AMAZING interactive card trick:-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbEei0I3kMQ
I have tried to explain it, but i cant.
MAGIC DOES EXIST!!!!
Paul
amazing interactive card trick:-.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbeei0i3kmq.
i have tried to explain it, but i cant.. magic does exist!!!!.
AMAZING interactive card trick:-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbEei0I3kMQ
I have tried to explain it, but i cant.
MAGIC DOES EXIST!!!!
Paul
i am sorry to hash and rehash this old topic, but i have a friend that has continually asked the wt's chronology of 607 and that historians do not agree with their thoughts on their selection of this date to "fit" their ideaolgies.
could someone give me information from credible historians that absolutely prove that 607 is impossible?
this person has looked up information and what they have found so far is that most websites or some persons on this site do not show conclusively that 607 is not credible.
On second thoughts, it looks as though i am going to take that last post back. Looking at the KISS approach it would seem that the WT quotations show that the baton has been passed along.
Paul
i am sorry to hash and rehash this old topic, but i have a friend that has continually asked the wt's chronology of 607 and that historians do not agree with their thoughts on their selection of this date to "fit" their ideaolgies.
could someone give me information from credible historians that absolutely prove that 607 is impossible?
this person has looked up information and what they have found so far is that most websites or some persons on this site do not show conclusively that 607 is not credible.
The thing about these approaches though is that the sources provided do not show one kings reign being passed from one to another. They show the individual reign of each king, but not passing the baton so to speak.
They show the kings reigns, mostly from a number of sources. But surely the WBTS will say that there must be a missing king.
How would you answer that?
Paul
this is funny!.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arf7ydwv8ho.
do you want to vote for robert mugabe?.
Very funny
Paul
the topic on assembly meals hot food at the dcs past...what was it like?
made me think of the days sat on the terraces at district conventions.
they were originally 4 day affairs but ended up just friday and the weekend (maybe they are just the weekend now?)..
Maine Road? Always been a bit of a dive if you ask me Now as for Molineaux, there's a ground we can talk about.
Paul
why not have them die that day as sinners as promised.. no kids, end of story.
.
Why did Jehovah allow Adam and Eve to have children?
I don't know....but what i want to know is did Adam and Eve have a belly button?
In fact maybe they had kids so they could see what a belly button looks like!
Paul
i have posted on here previously about my problems with alcoholism and the fact that i have attended aa meetings so i thought i would start a thread to post where i am at now.. i first attended at the beginning of january and went 7 weeks without a drink, i then had a weekend away and got drunk.
i then went another 7 weeks until my birthday (april 19).
since then i have felt that i could control my drinking within the confines of a local program.. this however hasn't really worked for me, i find that i do not really enjoy going out drinking and trying to pace myself.
Thanks jaguarbass, that post means so much.
Paul
i am sorry to hash and rehash this old topic, but i have a friend that has continually asked the wt's chronology of 607 and that historians do not agree with their thoughts on their selection of this date to "fit" their ideaolgies.
could someone give me information from credible historians that absolutely prove that 607 is impossible?
this person has looked up information and what they have found so far is that most websites or some persons on this site do not show conclusively that 607 is not credible.
This person has looked up information and what they have found so far is that most websites or some persons on this site do not show conclusively that 607 is NOT credible.
From my research so far you will not find conclusive proof for NB chronology. History is a funny thing, it gets changed to fit in with the writers view. One persons perspective is totally different to anothers. What you have with regard to 586/587BCE is the general standard view from secular scholars, who imo try hard to disprove the bible. But with all archeology there can be errors, discrepencies and down right lies.
I have been looking at astronomical texts, but even these have discrepencies, so what do you believe?
There is alot of information out there, it is worth a good look. For me, this is the one main thing that has kept me away from the society, so it's worth exploring.
Paul
i am sorry to hash and rehash this old topic, but i have a friend that has continually asked the wt's chronology of 607 and that historians do not agree with their thoughts on their selection of this date to "fit" their ideaolgies.
could someone give me information from credible historians that absolutely prove that 607 is impossible?
this person has looked up information and what they have found so far is that most websites or some persons on this site do not show conclusively that 607 is not credible.
But after all of this has been said the WBTS will always say that there must be a king or two missing. If you want to accept the bible at face value as a historical text, then the 70 year desolation will take you back to 607BCE. The problem is however, nowhere in history is there found to be a missing king.
Thousands of business tablets are available that list transactions as happening in the (x) year of the (y) kings reign, these are the only kings seen throughout archeology. The other issue that can be raised is that of dual kingship, so kings reign may clash totally throwing out the accepted line for NB chronology.
I have been researching this the last few days and must admit i am more confused than when i started.
I have come to the conclusion so far, that there could be a number of dates available for the fall of Jerusalem, who knows the WTBTS may have it right after all.
Paul (from the totally confused class)
don't worry, it's not for brainiacs, i only scored 3/10 yesterday!
there are just 10 questions on a different topic each day.
you don't have to play every day but if you've got a ruthless need to win it probably helps (unless your name is duncan is which case you can take a week off, stroll back to the quiz and still take top spot .
Todays is so USA bias, i'm gonna put in a formal complaint
Paul