It looks better if it's tucked in but I rarely do. I find it feels more comfortable when it's not tucked in. Like someone said, if people don't like it they can look the other way.
badseed
JoinedPosts by badseed
-
34
Should Men Tuck In Their Shirts?
by minimus ini was reading an article about how men should not tuck in their shirts if the shirt is worn as casual wear.. i often wear suits with a black tee shirt, tucked in.
i have some great cabana style shirts that are always worn over the belt.
if i'm playing some sport, i would never tuck in a tee shirt.. i looked online after i read the article and it seems some are very firm on their position...... and while we're at it, should men wear a belt with jeans or with dress slacks?.
-
-
-
22
Question for IT experts.
by badseed inassuming that everytime i connect to the internet i'm in a different location ex:starbucks, mcdonald's, coffee shop, etc.
i then get a different ip address everytime (right?).
ex: i go at starbucks, get an ip address, sign into google using [email protected] (send a few emails, post a few comments) then logout and go to the mcdonald's a few blocks down the street and connect.
-
-
badseed
J. Hofer, that's what I read anyway. I'll just find myself some linux os and do it that way.
-
22
Question for IT experts.
by badseed inassuming that everytime i connect to the internet i'm in a different location ex:starbucks, mcdonald's, coffee shop, etc.
i then get a different ip address everytime (right?).
ex: i go at starbucks, get an ip address, sign into google using [email protected] (send a few emails, post a few comments) then logout and go to the mcdonald's a few blocks down the street and connect.
-
-
badseed
Thanks Anony Mous. The last paragraph was quite hilarious. I wish. "and MAYBE they won't find you"..after all those efforts..lol
mummatron, nothing that illegal, especially not trying to hack the pentagon (i'm crazy but not that crazy). -
22
Question for IT experts.
by badseed inassuming that everytime i connect to the internet i'm in a different location ex:starbucks, mcdonald's, coffee shop, etc.
i then get a different ip address everytime (right?).
ex: i go at starbucks, get an ip address, sign into google using [email protected] (send a few emails, post a few comments) then logout and go to the mcdonald's a few blocks down the street and connect.
-
-
badseed
@baltar: I suppose someone could delete cookies as they went before logging on to another network. I think maybe IP addresses can be tracked to a geographic location, so when you log on from across the country, google for example knows that you usually log from IPs in a certain area, so they warn you (or whoever is trying to hack your account..lol). So then, obviously they do keep track of IPs. Looking into the VPN. Thanks.
@thetrueone: Thanks for the link I'll play around with it. It seems free of use, I didn't see a price yet. Maybe at installation or when trying to initially use the service. Anyway I'll see.
@bohm I think continuously deleting cooking would sort of solve that. Kind of a pain in the behind though.
Thanks mummatron. I had read a while back about MAC addresses. I'll read up on that again but I think you can change them manually also (that too a pain}. -
22
Question for IT experts.
by badseed inassuming that everytime i connect to the internet i'm in a different location ex:starbucks, mcdonald's, coffee shop, etc.
i then get a different ip address everytime (right?).
ex: i go at starbucks, get an ip address, sign into google using [email protected] (send a few emails, post a few comments) then logout and go to the mcdonald's a few blocks down the street and connect.
-
-
badseed
Assuming that everytime I connect to the internet I'm in a different location ex:Starbucks, McDonald's, coffee shop, etc. I then get a different IP address everytime (right?).
Ex: I go at Starbucks, get an IP address, sign into google using [email protected] (send a few emails, post a few comments) then logout and go to the Mcdonald's a few blocks down the street and connect. I get a different IP address, sign into google using [email protected] (send a few emails, post a few comments) then logout. As far as google is concerned two different people logged into their account at two different locations versus using the same location for both users (google would see that both users used the same IP then must/could be the same person). In the first scenario, the only thing common to both locations was my laptop.So, is my laptop information also stored somewhere, how and by who? If yes, is it possible to block this?
-
10
Governing Body Member Ted Jaracz cornered at Convention and asked about Pedophile database
by Awen inhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orrokevgpcm&feature=channel_video_title.
-
-
badseed
that's ok, I'm sure he's all comfy up there.
-
39
The New Testament in Plain English and John 1:1
by Wonderment in.
the new testament in plain english (published, 2003) translates john 1:1c as: "the word was god.
" however, a footnote on this verse says: "or, deity, divine (which is actually a better translation, because the greek definite article is not present before this greek word).
-
-
badseed
godrulz would love to hijack this thread..
-
141
Short video: "I Was A Deluded 9/11 Truther"
by bohm inhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuluqfeqfuu&feature=feedu.
-
-
-
141
Short video: "I Was A Deluded 9/11 Truther"
by bohm inhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuluqfeqfuu&feature=feedu.
-
-
-
92
My Letter to local Newspapaer - Your Feedback Please?
by cofty inmy local congregation has been in the news this week following a successful application for planning permission for a quick build.
a local vicar objected because the application described it as a building for "christain worship".. .
vicar fury at new home for jehovahs .
-
-
badseed
Hi cofty, I like it.
Since I was sitting here bored and thought maybe a few phrases could be re-worded, I did a remix. Just to give you a different view of it. I tried to even out the lenght of the paragraphs and move a few things around. Take what you like.
------------
Reverend Knox set the planning committee an interesting challenge with his objection to the building of a new Kingdom Hall at Scremerston - I’m going to hazard a guess that local planning policy has very little to say about the Arian Controversy. When the vicar went on to hint at an unpleasant reality behind the public face of the Watchtower, he made an important point that deserves further comment.
I was raised in the sect and was an elder in the Berwick congregation before being ousted in 1996 for the crime of independent thinking - a punishable offence in the bizarre world of religious cults. I still have close family members in the organisation and I have no hesitation in saying that there are many good people among its ranks. Shortly we will all be invited to marvel at the speed and efficiency of their building project, it is likely that the hall will appear at a rate that will astonish their new neighbours. Uniformity can achieve impressive things but it comes at a crippling cost to the individual.
As a registered charity the Watchtower organisation has a legal duty to meet the ‘public benefit requirement’ and to show that benefits are “balanced against any detriment or harm”. Unless proselytising counts as public benefit it is difficult to see how they can satisfy this obligation. It’s unsurprising that a group who are preoccupied with the imminence of Armageddon show no interest in charitable acts towards non-members and take no part in the life of their local community.
The control that is exercised by a small group of elderly men in New York reaches out to influence every detail of the lives and thoughts of all Jehovah's Witnesses. Unquestioning obedience is enforced through a culture of fear and is the constant theme of their literature, songs, prayers and meetings. Those who voice concerns about the organisation’s teachings or practices are disfellowshipped (expelled maybe), prohibiting loyal Jehovah's Witnesses, including close family members and friends, from having any contact with the individual.
Perhaps the most serious detriment caused by this high control group is seen in the willingness of otherwise sensible people to sacrifice their lives, and the lives of their children to the cause of this cult. The cover of the May 22nd ‘94 edition of their magazine “The Awake” showed photographs of twenty six children under the heading “Youths Who Put God First”. Appalingly, it celebrated the sacrifice of these young children's lives in support of the Watchtower Organisation’s prohibition against blood transfusions.
Jehovah’s Witnesses will make good neighbours to the people of Scremerston. They will probably park considerately, come and go quietly and keep their premises tidy, but don’t confuse cordiality with friendship. “Only Jehovah's Witnesses…as a united organization under the protection of the Supreme Organizer, have any Scriptural hope of surviving the impending end of this doomed system dominated by Satan the Devil." Watchtower 1/9/89 p.19---------
Good luck