Radiometric age dating has put the earth at 4.5 billion years, plenty of time for something to happen
Radiometric and carbon dating is very inaccurate and very unscientific.
Read some basic Richard Dawkins, he will so much as tell you that, I doubt he realizes that though.
The earth may be old, the earth may be young but datting rocks is quasi science, it does not follow the scientific
method.
The only evidence we have as to the age of the earth is recorded history, beyond that we havent a clue.
Being born and raised as a JW I was forced to believe in unprovable information, I'm not jumping out of the
frying pan into the fire and joining the cult of the quasi scientific old age earthers.
You guys are just as certain of what you dont know today as you were when you were dubs.
Some things never change.
Real science gives us computers, medical therapys, atomic energy. The scientific method is provable.
Quasi science gives us arguments that are never resolved in ones life time.
Its good to have theories and wonder and explore. It would be good to be able to distingish reality from false information from some group
with a vested interest blowing smoke up your rear end.
Quasi scientist who date rocks and say the earth is billions of years old are only a small portion of the overall scientific community.
But it seems they are missleading many with unscientific information.
They are not challenged because there is no market or financial reward in proving the earth is 10 billions of years old vs one million
or 10,ooo years old.
There is a financial reward in finding fossil fuels. Finding fossil fuels is one thing, thats the reward. It doesnt matter how old the finder
thinks the stones the fossil fuels are in. Its the ability that finds the fuel that is rewarded not the age of the stones.