i just had the question below reported by jws and removed for "misuse of question format" .. .
it received a bunch of outraged reponses from people critical of the jws and i'm sure shocked.
a few jws also .. .
What is really weird is that the WT objection to this practice (which I've never heard of either) is that it encourages children to become masturbators later on, NOT that it is child sexual abuse!
So, masturbation (a natural human act) is a worse offence in the WT eyes than child sexual abuse? No wonder they have a pedophilia problem that they have failed to address properly.
michael dunn pulled into a convenience store parking lot next to a suv full of teenagers who were playing loud music.
he asked the teens to turn down the music, it is uncertain what words were exchanged at that point.
michael dunn then shot 4 times into the driver's side of the suv.
If you want to stop violence ARM everyone. Its extremly hard to be an A$$ when you could die from it.
Apparently not.
It's just like the wild, wild west - lawless. I hope Dunn gets due punishment through the "justice" system.
the poor thing is 86 and was told by a friend with "the internet" that the catholic church is being attacked by the un!
the tribulation is at hand.
well, if you consider a report on molestation coverups the end of religion, watch out wt, they are coming for you next.
.. .........................some people are truly in need..some are not... a man passing by on his 10 speed bike,asked me for $2.00 for a cup of coffee... .................................................."uhhh,no"... ............another asked me for spare change outside a super market... ......................................i said i didn`t have any... ...................so he say`s "how about a credit card?!"......lol!!...
.. ....................what do you do,when people ask you for spare change?...
..... .. ..........................................whats the most outrageous thing... ......................................you`ve been asked forby a stranger?...
I occasionally part with a random fiver - I feel good, they feel good and it's better if I don't over-analyze it.
it's time for the next chapter in my life.
on friday, jan. 31, i will be 67 years old.. the contract job i was working ended in july, 2013. it was a plus money wise for my pension and social security.
i worked for an engineering firm at the same company that i was with for 30 years.. thankfully i never listened to the wtbts about quiting my job to pioneer or other bs stuff.
Happy Dad,
Best wishes to you for a happy 'second act'. You've earned it.
greetings, friends:.
wishing you well today.
below is a story that came to mind as i lay awake, contemplating the new day.
Nicely put, CoCo. Would love to see this expanded into a short story. You are so talented.
fine.
holy spirit appointed overseers to shepherd?
6:1, 2; jude 22) are these not good reasons for being obedient to those who are taking the lead?read hebrews 13:17.. .
"Where men are men, women are scarce, and the sheep are nervous."
there's an interesting medicolegal issue arising out of tx, a pregnant women who suffered a pulmonary embolism in november and died (when she was 14 weeks pregnant).. however, the body has been kept on life-support all this time (against her and her husband's wishes), due to an ambiguous tx state law (tex hs.
code ann.
166.049) which actually blocks the ability of the patient and family to decide:.
Your statement infers that the fetus's viability factors into this in some manner.
It seems that the law was open to interpretation - since November 28 the hospital has been complying with what they thought the law said. Maybe I am a bit cynical, but is it not possible that the judge was influenced in his decision by the knowledge that the fetus was not just inviable, but damaged?
there's an interesting medicolegal issue arising out of tx, a pregnant women who suffered a pulmonary embolism in november and died (when she was 14 weeks pregnant).. however, the body has been kept on life-support all this time (against her and her husband's wishes), due to an ambiguous tx state law (tex hs.
code ann.
166.049) which actually blocks the ability of the patient and family to decide:.
He did not say the statute didn't apply because she was deadn AND the fetus was not viable.
He didn't have to.
there's an interesting medicolegal issue arising out of tx, a pregnant women who suffered a pulmonary embolism in november and died (when she was 14 weeks pregnant).. however, the body has been kept on life-support all this time (against her and her husband's wishes), due to an ambiguous tx state law (tex hs.
code ann.
166.049) which actually blocks the ability of the patient and family to decide:.
A sane conclusion.
But it is still disturbing to think that, if the fetus had been considered "viable," this nightmare might still be going on.
