If I may (and risk getting caught in the cross-fire):
If you want me to insult your intelligence I will, because I'm accommodating like that, but meanwhile you still evidently don't understand the meaning of the theological term "depravity" as used, so kindly get off your high horse.
I believe that the issue originally was whether Athiesm and Evolution is dangerous. It was introduced behind the veil of a question, when we all know it was not a genuine question on Perry's part. It was a way for him to more gently state his opinion that any who are not people of a 'Godly' nature are a danger to themselves, that they are deluding themselves by thinking they can serve as their own moral compass.
Emotions are bound to run high on a highly controversial topic such as this. Little Toe, I have always found your posts interesting and well thought out. However, I would just caution you that while you appear to be extremely self-confident in your intelligence (judging by the above-quoted statement), it's wise to temper your intelligence with a little humility and entertain the idea that maybe you are the one who 'doesn't get' what someone else is trying to say. Just a thought.