Thanks I crack myself up.
Posts by 2050
-
2
New Light
by 2050 in[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:worddocument> <w:view>normal</w:view> <w:zoom>0</w:zoom> <w:punctuationkerning /> <w:validateagainstschemas /> <w:saveifxmlinvalid>false</w:saveifxmlinvalid> <w:ignoremixedcontent>false</w:ignoremixedcontent> <w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext>false</w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext> <w:compatibility> <w:breakwrappedtables /> <w:snaptogridincell /> <w:wraptextwithpunct /> <w:useasianbreakrules /> <w:dontgrowautofit /> </w:compatibility> <w:browserlevel>microsoftinternetexplorer4</w:browserlevel> </w:worddocument> </xml><!
[endif][if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:latentstyles deflockedstate="false" latentstylecount="156"> </w:latentstyles> </xml><!
[endif][if gte mso 10]> <style> /* style definitions */ table.msonormaltable {mso-style-name:"table normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"times new roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif].
-
2
New Light
by 2050 in[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:worddocument> <w:view>normal</w:view> <w:zoom>0</w:zoom> <w:punctuationkerning /> <w:validateagainstschemas /> <w:saveifxmlinvalid>false</w:saveifxmlinvalid> <w:ignoremixedcontent>false</w:ignoremixedcontent> <w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext>false</w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext> <w:compatibility> <w:breakwrappedtables /> <w:snaptogridincell /> <w:wraptextwithpunct /> <w:useasianbreakrules /> <w:dontgrowautofit /> </w:compatibility> <w:browserlevel>microsoftinternetexplorer4</w:browserlevel> </w:worddocument> </xml><!
[endif][if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:latentstyles deflockedstate="false" latentstylecount="156"> </w:latentstyles> </xml><!
[endif][if gte mso 10]> <style> /* style definitions */ table.msonormaltable {mso-style-name:"table normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"times new roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif].
-
2050
Witness spiritual food seems to go bad due to sitting in the light (new light), it seems to get brighter and make the food go off.
-
40
What is the most damning scripture in the Bible?
by viva infor many years, i had serious issues with alot of scriptures.
the creation account, the flood, jonah in the whale, etc.
scriptures that are scientifically falsifiable.
-
2050
He's saying don't sin against the Holy spirit, it's bad mmkay?
Anyway, here are some damning scriptures.
Genesis 3:24
After he drove the man out, he placed on the east side of the Garden of Eden cherubim and a flaming sword flashing back and forth to guard the way to the tree of life. (God invented the sword?)Ecclesiastes 1:5
The sun rises and the sun sets, and hurries back to where it rises. (Sun goes around the Earf) -
129
Why I am an atheist
by Awakened at Gilead insomeone (a born-again exjw) on youtube asked me why i was an atheist... i crafted a brief response... it follows:.
1. religious reason: there is no proof for god outside of the bible.
once i dropped my belief in the bible, the judeo-christian concept of god fell apart like a house of cards.
-
2050
Jehovah's Witnesses don't like it.
-
129
Why I am an atheist
by Awakened at Gilead insomeone (a born-again exjw) on youtube asked me why i was an atheist... i crafted a brief response... it follows:.
1. religious reason: there is no proof for god outside of the bible.
once i dropped my belief in the bible, the judeo-christian concept of god fell apart like a house of cards.
-
2050
Naturalism = What is real and can be tested.
Creationism = Presuppositions based on ancient mythology.Naturalism = Examine the real world and then come to a conclusion.
Creationism = Come to a conclusion and then force everything to support it.Naturalist presupposition = Evidence can tell us what happened.
Creationist presupposition = God did it.Naturalism does not rule out the existence of God. It could prove that God exists but so far it has led us in the opposite direction.
The secular version of history is in opposition to the Biblical version because one is based on mythology and the other is based on evidence.
-
129
Why I am an atheist
by Awakened at Gilead insomeone (a born-again exjw) on youtube asked me why i was an atheist... i crafted a brief response... it follows:.
1. religious reason: there is no proof for god outside of the bible.
once i dropped my belief in the bible, the judeo-christian concept of god fell apart like a house of cards.
-
2050
Got ya. Silly me!
-
129
Why I am an atheist
by Awakened at Gilead insomeone (a born-again exjw) on youtube asked me why i was an atheist... i crafted a brief response... it follows:.
1. religious reason: there is no proof for god outside of the bible.
once i dropped my belief in the bible, the judeo-christian concept of god fell apart like a house of cards.
-
2050
Those look like some really sharp teeth on that dinosaur. Had God turned the animals onto each other at that time?
-
11
How many CREATIONISTS don't believe that we orbit the sun?
by 2050 inthe ones that i have met (bible believers) all seem to accept the current scientific consensus that the earth orbits the sun.
i'm not saying that they all reject bible truth but i suspect that the majority do..
-
2050
JeffT, the sun certainly does appear to move. That is why they believed that it actually does move. Explaining all of these scriptures away as being poetic is not logical.
E.g. Ecclesiastes 1:5
The sun rises and the sun sets,
and hurries back to where it rises.Why does the sun "hurry back to where it rises"?
Notice also how Ecclesiastes 1:5 is part of a list of things that are described as literally moving. Verses 6 and 7 speak about the wind and the streams. They all return to their places to start again.
-
11
How many CREATIONISTS don't believe that we orbit the sun?
by 2050 inthe ones that i have met (bible believers) all seem to accept the current scientific consensus that the earth orbits the sun.
i'm not saying that they all reject bible truth but i suspect that the majority do..
-
2050
The ones that I have met (Bible believers) all seem to accept the current scientific consensus that the Earth orbits the sun. I'm not saying that they all reject Bible truth but I suspect that the majority do.
-
87
How many ATHEISTS don't believe that they came from FISH?
by hooberus inhow many atheists are there who don't believe that they came from fish ?.
the outspoken ones that i have come into contact with always seem to (when pressed anyway) advocate such a thing.
many of them surely even put something like it on their car, such as:.
-
2050
I am atheist (not because I choose to be but because after taking all factors into consideration that is the conclusion I come to)
I accept the fact that land life (including me) is descended from sea life (and sometimes the other way around e.g. dolphins)
I know it seems crazy but it makes perfect sense when one understands how extremely moldable life is. (no, it's not Jehovah doing the molding)
Seals seem to be confused. They don't know if they're comming or going.