What is not sane about this thought process is that you are suggesting that people's minds be influenced by 2nd century thought instead of the opposing 1st century thought that has no trinity or any other philosophy not taught by the canon of the bible.
If you don't mind though, could you please address Revelation 1:1 for me? Why did God need a revelation from God? And did the other 3rd God need a revelation from God also? How many parts of God needed a revelation from themselves? Rather schizophrenic if you ask me. The real fact of the matter is that Jesus is just a human and nothing more then the very best human to ever live according to the BIBLE... The 2nd century from the 1st is like comparing the 19th to the 20th. Cell phones werent' around in the 19th century. The trinity wasn't around in the 1st, but became an idea of man in the 2nd sometime during that 100 year period... It's definitely not what the bible teaches though, and that is all I need to know.
Your link lacks tact. It is bias towards false philosophies and doctrines of man.
Butters