idea of National Guard, or IRR (ready reserves) to allow for assault weapons to be kept at home, but with strict rules on training, procedures, and weapon securing. Also include strict penalties for non-compmiance. So, your kid gets hold of your weapon, and shoots up his school, then your irresponsible ass is going to Leavenworth for a looong time.

These solutions still are too basic. EVERYONE wants to cherry pick what they think it is. But they miss the point. One of the best articles I have read that describes what I am getting and, and you don’t seem to understand is this.
http://markmanson.net/school-shootings
Here are some of the things I took out of it, I hope help you understand, but I recommend reading the whole thing.
By 1999, there had already been a series of school shootings across the United States… They were small-time jobs, amateur hour. Eric was far more interested in Timothy McVeigh’s bombing of the Oklahoma City federal building…
But he didn’t just want to top the body count, he wanted to top the notoriety, the fame, the horror. He wanted to terrorize people and he understood that his best weapon was not the guns he secretly purchased or the bombs he built in his basement — it was television. He would not kill jocks or preps, he would kill indiscriminately, because that’s what caused the most fear and got the most attention. He wouldn’t just blow up the school, but he’d blow up the parking lot, the police cars and the firefighters and the journalists who rushed to the scene. He would, quite literally, go out with a bang, the shockwaves of which, carried by mass media and the internet, would reverberate through the world for decades.
As chaos engulfed the school in Colorado, it would quickly fan out accros the country, commanding more or less 24-hour television coverage for weeks on end. The drama would be replayed endlessly — bloodied and crippled students climbing out of the library window, the heroic coach who lost his life saving dozens of kids. And then there would be the questions and the speculation. Why? First it was goth culture and Marilyn Manson. Then it was bullying. Then it was being social loners and outcasts.All of the explanations were later discovered to be untrue. The event truly seemed inexplicable. And because it was inexplicable the media and the viewers couldn’t let it go. Books were written. Memorials were built and ceremonies filled out. Eric Harris got his death wish: “Columbine” was a household name.But this “witch hunt” we go through every time a school shooting happens is a total ruse. Elliot Rodger didn’t become a killer because he was a misogynist; he became a misogynist because he was a killer. Just like Eric Harris didn’t become a killer because he loved violent video games; he loved violent video games because he was a killer. Just like Adam Lanza didn’t become a killer because he loved guns; he loved guns because he was a killer.Every school shooting incident comes in the same dreary package: an angry, politically-charged rant, shrink-wrapped around a core of mental illness and neglect. These shooters leave behind journals, videos, diagrams, manifestos and treatises. They broadcast their plans and intentions to their friends and family. They email news outlets minutes before they start firing. They write down their plans and make checklists so that others may follow in their footsteps. They go on angry rants against materialism, hedonism, the government, mass media, women, and sometimes even the people close to them.
And each time, as a culture, we work ourselves into a frenzy debating the angry exterior message, while ignoring the interior life and context of each killer. We miss the point entirely.According to the FBI, mass shootings (defined as shooting events that kill at least four people) occur on average every two weeks in the United States. Yes, every two weeks. Yet we rarely, if ever, hear about most of them. The reason is because these shootings are easily explainable. In most mass shootings, the crimes occur at a private location and the victims are people close and well-known to the shooter — family members, neighbors, friends. Many of them are attributable to gang violence or illicit criminal activities. Others are a crime of passion.
School shootings only account for 4% of all mass shootings and yet they dominate the news media and get the entire country talking about them for weeks on end.
There are a few reasons for this:
They occur in everyday public locations which are supposed to be safe.

The victims are targeted and killed at random.
The victims are innocent bystanders and often children.
The killers leave behind large amounts of material about themselves for the media to share.
The perpetrator and victims are generally upper-middle class, white, and privileged.
These shooters know what they are doing.

They’re not “crazy.” They don’t just “snap.” Most of them spend months or years planning their massacres. Elliot Rodger had apparently been planning his shooting for over a year. You don’t just show up with a 140-page manifesto and a large stockpile of weapons one day. You work at it for a long time. And you plan not only the violence, but the presentation for the audience, the performance — what they will see from you, what they will hear from you, the reasons why, the message. It’s all very conscious and deliberate.

And it works. Their killing sprees are specifically targeted to generate the most fear and uncertainty from the public, because the more fear and uncertainty they generate, the more attention they get. They then use all of the attention as a platform to promote themselves or whatever complaints they may have against society. It’s the Columbine formula. It works. And as Eric Harris pointed out in his journal, it’s not about the guns. It’s about the television. The films. The fame. The revolution.
An FBI study on school shooters found school shootings are never a result of a crazy person “snapping.” Most shooters do have serious mental health or emotional issues, but they all plan their attacks months or even years in advance. And as they plan, they almost always “leak” information about the attack beforehand, sometimes intentionally, and sometimes in incredibly obvious ways.
Both Harris and Rodger had the police called on them multiple times due to suspicious behavior. Both of them had a history of strange and violent outbursts towards friends and those close to them. Both put their intentions and their angry rants up on the web for everyone to see. Elliot Rodger wrote and re-wrote his plan out, sometimes including murdering his family members and stealing their car. He wrote that if someone had just searched his room, it would have all come apart, he would have been found out. Eric Harris wrote almost the exact same thing 15 years earlier.
Seung-Hui Cho, the Virginia Tech shooter who killed 32 people, turned in paper after paper that depicted gruesome killings and gun violence. He had a history of mental health issues and had been reported to the campus police four times for aggressive and antisocial behavior, particularly towards women. One of his professors went so far as to tell the board that she would rather resign than teach another class with him in it.
Adam Lanza, the Sandy Hook shooter, also had a history of mental illness and inappropriate anti-social behavior. And he too, began sharing his intentions online through forum posts and audio. Lanza had paranoid delusions about mass media and the government, and began to argue that school shootings were justified as a form of protest or revolt. People humored him and ignored him. No one realized he had a small armory of semi-automatic weapons in his house…
Gun control gets the headlines. Mental health care gets the headlines. Violence and video games and misogyny and internet forums and atheism — the list is endless at this point…
Despite being relevant and important discussions, the glamorous headlines are ultimately distractions — they just feed into the carnage and the attention and the fame the killer desired. They are distractions from what is right in front of you and me and the victims of tomorrow’s shooting: people who need help. And while we’re all fighting over whose pet cause is more right and more true and more noble, there’s likely another young man out there, maybe suicidally depressed, maybe paranoid and delusional, maybe a psychopath, and he’s researching guns and bombs and mapping out schools and recording videos and thinking every day about the anger and hate he feels for this world.
And no one is paying attention to him.

38

Hello

by Munster Abu in

jw
friends

new here but looking forward to joining in some of the discussions with you all.. a small bit about me: i'm shane.

was raised as a jw in the uk by my mum (single parent family) from about 2 years of age.

got baptised at 15 for all the wrong reasons.

freemindfade

Welcome

179

Largest amount of refugees since WW2 in Europe

by Powermetal4ever in

jw
friends

so i had a discussion with my mother about this, and she claims that because of this that: "we are surely living in the last days right now" while i must admit myself that the situation seem chaotic, i don't want to believe that it is the last days.

so question is, how do i face an opinion like that?

freemindfade

Wanna barrow trump?

324

VA shooting suspect was raised a JW! He mentions it on his Twitter account

by WingCommander in

jw
friends

anyone in the usa following this morning's shooting "on-air" live tv will know what i'm talking about.

bryce williams (not real name, but on-air name) shot and killed 2 people on live television this morning in roanoke, va. he was wearing a go-pro camera, and uploaded his first-person video onto his social media accounts.

i've seen his twitter feed (before it was taken down), and not very far down he mentions being raised a jw.

freemindfade

As far as 'celebrity maniacs,' I'm afraid I don't know what you're talking about. I think that, you might be referring to well-known people who don't share your views. But, I'm not sure.

What I am talking about is the uniquely american "shoot your way to infamy"

You see, the psychology of gun ownership and even typical gun violence is very different. How so?

Lets take this Vester mess. Lets say he cracks, wants revenge, and has a gun. He waits outside the station, these two walk out, he gets his "revenge" they are dead. The story floods local headlines and then maybe , MAYBE, gets a small footnote reference on national news feeds, but most likely not. No this is whats happened. Vester Flanagan was delusional, for what sees to be most his life. He was a narcissist, paranoid, angry, if he thinks the desert god was talking to him, he most likely has some schizophrenia. So what did he do?

Well he admired those who have become infamous american sociopath monsters. Household names, they insight fear and terror. They achieved "evil" celebrity status. Again I think you guys are way simplifying this that this was just some asshole that wanted revenge, again thats only a piece. This coward wanted fame. His revenge came with a desire to be known, to be a monster to achieve infamy.

Again this problem is uniquely american. Yea sure we have more guns than other places, the makes it EASIER to find one I am sure. How many countries have no guns at all? There are guns that can be got, especially illegally. Still it remains these stomach turning shooting stories remain an american problem. I have no problem associating gun violence in america with volume of guns. But these theatrical attention grabbing killings, are a deeper issue america has.

Think about Colombine, they had so sadistically planned it out, Erick and Dylan became immortal which is what they wanted. The media helped for sure. These assholes were Deified by the media, not for good but evil, but immortalized none the less. The day before Colombine they were nobodies, the day after they were all anyone was talking about. Vester Flanagan. He WAS a nobody, now we know his name, we know his life story, and we saw the monster he was capable of being.

Again these attention seeking mass murders are really an american phenomenon and the stakes get higher and higher, each one idolizes the last and tries to up the anti on savagery or shock value. In Vesters case, live TV, also he filmed it and streamed it. The church shooting, newton ct if you go back through you see these things get more and more twisted because someone wants to be the next Erick and Dylan. The pattern has been set with the gun, and yes it is an efficient killing tool. But its become a part of the theatrics, especially in the media.

So you change gun laws, ok, great. It will probably contribute to the already declining numbers of gun related crime in America that no one likes to acknowledge. Thats great. Here is a good question thought, is it going to stop the next person that wants to be the next Erick and Dylan? I highly doubt that, because their motive is not revenge, its revenge on steroids. They are determined to become and immortal monster even if they have to die doing it. Its sick. This problem is next level.

The husband of the surviving woman who was being interviewed at the time said the following about it:

Mr Gardner told Fox News that he doesn't think the gun was the issue in the attack against his wife.

'He was bound and determined to try to make a name for himself on live TV because he failed at it so many times,' Mr Gardner said. 'So no, I don’t blame the gun, I blame the guy that was holding the gun.'

Mr Gardner says if he was barred from getting a gun, Flanagan could have killed with a knife or machete.

Gun violence in America is a problem, these "Infamy" shootings, are a more complex problem.

I think the discussion about gun violence is a good one, but when newton Ct, or something like this happens, to use it as the reason WHY we need more controls, is stepping over bigger issues to get to the easy one.

There are 320 millions people in America, there is nearly 300 million guns. What do you believe is going to happen to all of those if a new law is passed? They will just magically disappear? unfortunately those are here probably to stay. An outright complete ban on guns would not stop someone bent on destruction from finding one, it may make it more difficult, but they are going to find a way.

34

Hebrew Was The First Language

by Bloody Hotdogs! in

according to the newest watchtower:.

jehovah communicated with adam in the garden of eden, using human language.

god likely did so in an ancient form of hebrew.

freemindfade

No offense to my modern Hebrew speakers... but for me it is not the prettiest language. Arabic either.

I think we should all speak Italian when we get to the paradise petting zoo

34

Hebrew Was The First Language

by Bloody Hotdogs! in

according to the newest watchtower:.

jehovah communicated with adam in the garden of eden, using human language.

god likely did so in an ancient form of hebrew.

freemindfade

I love when they print stuff like this because it shows how clueless they are to reality.

324

VA shooting suspect was raised a JW! He mentions it on his Twitter account

by WingCommander in

jw
friends

anyone in the usa following this morning's shooting "on-air" live tv will know what i'm talking about.

bryce williams (not real name, but on-air name) shot and killed 2 people on live television this morning in roanoke, va. he was wearing a go-pro camera, and uploaded his first-person video onto his social media accounts.

i've seen his twitter feed (before it was taken down), and not very far down he mentions being raised a jw.

freemindfade

@ LoveUniHateExams, honestly I feel kinda bad for you, we all say honest and shocking things, I'm not innocent, but to make a public declaration of bigotry is pretty extreme.

New York city, and I mean the real New York city, is probably one of the most diverse places and I love it, so for you to have a bigoted view of diversity, its really just sad. For me anyway, but carry on, its your freedom.