yk said:
What has changed in that situation? The answer is...nothing.
this is complete nonsense. just because there are still troops on both sides protecting their borders does not mean "nothing" has changed. there are still possibilities of future conflict between the two nations (there proabably will be for years to come considering the dispute has lasted decades), no one is denying that, but plenty has changed "in that situation" as of late.
first off, india withdrew its naval forces from pakistani waters, and opened up its airspace to pakistani commercial aircraft, reported as of june 17th >>> http://asia.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/south/06/17/india.pakistan/index.html
as of june 17th, india had also ruled out the immediate possibility of war with pakistan, and indicated that there was no "perceivable" tension along the line of control. at that time though, india was still ruling out dialouge with pakistan over the disputed kashmir state due to the continued cross-border terrorism taking place. since then, even more has changed.
as of june 18th, pakistan had moved its "extra" troops from the indian border back to the afghan border.........on june 20th, the indian defense minister reported that cross-border terrorism had decreased considerably, saying it had "almost ended", and as of june 28th, indian prime minister vajpayee had again entirely ruled out the possibility of war with pakistan and had for the first time opened up the possibility of talks with pakistan over the disputed state of kashmir. talks over the disputed state had previously been ruled out since july of 2001.
for someone to say that "nothing" has changed "in that situation" just shows complete and utter ignorance (or an obvious attempt at deceit).
aa
Edited by - dubla on 16 July 2002 11:5:40