I'm assuming BD that you're talking about v17? Living by faith?
Following on from your point, if faith is based on evidence is it really faith at all?
Paul
so, i recently finished reading "the god delusion" by richard dawkins.
i read it with a certain amount of hesitation.
after all, i am still recovering from my disappointment at realizing that the wts is not god's organization.
I'm assuming BD that you're talking about v17? Living by faith?
Following on from your point, if faith is based on evidence is it really faith at all?
Paul
so, i recently finished reading "the god delusion" by richard dawkins.
i read it with a certain amount of hesitation.
after all, i am still recovering from my disappointment at realizing that the wts is not god's organization.
Sorry BrotherDan, i missed it....
All men are without excuse for disbelief in God. According to the bible. Hebrews 11 examines faith closely and says that it is our expectation of things hoped for based on evidence. 11:6 says that without faith it is IMPOSSIBLE to please God, because anyone who comes to him must believe that he exists and that he rewards those that seek him.
I've just read Hebrews 11 and nowhere does it say that faith is based on evidence.
Paul
so, i recently finished reading "the god delusion" by richard dawkins.
i read it with a certain amount of hesitation.
after all, i am still recovering from my disappointment at realizing that the wts is not god's organization.
So what is your definition of faith, if Dawkins definition is incorrect?
since they have fingered you as a mod, you should have a very interesting tale to tell; please do!.
Thanks for sharing your story Rose.
Paul
so, i recently finished reading "the god delusion" by richard dawkins.
i read it with a certain amount of hesitation.
after all, i am still recovering from my disappointment at realizing that the wts is not god's organization.
Great thread, i've just started to read The God Delusion myself so was interested in what you had to say on it. I am finding myself disagreeing with some of the things that Richard Dawkins has said. I really want to challenge my conceptions of God after having spent a few years trying to create my own definition of what God is. I guess at the moment i'm what Dawkins calls a Pantheist, that the universe and God are one, but not necessarily something existential.
I'm interested in a comment you made in your opening post BrotherDan,
Dawkins criticism of religion revolves around his view of "blind faith". Almost all of his arguments are based arounnd this claim of faith. If he accepted the CORRECT definition of faith, he woul dhave to completely change or at least seriously reconsider his views on so much in his book. How scientific is Dawkins actually being in his analysis? I have say, "Not at all!"
What in your opinion is the correct definition of faith?
Paul
dear ones.
rather, it is our adversary who says we will do anything... anything... to avoid it.
a-n-y-t-h-i-n-g. even curse god to his face.
The issue is that God ALLOWS us to suffer....
do you really believe jesus was teaching the crowds that he would appoint a small group of men in ny in 1919 a "faithful and discreet slave class"????
?.
Brotherdan...Where's that pic from digderidoo?
Came up in a google search, but can't remember what i googled to get it Dan. Good one though.
Paul
do you really believe jesus was teaching the crowds that he would appoint a small group of men in ny in 1919 a "faithful and discreet slave class"????
?.
do you really believe jesus was teaching the crowds that he would appoint a small group of men in ny in 1919 a "faithful and discreet slave class"????
?.
do you really believe jesus was teaching the crowds that he would appoint a small group of men in ny in 1919 a "faithful and discreet slave class"????
?.