Sorry... "cowards", thats more politically correct no?
To say America is too scary of a place to be in, is pretty extreme, whoever from where ever is saying such a general paranoid thing.
anyone in the usa following this morning's shooting "on-air" live tv will know what i'm talking about.
bryce williams (not real name, but on-air name) shot and killed 2 people on live television this morning in roanoke, va. he was wearing a go-pro camera, and uploaded his first-person video onto his social media accounts.
i've seen his twitter feed (before it was taken down), and not very far down he mentions being raised a jw.
Sorry... "cowards", thats more politically correct no?
To say America is too scary of a place to be in, is pretty extreme, whoever from where ever is saying such a general paranoid thing.
the united nations will shortly announce global peace and security.
this will result in the attack on the true religion [ jehovah's witnesses ] lead by pope francis and intern will bring armageddon / paradise.
please brothers and sisters share this information with everyone!
@_Morpheus lmao!
Except the grand climax was not at hand if you know what I mean...
the united nations will shortly announce global peace and security.
this will result in the attack on the true religion [ jehovah's witnesses ] lead by pope francis and intern will bring armageddon / paradise.
please brothers and sisters share this information with everyone!
anyone in the usa following this morning's shooting "on-air" live tv will know what i'm talking about.
bryce williams (not real name, but on-air name) shot and killed 2 people on live television this morning in roanoke, va. he was wearing a go-pro camera, and uploaded his first-person video onto his social media accounts.
i've seen his twitter feed (before it was taken down), and not very far down he mentions being raised a jw.
Ok, that's a new low "friend." I've been around guns all my life. I've spent many a day in third world shitholes. Hell, I used to be based in Khobar, site of the terrorist attack. All I'm doing is trying to expand the debate on accountability. Either by gun restriction, or regulation. I too, walk down the street without cowering, or living my life under a rock, just as I've done while overseas, in 3rd world backwaters. There are alot of people, women and children, who don't share your John Wayne bravado. There are a lot of people--US citizens who VOTE, that think we, in the US can do better than a 3rd world banana republic, when it comes to gun policy. The fact is that the Swiss example works. The Aussie example works. Not saying that we copy them verbatim. And neither model, SPECIFICALLY the Swiss one, equates to..."their gonna git our guns!!!" But, by your standards, they're all pussys anyway, right?
You didn't read anything did you. I am not debating the gun part. Your John Wayne reference and gun policy, I am not talking about that but you keep going back to it. I've already said legal or illegal I don't care. Easy to get hard to get, whatever. All I can control is that I am not a psycho bent on spree killings. I have nothing to do with the NRA or any kind of pro gun anything. being afraid to come to America like I hear on here is comical.
You obviously don't care to admit that the US has a problem, or if you do, then you don't want to do anything about it. Fine. Like the old saying goes, "lead, follow, or get out of the way."
Again you are straw maning this to death. Ive been saying that America has multiple problems if you had been paying attention.
I'd like to see you walk into an Aussie pub and set your glass on the counter, upside-down. Then, you can get back to me on how the Aussies are all "pussys."
*yawn*
If you had the guts to call me that in my face, it wouldn't go down well, "friend."
*yawn again*
Are you sure you don't keep a big gun around to compensate for something else you lack?
Well... i never speak for myself, that wouldn't make any sense, but maybe I can find some nice Australian ladies not to afraid to visit america to check that out for you ;)
Like 'The Rebel,' mentioned, individuals can make a difference. And we will. So, step aside little boy, and let the grown-ups deal with this.
You've missed everything I've said, probably from your blind emotional rage. My whole point in my last post was what a small difference the individual can make. Most of these spree shooters have something in common, they leak information of what they are going to do. if the individual paid attention to others they could prevent a lot of mess, but it turns out that is more complicated than cherry picking sensational ideas from headlines.
You seem pretty upset, perhaps you should take a deep breath and have a fosters. Its not worth having a stroke over a debate. I mean look at me, the John Wayne american cool headed, not pounding my chest and trying to act like a big scary man. Whats the world coming to.
And for the record, i did not call Aussies pu$$ys. I was referring to someone so afraid and paranoid of america they wouldn't come here .
the new testament tells us stories about miracles, people speaking in different languages by the holy spirit, jesus appearing to many of his disciples.
but, why this was only a first century phenomenom???.
here some reasoning: http://godisimaginary.com/i15.htm.
anyone in the usa following this morning's shooting "on-air" live tv will know what i'm talking about.
bryce williams (not real name, but on-air name) shot and killed 2 people on live television this morning in roanoke, va. he was wearing a go-pro camera, and uploaded his first-person video onto his social media accounts.
i've seen his twitter feed (before it was taken down), and not very far down he mentions being raised a jw.
Ok, so you've identified a root cause. According to your 'root cause analysis,' it's revenge (on steroids) which motivates killers like Dylan and Erick of Columbine Infamy.Wrong. I am saying the INFAMY motivates them. It’s not revenge, its revenge on a stage. But beyond that I am saying things changed with them. They set a new standard that each wacko has been trying to achieve since.
Now let's say, that as someone in the aviation field, I wanted to find a root cause as to why planes crash. By applying similar logic as you have, I deduce that gravity is to blame. Therefore, I ask the manufacturers to design an anti-gravity device. Then, I'll see about getting ejection seats installed in all passenger seats. You see where I'm going with this?I don’t because it makes no sense. A more intelligent analogy would be why someone would intentionally crash a plane. I’m not analyzing why or how a bullet kills someone when it hits them. Sorry this nonsense is completely lost on me.
Now, back to Dylan and Erick. Their motivation was revenge. On steroids, as you say. Fine. Now, what solution do you propose?Did I say I had a solution? Nope. I didn’t . If this phenomenon has transcended simply a gun control problem, does it make sense for us to put blinders on to all other factors? And just guns guns guns it was guns that caused this. That’s a Band-Aid.
Now that you've identified a cause. Do you want to develop a device that flies around and measures peoples' 'motivation for revenge?' Should we come up with 'thought police' as in "1984." Hmmm, a bit impractical as I see it.Your fallacious reasoning suggests I implied anything like this. When I did not, these are your ideas my friend. Don’t put things out there like this, this kind of stuff doesn’t go over well here.
You want to blame sensationalist media? Then I assume you're ok with trashing the First Amendment.Again dude, the fallacies. You are very good at using the straw man fallacy over and over. You must have been a fantastic witness. Elder? Pioneer maybe? You are in effect saying that because I think the United States Media sensationalizes stories involving murder and fear and suffering, that I disagree with the first amendment. I never said “do away with the media” or “do away with the first amendment”. I personally ignore sensational media sources. And most news all together. That has nothing to do with you just stated.
Prior to this massacre, there had been others, though not as large. Since the buyback program, there have been no such massacres at all, in Aussie land since '96. NONE. Now, keep in mind, that there have likely been people there, who were 'motivated by revenge on steroids.' But it's a but hard to act out these motivations if you have no, or at least restricted access to the tools that make this possible. And please, spare us the nonsense about how..."they can use a machete." Or, " they can get a can of gasoline and start a fire." Yes, there have been very isolated incidents like this here and there, but you can't even BEGIN to equate that with the chronic mass shooting problem as it exists in the US.America has a ‘gun’ psychology, jihadists have a 'tie a bomb to your ass psychology'. Again none of what you are saying has to do with my position that there is a psychology to commit sensationalized spree shootings in a America. You are still talking about gun laws and patting Australia on the back. You are all very knowledgeable of the efficient killing capability of a firearm, but if fatality numbers were all these folks cared about, they would go the Timothy McVey route, shit he killed 168 people and injured like 600 others without firing a shot, he also didn’t go shoot himself. Motive. The spree shooting is about more than death.
A) Imitate the Australian example. Which is heavy restriction to gun access. Part of the reason this has worked in Australia is geography. It's more difficult to smuggle illegal weapons onto an island. Hence, US borders would need some major beefing up.These solutions still are too basic. EVERYONE wants to cherry pick what they think it is. But they miss the point. One of the best articles I have read that describes what I am getting and, and you don’t seem to understand is this.
or
B) Follow the Swiss example. Which is an expansion of regulation, over not just guns, but ammo as well. Perhaps expand the idea of National Guard, or IRR (ready reserves) to allow for assault weapons to be kept at home, but with strict rules on training, procedures, and weapon securing. Also include strict penalties for non-compmiance. So, your kid gets hold of your weapon, and shoots up his school, then your irresponsible ass is going to Leavenworth for a looong time.
They’re not “crazy.” They don’t just “snap.” Most of them spend months or years planning their massacres. Elliot Rodger had apparently been planning his shooting for over a year. You don’t just show up with a 140-page manifesto and a large stockpile of weapons one day. You work at it for a long time. And you plan not only the violence, but the presentation for the audience, the performance — what they will see from you, what they will hear from you, the reasons why, the message. It’s all very conscious and deliberate.
And it works. Their killing sprees are specifically targeted to generate the most fear and uncertainty from the public, because the more fear and uncertainty they generate, the more attention they get. They then use all of the attention as a platform to promote themselves or whatever complaints they may have against society. It’s the Columbine formula. It works. And as Eric Harris pointed out in his journal, it’s not about the guns. It’s about the television. The films. The fame. The revolution.new here but looking forward to joining in some of the discussions with you all.. a small bit about me: i'm shane.
was raised as a jw in the uk by my mum (single parent family) from about 2 years of age.
got baptised at 15 for all the wrong reasons.
so i had a discussion with my mother about this, and she claims that because of this that: "we are surely living in the last days right now" while i must admit myself that the situation seem chaotic, i don't want to believe that it is the last days.
so question is, how do i face an opinion like that?
anyone in the usa following this morning's shooting "on-air" live tv will know what i'm talking about.
bryce williams (not real name, but on-air name) shot and killed 2 people on live television this morning in roanoke, va. he was wearing a go-pro camera, and uploaded his first-person video onto his social media accounts.
i've seen his twitter feed (before it was taken down), and not very far down he mentions being raised a jw.
As far as 'celebrity maniacs,' I'm afraid I don't know what you're talking about. I think that, you might be referring to well-known people who don't share your views. But, I'm not sure.
What I am talking about is the uniquely american "shoot your way to infamy"
You see, the psychology of gun ownership and even typical gun violence is very different. How so?
Lets take this Vester mess. Lets say he cracks, wants revenge, and has a gun. He waits outside the station, these two walk out, he gets his "revenge" they are dead. The story floods local headlines and then maybe , MAYBE, gets a small footnote reference on national news feeds, but most likely not. No this is whats happened. Vester Flanagan was delusional, for what sees to be most his life. He was a narcissist, paranoid, angry, if he thinks the desert god was talking to him, he most likely has some schizophrenia. So what did he do?
Well he admired those who have become infamous american sociopath monsters. Household names, they insight fear and terror. They achieved "evil" celebrity status. Again I think you guys are way simplifying this that this was just some asshole that wanted revenge, again thats only a piece. This coward wanted fame. His revenge came with a desire to be known, to be a monster to achieve infamy.
Again this problem is uniquely american. Yea sure we have more guns than other places, the makes it EASIER to find one I am sure. How many countries have no guns at all? There are guns that can be got, especially illegally. Still it remains these stomach turning shooting stories remain an american problem. I have no problem associating gun violence in america with volume of guns. But these theatrical attention grabbing killings, are a deeper issue america has.
Think about Colombine, they had so sadistically planned it out, Erick and Dylan became immortal which is what they wanted. The media helped for sure. These assholes were Deified by the media, not for good but evil, but immortalized none the less. The day before Colombine they were nobodies, the day after they were all anyone was talking about. Vester Flanagan. He WAS a nobody, now we know his name, we know his life story, and we saw the monster he was capable of being.
Again these attention seeking mass murders are really an american phenomenon and the stakes get higher and higher, each one idolizes the last and tries to up the anti on savagery or shock value. In Vesters case, live TV, also he filmed it and streamed it. The church shooting, newton ct if you go back through you see these things get more and more twisted because someone wants to be the next Erick and Dylan. The pattern has been set with the gun, and yes it is an efficient killing tool. But its become a part of the theatrics, especially in the media.
So you change gun laws, ok, great. It will probably contribute to the already declining numbers of gun related crime in America that no one likes to acknowledge. Thats great. Here is a good question thought, is it going to stop the next person that wants to be the next Erick and Dylan? I highly doubt that, because their motive is not revenge, its revenge on steroids. They are determined to become and immortal monster even if they have to die doing it. Its sick. This problem is next level.
The husband of the surviving woman who was being interviewed at the time said the following about it:
Mr Gardner told Fox News that he doesn't think the gun was the issue in the attack against his wife.
'He was bound and determined to try to make a name for himself on live TV because he failed at it so many times,' Mr Gardner said. 'So no, I don’t blame the gun, I blame the guy that was holding the gun.'
Mr Gardner says if he was barred from getting a gun, Flanagan could have killed with a knife or machete.
Gun violence in America is a problem, these "Infamy" shootings, are a more complex problem.
I think the discussion about gun violence is a good one, but when newton Ct, or something like this happens, to use it as the reason WHY we need more controls, is stepping over bigger issues to get to the easy one.
There are 320 millions people in America, there is nearly 300 million guns. What do you believe is going to happen to all of those if a new law is passed? They will just magically disappear? unfortunately those are here probably to stay. An outright complete ban on guns would not stop someone bent on destruction from finding one, it may make it more difficult, but they are going to find a way.
according to the newest watchtower:.
jehovah communicated with adam in the garden of eden, using human language.
god likely did so in an ancient form of hebrew.
No offense to my modern Hebrew speakers... but for me it is not the prettiest language. Arabic either.
I think we should all speak Italian when we get to the paradise petting zoo