It seems they feel that it is God’s obligation to shield humans from ill-effects of their short-sighted acts.
On the subject of natural disaster:
Not to start a flame that leads to a forest fire, but I have heard people say that it is the parents' short-sightedness that causes them to continue living in a tsunami-prone or earthquake-prone area, so why would God do anything to save their children?
To this type of thinking, I say that every place on earth is subject to some kind of disaster. And not all people can simply pick up and move away from "the coast" or the "the open plains" or "the mountain area." If people die in a blizzard, flood, tornado, tsunami, earthquake, mudslide, avalanche, lightning storm, yadda yadda, there can be pause to wonder what God had to do with it. Firm believers are confident that God had absolutely nothing to do with it, and that's fine. But when perhaps greater than 100,000 children are swept away in a tsunami, the simple question arises: If I had the power to prevent that, wouldn't I?
Should I just say that humans have short-sight by daring to live where it is possible for such tragedy to happen? Where should they live?
I could ponder that same inaction by God concerning children born with birth defects that cause great suffering. How dare those parents have children.