Now we all know many scientists who are creationists now weren’t creationists until they examined the evidence for themselves.
"Many" would be a huge exaggeration unless we reach back into history when most scientists believed in God. The vast majority of living scientists who study abiogenesis and related fields are atheists. Even if that is argued and an extensive list of scientists who believe in a creator can be found, belief has nothing to do with the science.
They found things that just did not fit into the naturalistic framework. They found things that required intelligent design.
No. Some have argued that the accepted explanations by the majority of scientists are not accepted by all. Some have objected to the way things are explained. But they did not FIND any solid proofs that intelligent design was required. Overstate your argument and lose credibility.
They studied the nature of DNA, human cells, trees, fossils, and even thunderstorms. They looked at it without the preconceived notion that it just came into existence.
No true scientist ever looks at "it" with a notion that "it just came into existence." This shows that you are ignorant of science and just rambling on as a believer.
In this way, we could and I do mean we could say science proves God exists because some of the best scientists have saw fit for themselves through a lot of research that God exists.
You say "some of the best" because they agree with you. FALSE. WRONG. And your conclusion is meaningless as science has not proven God exists.
Now lets say evolution did come by chance. And that everything came from nothing. Well, first of all, what created the nothing? What created the means by which things were to come into existence? All atheistic evolutionists cannot seem to explain how other planets were formed. If they can't explain that then what makes them think they could explain how Earth came to be? At least the creationist scientist were able to research and see for themselves what made sense instead of baseless assumptions. I'd like to know what the general people here think.
Science can explain how planets were formed. They can explain how everything was formed. I will skip the rest of that argument because you will stick with "No, they can't." If a creationists rejects "something from nothing" theories because it goes against the way we understand things, he still has the problem of "God" coming into existence (or always being there). Science attempts to explain this, belief just stops and says it is a mystery or pretends it isn't a problem.
