Is the watchtower basically admitting here that they disfellowshipped this guy for one allegation of fraud alone? It only speaks of one Mr Robert Wee claiming to be defrauded. Wasn't there a two-witness rule?
If this is the whole story it would be remarkable to use that two-witness Bible verse to defend not having to DF child abusers while in this fraud case, one witness was enough to decide to DF?