Could a man be DFd for wearing a kilt to the meetings? What if he took a bagpipe along with him? lol
joe_black
JoinedPosts by joe_black
-
18
Can a Woman be DFd for wearing a pantsuit to meetings?
by LovesDubs inim wondering if they are still so tight assed in the organization as to make issue with such matters that they would df a woman who preferred to wear pants to dresses but still came to the hall.
do you think they wouldnt allow her to enter after awhile?
i wore a skort once and gave a talk back in like, 1986 and was soundly reprimanded for wearing apparel that was "masculine and improper for sisters to be wearing".
-
40
Expect big things to happen tomorrow
by startingover inthat's right, may 1 and after should see momentous changes!.
that because it's.
national day of prayer!.
-
joe_black
How about we all pray for $1 per gallon gasoline, lets see if the prayer granter lowers the price for us. What do you think?
-
23
Why all the changes?????
by seek2find inin my life time as a witness, there have been many changes and there are still more to come.
like the "generation" change in the feb study edition of the wt.
my question is this.
-
joe_black
We should always remember first and foremost the WTBS is a $$making corporation. Corporations need new products and ideas to keep the customer happy and the feeding frenzy continues, unfortunatley most of us used to "buy" from this conglomerate. And more unfortunately some of us still have loved ones who are still buying the crap.
-
9
Male Cannabis plant identified as Tree of knowledge of good and bad
by Ronald inprobably the main and most agreeable effect of the ingestion of cannabis is it enables the mind to pursue thoughts along a theme.
the immagination is released from its circular bondage to pursue one thought after another along a stout central theme and recognizing related ideas going off along the way just like branches along a limb.
this enhancement of mental capacity is very satisfying and can be enthrawling.
-
joe_black
Spoken like a true connoisseur as one who enjoys with discrimination and appreciation of subtleties.
-
18
Who got the biggest.....
by Crumpet insnowfall this morning?
we had two inches in surrey which put paid to all the trains, sent lorries jacknifing across the m25 and made my journey to work 2.5 hours.
anyone beat my two inches?.
-
joe_black
The average "5.5 inches" of the "white" stuff was reported, but on the "other" side of the tracks where I live, its about 8 inches last time we measured, lol.
-
24
January 14, 2007; the most bizarre comments I have ever heard at a Hall
by MinisterAmos inmost of you have already scoped out the wt lesson for yesterday that blondie provided, but i'm going to add to it a bit and share the audience comments for the meeting.. i'm also going to share some direct-from-the-gb "new-light" that was revealed by the speaker in his discussion.....ready?.
so the wife and i are on vacation yesterday and visit a congregation located in western fl or east al; floribama as the natives call it.. the speaker began by telling us that the "happy god" isn't really happy because of the state of the world.
i forgot to ask him where that fact is found in the bible.
-
joe_black
In the words of my friend from Mumbai it's all Booooolsheeeeeit!
-
75
Believer, Agnostic or Atheist?
by lfcviking ini am curious, what amount people on this board from their experiences of being a baptised & active jw and their subsequent exit from the jw org (for whatever reason or reasons) are now either agnostic, atheist or do some actually still believe in god?.
your honest answers please.. lfcv.
-
joe_black
I grew up around the religion and was never baptized(got out before taking "the dip" with all the other dips) lol...........I consider myself agnostic(a person who holds the view that any ultimate reality (as God) is unknown and probably unknowable; broadly : one who is not committed to believing in either the existence or the nonexistence of God or a god.
-
41
Do you still call it "the truth"?
by True North indo you find youself still calling it "the truth" even though you are an ex-jw?
for instance, in one posting i just read, the poster wrote "when i was in the truth..." .
not a big deal, perhaps, but really not such a good thing either as it's a habitual holdover from the program of mental conditioning we were subject to.
-
joe_black
Although it took a while to stop referring to it as "the truth, I finally stopped when I became "de-brainwashed". I now refer to it as "the religion". My JW mom and siblings cringe when I call it that, then you can see the sadness in their eyes when they silently reason in their minds thats all it is, just a religion.
-
21
Being materialistic, as a disfellowshipping reason.
by free2beme inmy sister and i, are my mothers only two children.
we were both witnesses at one point, i left ten year ago and my sister left in 2005. my mother remains as the only witness left in my immediate family.
while my sister and i make good money, with our careers and duel income in marriage, we don't talk about it much.
-
joe_black
I also knew of several situations where rich, materialistic JW's would donate substantial amounts in the box monthly which in turn would make the elders turn a blind eye on them and their childrens offenses. Most "common" poorer JW's and their children would be DF'd or reproved for some of the things that the rich wouldn't even be counseled on. So in my observation making tons of $$$$ isn't a sin to the "society" UNLESS you're NOT giving them any.
-
19
Most controversial?
by joe_black ini know that most of what the wbts says and does is viewed by many of us as hogwash, but what do you think was the most controversial thing that happened or was said by the watchtower in 2006?...............i mean something so obviously off the wall or sinister that it would make even the most hardcore jw pause and say, "hey, what the f*ck?!!
"
-
joe_black
Regarding the "new and improved?" blood issue, I asked my (hardcore, society can't be wrong about anything)JW mother what she thought about it. Her reply was "they didn't change anything". I told her she needed to read her WT's thoroughly. She still didn't believe that they had changed anything(don't know if she ever actually read that issue). I asked her hypothetically "what if they began to tell you that you could now receive a blood transfusion without being marked or DF'd?" Her reply was "then and only then would I start doubting that it was the "truth". It got me to thinking that many JW's base their whole faith on this blood doctrine rather on the love of Christ......and btw Happy New Year to Everyone!