Don't you know? 'Good magic' is OK in Jehovah's Witness Land!
i was perusing the internet not long ago and came upon this series of videos by a guy calling himself xendrius.
it declares that many of today's best magicians are in league with the devil.
his claims are based on his observation that the tricks would be impossible to do unless the magicians had made unholy pacts with the devil.. so what's the take of the wtbts?
Don't you know? 'Good magic' is OK in Jehovah's Witness Land!
witnesses hate college education, and why would you need one when you have our "spiritual food" the watchtower answering science questions.. watchtower 1973 july 15 p.7 questions from readers.. "when did dinosaurs go extinct?
-they may have disappeared during the flood of noahs day.
not all of them were of gigantic size.
someone at bethel dinning room was hogging all the bread rolls!!!
would a brother on the writting dep.
dare vent his frustration thru the spiritual food our watchtower???
"For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God." 1 Peter 4:17 KJV.
yearbook 1967 p.105 chad africa- "..a large crowd were following a man with a talking serpent.
the serpent gave greetings and spoke in foriegn tongues.
a brother went to the house and as soon as he entered the serpent went silent.
Talking snake, 'my ass'!
Why are humans so gullible? Especially religious minded people?
i'm leaving.... leaving this video here since issues have been far too polarizing lately!.
lighten up, take a deep breath, and have a laugh.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sp4nmojcfd4.
Just for you, talesin. I couldn't resist.............Calicos are the BEST!
i'm leaving.... leaving this video here since issues have been far too polarizing lately!.
lighten up, take a deep breath, and have a laugh.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sp4nmojcfd4.
Thanks Cappy! You made my day and my cats day too!!
stumbled upon www.towerwatch.com.
a ministry of misery.
depression.
I wore 'rimless' wire framed glasses when I was a Bethelite in the 70's , just like Papa Knorr!
from what i was told, we don't celebrate birthdays because the only two times it is mentioned in the bible, bad things happened.
so if the wt wants to set standards by the "two bad things" rule, then why do they use the name bethel?
i've read two instances in the bible where bad things happened there.
Bethel and the deplorable state of the current Governing Body(tm) was prophesied in Amos 4:4 - "GO TO BETHEL AND SIN". That is my version of 'new light'. If they can take scriptures out of context and make 'shit' up, than so can I.!
http://www.recordonline.com/article/20151214/news/151219671.
battle over contamination at watchtower site in warwick.
by hema easley .
3.) They didn't know about the pollution. This means, in essence, they are going to go into court and say "we're idiots and these bad people took advantage of us." This option might be the most entertaining.- JeffT
This is what my mind conjured up when I read JeffT's post:
WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA...........................A BAD KITTY JUST SHIT IN MY SANDBOX!!!!!! SOMEONE BETTER DO SOMETHING RIGHT AWAY!!!!!!!!
http://www.recordonline.com/article/20151214/news/151219671.
battle over contamination at watchtower site in warwick.
by hema easley .
"The title search should have revealed the previous owners and the nature of their business, which should have been a red flag for environmental issues." - JeffT
Who did the title search? A home schooled newboy Bethelite? The Watchtower lawyers can't be that stupid or are they? At the slightest hint of possible pollution, Watchtower should have reconsidered their options for purchase. At the very least, they should have purchased some time of 'pollution insurance' or required the seller to purchase the insurance to cover any unforeseen difficulties with the property. It seems that the Governing Body(tm) and their team of helpers and legal experts operate from a very naïve and childlike world view.
"Pollution insurance can be a valuable risk management tool to limit potential environmental liability. It can supplement the traditional methods of allocating risk in a real estate transaction, including proper due diligence , representations and warranties, indemnifications, placing funds in escrow and reducing the purchase price. .... the parties my choose to purchase pollution insurance to transfer risk of certain liabilities to an independent third party insurer."-Gregg A. Nathanson, ESQ.
Maybe I am way off base . Are their any lawyers or commercial real estate experts posting here that can comment on this?