in regards to lady liberty the hebrew scriptures are very old 3000-3500( i think) and the new testament being just under 2000 years old. they have compared the bible of our day with the dead sea scrolls ( parchment thay found in a cave) and the majority is vertially unchanged, thought there was a fer gramatical errors which after such a long amount of time is extremely good considering. this was in a jw magazine. though in the end it comes down to which religion is telling the truth, the bible says you will recognise it by its fruits, at the moment im slightly in favor of jw's but unlike some ignorant people, who will believe one side and not hear anything of the other, and will not listen to facts ( eg those who still believe the earth is flat, what a bunch of dicks) i dont intend on making my mindup until i am 100% sure, what i am sure of is that there can only be one.
maxwell66
JoinedPosts by maxwell66
-
90
i have a question
by brandon_the many inwould the passage from new world translation be a miss print....because in the holy bible the word is god......so if god is not capitalized..then what god is the book referring to...because there is only one father and one living god witch is jesus...... .
please help me , because this has been puzzling me...... .
new world translation of the holy scriptures new world translation of the holy scriptures .
-
-
-
90
i have a question
by brandon_the many inwould the passage from new world translation be a miss print....because in the holy bible the word is god......so if god is not capitalized..then what god is the book referring to...because there is only one father and one living god witch is jesus...... .
please help me , because this has been puzzling me...... .
new world translation of the holy scriptures new world translation of the holy scriptures .
-
-
maxwell66
in regards to daystar about changing their doctrine to not support the trinty doctrine. the trintey doctrine was only established about 300-400Ad (correct me if im wrong) after emperor constanine established it as the religion for the roman empire. and correct me if im wrong, the jews both before and after christ held the belief in only ONE god. god jesus and the holy spirit ( which i might add has never said a word) are the same being that would mean that the old testament was i lie and the bible states that god cannot lie. lets not forget the voice that came down from heaven and said "this is my son" and the fact that jesus constantly prayed to god ( bit pointless if he prayed to hinself aye), another question, who resurected him when he died, why would saten even bother trying to tempt him if he was the eternal father jehovah god. another question to ask is why modern bibles now leave gods name out. perhaps its because religious leaders dont want the name used in vain, then why would it appear in the hebrew texts alone over 6500 times??? another question, where does it say that there needs to be a pope? christ is the head, why does there need to be a human head, isralites had the same problem. jehovah was there king, but they wanted someone they could see. religions today are promoting wars, (pope has his two cents worth) when jesus said "for all thosewhotake the sord will perish by the sword" 26,53Matt. The reason Jw's are politically nutural is because jesus said he was no part of this world as should you be (john 17:16) so what do catholc's do, they make there own country (way to get around it) unfortunately most of christanitys doctrins have been developed partly by the popes religion (catholics?) so what the jehovahs witnesses are doing is good, they are rethinking common belies, as the roman empire was more of you have to believe this which is not what the bible says. this is one of the fundemental reasons why god is taking so long to act, when adam sined, humans integratery came into question, whether someone would stay loyal to god because they loved him or because they loved the benefits, as was later demonstrated in job, thats one reason the jw explain for the long absence of god enforcement, timen need to pass so as many people as possible can surrive the end of times. all these people are dissing the Jw's, how many other religions soel purpose is to devote their time to warn people ( also mormans) like someone warning people of a coming storm, they dont use the old peer pressure tatic of passing around the collection hat ( cant look stingy to the person sitting next to you), you can give a donation but the majority is funded by the jw's themselves and even then the times i have been they have never asked, its usually on a side wall, you dont have to give a portion of your salary, you dont have to give any at all, the information is there for the benifet of all, remember the true religion at the ended of times 'will be despised on the account of my name', will be prosecuted against, which is still happening to Jws in countrys where mandatory millatory service is required, they were prevented from there precheing during ww2 ( or wwi one of them) which was predicted in daniel dont havea bible with me but can post later. anyway wat bad are they doing, why dont people like them, is it because they come nocking on door with good intentions, or that they wont protest, fight in wars, salute a flag ( which is a form of idolatory, pride nationalism that there country is best and that god favours them more), gambel, drink, generally dos stuff that causes unrest, how many times do you see them on the news?