I think the first two aren't misquotes? WT article says that some scientists think that if God existed, he would have been found. Which is what the quotes say.
The third and fourth are misquotes indeed.
The fifth about dogmatism I'm not quite sure why WT has cited it? Seems to me that it speaks against them, as WT believes that Jehovah created it all, so things are as they are because Jehovah created them that way. Which is dogmatic. Which is exactly what the 'quote' opposes; the author wants to keep an open mind. It seems that WT is quoting this to say that rejecting belief in God would be dogmatic, but this is utter silliness of course. Rejecting belief in elves and trolls is not dogmatic; that would be a redefinition of dogmatism :-)
I think the sixth quote about the Babylonians is just a fallacy on its own. Although I guess that Mr. Evans didn't mean to say that the "no-less-strange" proves there is a possibility of still finding God as it were. I think he just means it as a general statement, there are still many mysteries, but I'm not sure.
All in all, quote a useless article, just raising a bunch of questions without answering anything or enlightening the reader in any way.... but what did we expect? Haha. The articles on the next pages are increasingly worse... "Science cannot prevent crime"? Really? The only reason for not polluting the Earth is because God is going to punish you? Come on now, really?!