What I have on the mainstream stance vs. the GB mischaracterization of it is at
the next links:
http://glenster1.webs.com/gtjbrooklyn6b.htm
http://glenster1.webs.com/gtjbrooklyn7.htm
http://glenster1.webs.com/gtjbrooklyn8.htm
http://glenster1.webs.com/gtjbrooklyn9.htm
http://glenster1.webs.com/gtjbrooklyn10.htm
Larry Hurtado makes the case that prayer and worship in the devotional practice
of 1st cent. Jewish monotheism were reserved for God alone (not through a lesser
god), and Christians reserved them for God and Jesus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binitarianism#Scholarly_views_of_early_Christian_theology
http://larryhurtado.wordpress.com/2012/09/10/binitarian-dyadic-triadic-early-christian-god-talk-and-devotion/
The material for the mainstream holy spirit stance is debated. It could be
taken as related to Jesus as in the OT spirit is related to God. The mainsteam
stance sees the NT spirit referred to as personal and nothing requiring that to
be poetic personification about something impersonal, and that the NT has a
triadic relationship of Father, Son, and Spirit.
http://books.google.com/books?id=KLi5NLU3kAAC&printsec=frontcover&dq=larry+hurtado+God+in+New+Testament+Theology.&source=bl&ots=nPo_NHn_R6&sig=WyXfEhxX8shQoUVnZqi7g1JrSlI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=LqOCUKmuLoaC8AT1kYDICg&ved=0CC8QuwUwAA
http://www.amazon.com/God-Testament-Theology-Library-Biblical/dp/0687465451