yk-
Back in October and November several apostates were apparently stunned by the turn of events and tried to spin it that I had said that Wall Street was going to war with itself.
i went back and looked through the thread....the only person that i could find that said anything about "wall street..going to war with itself", was in fact you. the only thing the rest of us said was that you predicted the financial system would be in crash down mode, or a state of war.....and i quoted your absurd backtracking and twisting of the issue for all to see on my last post.
Evidently you do care though. You have spent untold hours dealing with my little wager.
as ive stated many times, my exposing of you serves a purpose, and it has very little to do with whether or not i care personally about your wager, or any of your other viewpoints. spending "untold hours" refuting your nonsense does not mean that i take a personal interest in it.
You are lying. LaRouche didnt say Bin Laden didnt have anything to do with 9-11.
well, if he hasnt said that precisely, he has surely implied it....and like i said, after the video where bin laden specifically takes credit for the planning. heres larouches opinion of bin ladens involvement:
this myth of Osama bin Laden, which is a complete fraud: No fact has ever been presented, publicly, in any forum in the world, to give any backing whatsoever, for the allegation that al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden caused the events of Sept. 11th, in the United States! Not a single bit of evidence, was ever presented, publicly!
i guess i assumed that by calling bin laden a myth, he was implying bin laden didnt have anything to do with 9-11, silly me. also, i love how he shouts at the top of his lungs "not a single bit of evidence, was ever presented, publicly!"....lol, watch the video weve all seen larouche, and calm down.
It wasnt ridiculous.
he was dead wrong....call it what you want, i call it ridiculous.
No its not. Just like it wasnt public knowledge ...
heres a prime example of your deceit tactics....and again, i am happy to serve the purpose of pointing these lies out for the lurkers. here you said that it is not public knowledge that the government cooks its books......but on your previous post, you said:
but now of course it is public knowledge that the government and large corporations have lied and cooked their books
so in one breath you say it is public knowledge, this government book cooking, and the next breath you admit it is not........sometimes i wonder if you simply underestimate every reader out there, and think that no one will catch you in these constant lies and contradictions.
So you admit that the fakery has been going on a long time?
the revisions, yes...and theyve always been public, hardly fakery. again, why no mention of these revisions until now? why werent you screaming about book cooking in 1992 when the gdp was revised downward? because it wasnt book cooking then, and the only reason youre calling it that now is the term "book cooking" is en vogue, and you can toss it around and expect everyone to just accept that indeed it must be true of the government as well......you are transparent.
as far as the y2k thing goes....if larouche was indeed saying all along that it was nothing to worry about, then i commend you for actually going against the larouchepub grain on that issue, even if it did just make you look worse in the grand scheme of predictions.
aa