no
deddaisy
JoinedPosts by deddaisy
-
57
Should the boyfriend sleep over??
by Beck_Melbourne injust a question to you parents out there.
i've never had teenagers before, so i'm kinda new at this.
my eldest daughter is 17 this month...and we have discussed the 'pill'.
-
-
59
WOMAN SUES CHURCH; STORM IN THE HALL/Toronto Sun
by morrisamb inseptember 1, 2002 www.torontosun.com reporter's email: [email protected] woman sues churchclaims jehovah's witnesses hid sex abuse.
by brodie fenlon -- toronto sun.
a new brunswick woman claims two jehovah's witness elders and the canadian church hid the sexual abuse she says she suffered at the hands of her father.
-
deddaisy
I left the organization on my own years ago only because I do not agree with organized religion.
honestly, I don't understand why you joined an "organized" religion if you don't "agree" with organized religion ? Or did an "unorganized" religion come calling and convince you that "organized" religion was nonsense after you were a JW ?
-
26
"Biting The Helping Hand..."
by silentlambs in"the elders feel that she is basically biting the helping hand"
the quote above is from a recent news article regarding child rape and jehovah's witnesses.
i find it a stunning confirmation of exactly how abuse survivors are treated within the jehovahs witnesses community.
-
deddaisy
JWs worship the organization, for it is their god above all goodness or decency ...---Amazing
unfortunately, this seems to be the bottom line. For the first time in my life, I actually believe that I am more disgusted with my family for being JWs than they are with me for not being a JW.....
-
59
WOMAN SUES CHURCH; STORM IN THE HALL/Toronto Sun
by morrisamb inseptember 1, 2002 www.torontosun.com reporter's email: [email protected] woman sues churchclaims jehovah's witnesses hid sex abuse.
by brodie fenlon -- toronto sun.
a new brunswick woman claims two jehovah's witness elders and the canadian church hid the sexual abuse she says she suffered at the hands of her father.
-
deddaisy
Church spokesman Clive Thomas said that while the church has sympathy for her case, the lawsuit is misdirected.
well clive, sweetie, doesn't sound much like she's a person who's dependent on your sympathy, and unfortunately for you, only the judge is able to decide if the lawsuit is misdirected....
all the wt lawyers and wt men, couldn't put wt back together again.........
what the hell....I edited grammar, ok ?
Edited by - deddaisy on 4 September 2002 1:17:9
-
25
Barbara Anderson article - outstanding!
by waiting inmikepence posted this article over at bboy's forum and it's well worth bringing over here.
if i offend anyone - it's not my intention.
it is my intention to continue with helping to shed new light on this hideous crime.
-
deddaisy
one can't help but wonder how the Witnesses that really know Barb and Joe can just go silently along with the obvious injustice of their disfellowshippings.
Thanks Waiting !
-
24
I miss my mom
by flower indont know why but lately i do.
i feel so bad that i have been so mean to her lately.
but ever since i found out the real deal about the organization i havent been able to even hear her voice without being feeling angry at her.
-
deddaisy
flower, I miss my mom to the point of being tragic. give your mom a big hug when you see her. she may need a hug from you too, and we have no guarantees when we'll have the chance again.
-
19
DF story in Detroit Newspaper on Shirley Jackson
by blondie inhttp://www.detnews.com/2002/religion/0208/30/d05w-574630.htm
the detroit news
'disfellowshipped' jehovah's witnesses speak out against practice.
-
deddaisy
Shirley is really paying a price for ever giving this cult the time of day. so she's shunned by her own kids, for what, saying she didn't feel God's presence in the hall? while that pervert that molested children, whatever his name is, is in good standing in prison. perfect WTS logic.
-
28
JW Refuses Blood. JW Dies. JW's Sue.
by Mister 8iggs ini guess the family needs the money so that they can quit their jobs and pioneer.
http://www.canada.com/halifax/news/story.asp?id={49cb73c1-27a2-48f8-a3fb-6127fcc41a9e}.
family of jehovah's witness gives up lawsuit against doctors over her death.
-
deddaisy
these stories make me sick to my stomach. In the Hobbs case, it's heartbreaking that three children will grow up without their mother, because of an idiotic doctrine fed to their parents by an idiotic organization. It appears by the husband's comments that he may have submitted to blood if it came down to his wife living or dying:
"It was sometime after my arrival that I was asked ... about giving Daphne blood and I told him I would not go against her
wishes or religious convictions," the affidavit says."Nobody told me that even if blood had been given at that time, whether it would make a difference. I was simply told that it
was unlikely she would survive."He will live with this the rest of his life. Negligence or no negligence, blood would have most likely saved her life.
-
28
JW Refuses Blood. JW Dies. JW's Sue.
by Mister 8iggs ini guess the family needs the money so that they can quit their jobs and pioneer.
http://www.canada.com/halifax/news/story.asp?id={49cb73c1-27a2-48f8-a3fb-6127fcc41a9e}.
family of jehovah's witness gives up lawsuit against doctors over her death.
-
deddaisy
The Vancouver Sun
February 3, 2001 Saturday FINAL EDITION
HEADLINE: Patient who refused blood has right to sue: Court rules man can sue the hospital where his Jehovah's Witness
wife diedBYLINE: Neal Hall
A Jehovah's Witness who signed a release form refusing any blood transfusions before she died during a routine operation
did not sign away her right to sue for medical negligence, a B.C. Supreme Court judge ruled Friday.Daphne Hobbs underwent a hysterectomy at Chilliwack General Hospital on April 15, 1996. The operation was expected to
take up to two hours and result in the loss of about 200 millilitres of blood.Instead, there was unexpected and substantial bleeding during the operation. The 36-year-old mother of three died at 1 a.m.the next day after losing all her circulating blood, about 4,000 ml. Her husband, Ernest Hobbs, filed a lawsuit in 1998, claiming
negligence against the hospital and a number of doctors. A number of defendants were struck from the case, which is
proceedings against Dr. John Robertson, the obstetrician who performed the operation, and Dr. A.A. Suleman, the anesthetist.
Ernest Hobbs filed the lawsuit on behalf of his children Kaleb, 6, Travis, 10 and Jada, 12.A trial was set for last Dec. 4 but a legal issue that had to be sorted out first was whether the release form, specifying that
Daphne Hobbs refused to accept blood or blood products for religious reasons, absolved the doctors of liability.Justice Allen Melvin, in a 21-page written judgment, decided it did not. "In my opinion, the form she signed does not ...
amount to a voluntary assumption of risk of surgeons' negligence by Mrs. Hobbs," the judge concluded."A contrary conclusion could result in patients (who do not sign releases) receiving a higher standard of care than those who
do so."As a result of the decision, the matter will now proceed to trial or possibly an out-of-court settlement, said lawyer Lou Zivot,
who is acting for Ernest Hobbs, 46."With this hurdle out of the way, I would hope we could proceed to talking about settlement," Zivot said.
"This is quite a novel point," he said of the legal issue.
According to court documents, the doctors deny their care of the patient was negligent. Robertson's statement of defence says
he "exercised reasonable care, skill and diligence."Robertson concluded the death "could have been prevented if this lady could have received blood and coagulation products."
An affidavit filed by Ernest Hobbs states he was called to the hospital and was advised there had been some bleeding.
"It was sometime after my arrival that I was asked ... about giving Daphne blood and I told him I would not go against her
wishes or religious convictions," the affidavit says."Nobody told me that even if blood had been given at that time, whether it would make a difference. I was simply told that it
was unlikely she would survive."An affidavit by Dr. Mark Hobbs, a Montreal obstetrician and gynecologist retained by Hobbs's lawyer, said Robertson's
operative report on the surgery was inadequate because "it does not detail all the events that must have occurred during this
four-hour operation."Boyd, who noted he had treated numerous Jehovah's Witness patients, wrote that it appeared Daphne Hobbs had been given
massive amounts of crystalloids that had "washed out" all the clotting factors in her blood so it could not coagulate.Boyd said Hobbs suffered a pelvic hemorrhage, which is hard to see during vaginal surgery. He suggested Robertson "should
have opened the abdomen and controlled the bleeding" rather than continuing the operation vaginally.Robertson's operation report stated "the site of the bleeding could not be easily ascertained."
Daphne Hobbs had sought the operation to solve a bleeding problem. She told her husband it was low risk. Previously, she
had attended hospital for four medical procedures, including a cesarean section, and each time had signed a release form
refusing to permit blood transfusions.The operation record shows the surgery commenced at 12:18 p.m. and finished at 4:35 p.m.
Initially, there was one intravenous line connected to Hobbs but a second line was connected at 1:45, when she was given 10
per cent dextran, a blood substitute. -
20
can't understand why people can't see .
by Curyus ini don't understand why people can't see the truth when it's right there in the bible in black & white.
you can't change it to fit your personal lifestyle or modify it by only applying what intrest or benefits you.
the wt organization has its place just like all the other secular laws have theres to protect & guide us.
-
deddaisy
you:
1) believe that Armageddon will come before you get old, or
2) are young and can't comprehend getting old, or
3) all of the above.
get out while your life is ahead of you, instead of behind you............